Advertisement

Critical Criminology

, Volume 19, Issue 3, pp 175–196 | Cite as

Structuration Theory and Wrongful Imprisonment: From ‘Victimhood’ to ‘Survivorship’?

  • Gabe Tan
Article

Abstract

Building on existing research from a zemiological approach, this article seeks to contribute to a more ontological understanding of the production and reproduction of harms associated with wrongful imprisonment in England and Wales. Drawing from Anthony Giddens’s theory of structuration, it is argued that whilst the harms of wrongful imprisonment are both complex and devastating, victims need not be perceived as entirely passive. Rather, victims of wrongful imprisonment can be viewed as knowledgeable agents with the intrinsic capacity and agency to strategically cope with and even survive the harms that they experience. The article concludes with personal accounts by victims of wrongful imprisonment that form an identifiable ‘survivor’ discourse to highlight some of the key critical factors that are vital in helping victims of wrongful imprisonment to re-structure their lives after release.

Keywords

State Crime Social Harm Wrongful Conviction Innocent Victim False Confession 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

I am tremendously grateful to Michael Naughton for his unstinting encouragement and assistance with previous drafts. I would also like to express my gratitude to the two Anonymous Reviewers for their critical engagement and constructive comments on the original submission which have forced me to clarify my thoughts and undoubtedly improved the article. The usual caveat applies—any errors or mistakes are my own.

