Skip to main content
Log in

The Roots of Modern White-Collar Crime: Does the Modern Form of White-Collar Crime have its Foundation in the Transition from a Society Dominated by Agriculture to One Dominated by Industry?

  • Published:
Critical Criminology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of the present paper is to investigate whether the process of transition from an agricultural to an industrial society was a watershed for white-collar crime, such that this type of crime increased rapidly in connection with the industrialization process. The theoretical reasoning behind this notion is that the transition process promoted a mentality characterized by self-centered values and a culture of competitiveness, which together paved the way for fraud perpetrated at the expense of others. The data are from Statistic Sweden’s historical records and cover the period of 1864–1912. Since there is no way to measure all crimes that can be defined as white collar crime, we have used bankruptcy offences as an example of white collar crime. The results do not support the notion that the transition period from an agricultural to an industrial society showed an increase in bankruptcy offences. Instead, the results show that when fluctuations in the economy are taken into account, the industrialization process per se entailed less bankruptcy offences. On the other hand, other research using the case of Sweden has shown that it was first after World War II that bankruptcy offences increased rapidly. Our argument is that the transition process as a structural mechanism had a greater impact on bankruptcy offences when industrialized capitalism became advanced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Sutherland (1949).

  2. Friedrichs (1996).

  3. Coleman (1987, 1998), Colley (2005), Locker and Godfrey (2006), Robb (1992, 2006), Schlegel and Weisburd (1994), Taylor (2005), and Wilson (2006).

  4. Shapiro (1984), Croall (1992), Gratzer and Stiefel (2008), Howard Davia et al. (2000).

  5. Magnusson (1996), Schön (2000).

  6. Magnusson and Ottosson (2003).

  7. Robb (1992, 2006).

  8. Coleman (1987).

  9. Ibid and Coleman (1998), Schlegel and Weisburd (1994).

  10. