Critical Criminology

, Volume 18, Issue 4, pp 295–306 | Cite as

The Corporate Crimes of Dow Chemical and the Failure to Regulate Environmental Pollution



A case study of Dow Chemical Company using scholarly research, journalistic investigations, and government documents reveals the existence of the criminogenic corporate-state. The Corporate-State manages and regulates itself with limited interference from the Environmental Protection Agency and in the form of Dow Chemicals is responsible for numerous environmental crimes both nationally and globally all of which have been linked to numerous health, labor and economic problems. Future researchers are encouraged to undertake similar case studies to expose the Corporate-State and the criminal harms done to ordinary citizens for the sake of profit.


Rome Statute Union Carbide Transnational Corporation Indian Government Safety Crime 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Beirne, P., & South, N. (2007). Issues in green criminology confronting harms against environments, humanity and other animals. Devon, UK: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
  2. Canadian Business and Current Affairs. (2003). Micromedia Limited. New Internationalist Publications Ltd. New Internationalist. July, 2003, Accessed July 3, 2007.
  3. Chipman, K. (2007). General Motors joins group calling for carbon cap; First carmaker. High fuel standards could hit truck sales. The Gazette, A division of CanWest MediaWorks Publication Inc. May 9, 2007. Accessed July 3, 2007.Google Scholar
  4. Deutsch, C. H. (2006). Global demand for clean water attracts big and small. The New York Times Company. August 10. Accessed July 3, 2007.Google Scholar
  5. Deutsche Presse-Agentur. (2002). Thai Greenpeace urges Dow Chemical to clean up Bhopal Mess. Bangkok, December 2 2002. Accessed July 3, 2007.Google Scholar
  6. Deutsche Presse-Agentur. (2004). Greenpeace demands Dow pay medical bills for Bhopal Victims 2004 December, 2. Accessed July 3, 2007.Google Scholar
  7. Doyle, J. (2004). Trespass against us Dow Chemical and the toxic century. Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press.Google Scholar
  8. Environmental Protection Agency. (2000). Default Order, Docket No. EPSCRA 09-99- 0030, FIRFA-09-99-025. In the Matter of Dow Chemical-Respondent. Region 9, dated August 7, 2000. Accessed July 3, 2007.Google Scholar
  9. Epson, J. (2003, July). Silicon Jack. Freedom Magazines International Incorporated. Latin Trade.Google Scholar
  10. Financial Times Information. (2004a). Dow Chemical should take part in the decontamination of Bhopal 2004 global news wire-Europe intelligence wire, Pozitron Information Services, and Access Czech Republic Business Bulletin. November 24, 2004 Accessed July 3, 2007.
  11. Financial Times Information. (2004b). Amnesty wants Bhopal studies made public. Global news wire-Asia Africa intelligence wire, Indian Online Media Limited. November 30, Accessed July 3, 2007.
  12. Financial Times Information. (2004c). A mushroom cloud of poison. Global News Wire-Asia Africa Intelligence Wire, Indian Online Media Limited. November 30, Accessed July 3, 2007.
  13. Financial Times Information. (2006). Eco friendly project aids clean-up of production, 2006. Global News Wire-Asia Africa Intelligence Wire. April 13. Accessed July 3, 2007.Google Scholar
  14. Financial Times Information. (2007a). Global News Wire-Asia African Intelligence Wire. The Indian Express Online Media Limited Source, 1984. Bhopal Survivors Say Ratan Tata is Anti-National. January 3, 2007. Accessed July 3, 2007.Google Scholar
  15. Financial Times Information. (2007b). Global News Wire-Asia Africa Intelligence Wire. Dow Chemicals Kick-Back Issue Rocks Agricultural Ministry. February 16, 2007. Accessed July 3, 2007.Google Scholar
  16. Financial Times Information. (2007c). Dow Chemicals kick-back issue rocks agricultural ministry, 2007b. MP Task Force Ignores Advice on Bhopal Gas Leak Waste Global News Wire-Asia Africa Intelligence Wire. February 16, 2007 Accessed July 3, 2007.Google Scholar
  17. Herrick, T., Newman, M., & Schroeder, M. (2003). US opposes EU effort to test chemicals for health hazards. The Wall Street Journal 9 Sept 2003 Retrieved Accessed July 3, 2007.
  18. Kramer, R. C., Michalowski, R. J., & Kauzlarich, D. (2002). The origins and develop of the concept and theory of state-corporate crime. Crime and Delinquency, 48(2), 263–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ling, A., & Olson, M. J. (2003). Pesticide action network of North America. Multinational Monitor. The Front, Pesticide Justice. January/February, p. 6.Google Scholar
  20. Mead, N. (2008). Cancer and TCDD: The mitochondrial connection. Environmental Health Perspectives, 116:3:A112.Google Scholar
  21. Mokhiber, R., & Weissman, R. (2004, December) The ten worst corporations of 2004. Multinational Monitor, 8–21.Google Scholar
  22. Multinational Monitor (2004, November). Interview chemical trespass, the verdict on Dow, an interview with Jack Doyle, 23:11:24–27.Google Scholar
  23. Palmer, M. G. (2007). The care of agent orange. The Journal of Contemporary Southeast Asia, 29, 72–195.Google Scholar
  24. Pearce, F., & Tombs, S. (1996). Hegemony, risk and governance: ‘Social regulation’ and the American Chemical Industry. Economy and Society, 25(3), 428–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pearce, F., & Tombs, S. (1998). Toxic capitalism: Corporate crime and the chemical industry. Aldershot: Ashgate Dartmouth Publishers.Google Scholar
  26. Sutherland, E. H. (1983) White collar crime formulating the concept and providing corporate baseline data. From white collar crime: The Uncut Version (pp. 13–25). Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Transnational Organization (2007). Dow Chemical Report Paid for and accessed July 2, 2007.
  28. United States Security and Exchange Commission Washington DC. (2005). Annual report pursuant to section 13 OR 15(d) OF THE For the fiscal year ended DECEMBER 31, 2005 Commission file number: 1-3433. (123 pp.).

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Sociology, Social Work and CriminologyMorehead State UniversityMoreheadUSA

Personalised recommendations