References

  1. BBC News. (2000). “Murderer” freed after 20 years. March 30.Google Scholar
  2. BBC News. (2002). DNA trawl begins for Lynette Killer. January 19.Google Scholar
  3. BBC News. (2006a). Sex abuse verdicts quashed again. October 16.Google Scholar
  4. BBC News. (2006b). Downing given final compensation. October 16.Google Scholar
  5. Tomorrow’s People (2010). http://www.tomorrows-people.org.uk. Accessed 2 June 2010.
  6. Batt, M. (2004). Stolen innocence: The authorised story of Sally Clark. United Kingdom: Ebury Press.Google Scholar
  7. Blair, T. (2005). Cited in Smith, J. ‘Blair apologises for bombings “injustice”’. The Independent, February 9.Google Scholar
  8. Booth, J. (2009). Police name David Lace as true killer of Teresa De Simone. The Times, September 17.Google Scholar
  9. Bracken, P. (2001). Post-modernity and post-traumatic stress disorder. Social Science and Medicine, 53(6), 733–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bryant, C., & Jary, D. (2003). Anthony Giddens. In G. Ritzer (Ed.), The Blackwell companion to major social theorists (pp. 247–273). London: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  11. Burnett, C. (2002). Constructions of innocence. UMKC Law Review, 70(4), 971–982.Google Scholar
  12. Callan, K. (1998). Kevin Callan’s story. New York: Time Warner.Google Scholar
  13. Campbell, D. (2008). My whole character changed. The Guardian, September 10.Google Scholar
  14. Campbell, K., & Denov, M. (2004). The burden of innocence: Coping with a wrongful imprisonment. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 46(2), 139–164.Google Scholar
  15. Clegg, S. (1989). Frameworks of power. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  16. Conlon, G. (1994). Proved innocent: The story of Gerry Conlon of the Guildford four. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  17. Conlon, S. (2005). Cited in BBC News (2005) ‘Ahern in plea over Guildford Four’, January 27.Google Scholar
  18. Criminal Appeal Act. 1968. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  19. Criminal Appeal Act. 1995. (c.35). London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  20. Criminal Cases Review Commission. (2010a). About us. http://www.ccrc.gov.uk/about.htm. Accessed 23 May 2010.
  21. Criminal Cases Review Commission. (2010b). Case library. http://www.ccrc.gov.uk/cases/case_44.htm. Accessed 23 May 2010.
  22. Criminal Justice Act. 1988. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  23. Criminal Justice and Immigration Act. 2008. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  24. Denov, M., & Campbell, K. (2005). Criminal injustice: Understanding the causes, effects and responses to wrongful convictions in Canada. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 21(3), 224–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Doward, J. (2008). How this woman stood by Barry George and helped him survive. The Guardian, August 3.Google Scholar
  26. Farrall, S., & Bowling, B. (1999). Structuration, human development and desistance from crime. British Journal of Criminology, 39(2), 253–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 87–104). London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  28. Foundation Training Company (FTC). (2010). http://www.ftctraining.org. Accessed 2 June 2010.
  29. Fresco, A. (2009). “Attention seeker” Ian Lawless has murder conviction quashed. The Times, June 16.Google Scholar
  30. Gaines, S. (2008). Prison hosts job fair for inmates. The Guardian, September 17.Google Scholar
  31. Gammell, C. (2007). Alcohol killed freed mother Sally Clark. The Telegraph, November 8.Google Scholar
  32. Gibb, F. (2007). Bridgewater three must pay Jail B & B. The Times, March 15.Google Scholar
  33. Giddens, A. (1976) [1993]. New rules of sociological method. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory: Action, structure and contradiction in social analysis. London/Basingstoke: The MacMillan Press.Google Scholar
  35. Giddens, A. (1982). Sociology—a brief but critical introduction. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  36. Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  37. Giddens, A. (1987). Social theory and modern sociology. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Giddens, A. (1990). The consequence of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  39. Gordon, D., Hillyard, P., & Pantazis, C. (1999). ‘Introduction to Zemia and Zemiology’, cited in Naughton, M. (2007). Rethinking miscarriages of justice (pp. 162). Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  40. Green, A. (1997). How the criminal justice system knows. Social and Legal Studies, 6(1), 4–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Greenhill, S. (2006). Man freed but serial rape accuser remains anonymous. Daily Mail, September 12.Google Scholar
  42. Grounds, A. (2004). Psychological consequences of wrongful conviction and imprisonment. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 46(2), 165–182.Google Scholar
  43. Grounds, A. (2005). Understanding the effects of wrongful imprisonment. Crime and Justice, 32, 1–58.Google Scholar
  44. Grounds, A., & Jamieson, R. (2003). No sense of an ending: Researching the experience of imprisonment and release among republican ex-prisoners. Theoretical Criminology, 7(3), 347–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hale, D. (2002). Town without pity: The fight to clear Stephen Downing of the bakewell murder. London: Century.Google Scholar
  46. Hayes, J., & Nutman, P. (1981). Understanding the unemployed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  47. Hill, P. (2001). The parole deal. Inside time. Autumn 2001.Google Scholar
  48. Hill, P., & Hunt, G. (1996). Forever lost, forever gone. London: Bloomsbury Press.Google Scholar
  49. Hillyard, P., Pantazis, C., Tombs, S., & Gordon, D. (Eds.). (2004). Beyond criminology: Taking harm seriously. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  50. Hillyard, P., & Tombs, S. (2004). Beyond criminology? In P. Hillyard, C. Pantazis, S. Tombs, & D. Gordon (Eds.), Beyond criminology: Taking harm seriously (pp. 10–29). London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  51. Hillyard, P., & Tombs, S. (2005). Beyond criminology? In P. Hillyard, C. Pantazis, D. Gordon, S. Tombs, & D. Dorling (Eds.), Criminal obsessions: Why harm matters more than crime. London: Crime and Society Foundation.Google Scholar
  52. Hopkins, N. (2002). Man wrongly convicted of murder freed after 25 years. The Guardian, November 14.Google Scholar
  53. Huff, R., Rattner, A., & Sagarin, E. (1986). Guilty until proven innocent: Wrongful conviction and public policy. Crime and Delinquency, 32(4), 518–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Hughes, M. (2009). Police officers charged over “Cardiff Three” miscarriage of justice. The Independent, March 4.Google Scholar
  55. Jamieson, R., & Grounds, A. (2005). Release and adjustment: Perspectives from studies of wrongly convicted and politically motivated prisoners. In A. Liebling & S. Maruna (Eds.), The effects of imprisonment. Devon: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
  56. Johnson, P., & Williams, R. (2004). Post-conviction DNA testing: The UK’s first “exoneration” case? Science and Justice, 44(2), 77–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Kamara, J. (2010). Cited in Shorter, L. (2010). Johnny Kamara: What’s helped me has been a stable relationship and the kids. The Guardian, March 31.Google Scholar
  58. Kauzlarich, D., Matthews, R., & Miller, W. (2001). Towards a victimology of state crime. Critical Criminology, 10(3), 173–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Legal TV. (2009). Innocent: Paul Blackburn. http://www.legaltv.co.uk/innocent/. Accessed 20 September.
  60. Maguire, A. (2005). Cited in BBC News. (2005). PM apology over IRA bomb jailings. February 9.Google Scholar
  61. Maguire, P. (2008). My father’s watch: The story of a child prisoner in 70s Britain. London: Fourth Estate.Google Scholar
  62. Maguire, A., & Gallagher, J. (1994). Miscarriage of justice: An Irish family’s story of wrongful conviction as IRA terrorists. United Kingdom: Court Wayne Press.Google Scholar
  63. Marsh, I., & Melville, G. (2008). Crime, justice and the media. Oxford: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  64. Mawby, R., & Walklate, S. (1994). Critical victimology. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  65. McConville, M., & Bridges, L. (Eds.). (1994). Criminal justice in crisis. Hants, England: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  66. McLennan, G. (1984). Critical or positive theory? A comment on the status of Anthony Giddens’ social theory. Theory, Culture and Society, 2(2), 123–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Miller, S. (2003). Cited in Bruxelles S. (2003). Cardiff three tells of abuse and continuing torment. The Times, July 5.Google Scholar
  68. Miscarriage of Justice Organisation (MOJO). (2010). http://www.mojoscotland.com. Accessed 2 June 2010.
  69. National Association for the Care and Resettlement of Offenders (NACRO). (2010). http://www.nacro.org.uk/services/employment.htm. Accessed 2 June 2010.
  70. Naughton, M. (2001). Wrongful convictions: Towards a zemiological analysis of the tradition of criminal justice system reform. Radical Statistics, No. 76.Google Scholar
  71. Naughton, M. (2003a). Convicted from crimes that never happened. The Guardian, October 19.Google Scholar
  72. Naughton, M. (2003b). How big is the iceberg? A zemiological approach to quantifying miscarriages of justice. Radical Statistics, 81, 5–17.Google Scholar
  73. Naughton, M. (2005). Why the failure of the prison service and the parole board to acknowledge wrongful imprisonment is untenable. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 44(1), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Naughton, M. (2006). Wrongful convictions and innocence projects in the UK: Help, hope and education. Web Journal of Current Legal Issues [2006] 3 Web JCLI.Google Scholar
  75. Naughton, M. (2007). Rethinking miscarriages of justice: Beyond the tip of the iceberg. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Naughton, M. (Ed.). (2009a). The criminal cases review commission: Hope for the innocent?. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  77. Naughton, M. (2009b). Does the NOMS risk assessment bubble have to burst for prisoners who may be innocent to make progress? Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 48(4), 357–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Nobles, R., & Schiff, D. (1995). Miscarriages of justice: A systems approach. Modern Law Review, 58(3), 299–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Nobles, R., & Schiff, D. (2006). Guilt and innocence in the criminal justice system: A comment on R (Mullen) v Secretary of State for the Home Department. Modern Law Review, 69(1), 80–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. O’Brien, M. (2008). Cited in Campbell D. (2008). My whole character changed. The Guardian, September 10.Google Scholar
  81. O’Brien, M., & Lewis, G. (2008). The death of justice. Ceredigion, Wales: YLolfa.Google Scholar
  82. O’Neill, S. (2009). DNA clears “killer” Sean Hodgson after 30 years in jail. The Times, March 12.Google Scholar
  83. Olden, M. (2003). Justice—but at what cost? The Independent, August 19.Google Scholar
  84. Penzell, A. (2007). Apology in the context of wrongful conviction: Why the system should say it’s sorry. Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution, 9(1), 145–162.Google Scholar
  85. Police and Criminal Evidence Act. 1984. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  86. R v. Hakala, Peter. (2002). EWCA Crim 730.Google Scholar
  87. R v. Mullen, Nicholas. (1999). EWCA Crim 278.Google Scholar
  88. Radelet, M., Lofquist, W., & Bedau, H. (1996). Prisoners release from death rows since 1970 because of doubts about their guilt. Thomas M. Cooley Law Review, 13(3), 907–966.Google Scholar
  89. Roberts, S. (2003). Unsafe convictions: Defining and compensating miscarriages of justice. Modern Law Review, 66(3), 441–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Rose, N., & Miller, P. (1992). Political power beyond the state: Problematics of government. British Journal of Sociology, 43(2), 173–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Royal Courts of Justice (RCJ) Advice Bureau. (2010). Miscarriages of justice support service. http://www.rcjadvice.org.uk/miscarriages-justice.php. Accessed 3 June 2010.
  92. Sharma, A., & Gupta, A. (2006). The anthropology of the state. London: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  93. Shaw, D. (2003). Sailor awaits murder appeal hearing. BBC News, July 2.Google Scholar
  94. Shorter, L. (2010). Johnny Kamara: What’s helped me has been a stable relationship and the kids. The Guardian, March 31.Google Scholar
  95. Stones, R. (2005). Structuration theory. Basingstoke/Hampshire: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  96. Sydow, J. (2000). Understanding the constitution of interorganizational trust. In C. Lane & R. Bachmann (Eds.), Trust within and between organizations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  97. Tan, G. (2009). Beyond zemiology? Assessing aftercare for miscarriage of justice victims in England and wales through the lens of structuration theory. M.Sc. Dissertation, University of Bristol (Unpublished).Google Scholar
  98. Taylor, N. (2005). Compensation: Assessment of damages for wrongful conviction. Journal of Criminal Law, 69(2), 117–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Thompson, J. (1989). A theory of structuration. In D. Held & J. Thompson (Eds.), Social theory of modern societies: Anthony Giddens and his critics (pp. 56–76). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. UNLOCK. (2010). http://www.unlock.org.uk. Accessed 2 June 2010.
  101. Walker, P. (2009). Crackheads are fine. It’s Asda that scares me. The Guardian, June 9.Google Scholar
  102. Walker, C., & Starmer, K. (Eds.). (1999). Miscarriage of justice: A review of justice in error. London: Blackstone Press Limited.Google Scholar
  103. Walklate, S. (1992). Researching victims of crime: Critical victimology. In J. Lowman & B. MacLean (Eds.), Realist criminology: Crime control and policing in the 1990s. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  104. Walklate, S. (2008). Researching victims. In R. King & E. Wincup (Eds.), Doing research on crime and justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  105. Westervelt, S., & Cook, K. (2007). Feminist research methods in theory and action: Learning from death row Exonerees. In S. Miller (Ed.), Criminal justice research and practice: Diverse voices from the field (pp. 21–38). Boston: University Press of New England.Google Scholar
  106. Westervelt, S., & Cook, K. (2008). Coping with innocence after death row. Contexts, 7(4), 32–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Westervelt, S., & Cook, K. (2010). Framing innocents: The wrongly convicted as victims of state harm. Crime, Law and Social Change, 53, 259–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Winefield, A. (1993). Growing up with unemployment. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  109. Woffinden, B. (2003). Child abuse verdicts unsafe. The Guardian, March 15.Google Scholar
  110. Woffinden, B. (2007). Capital punishment by another name. Inside Time: The National Newspaper for Prisoners, Issue No. 101, November.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Innocence Network UK (INUK)School of Law, University of BristolBristolUK

Personalised recommendations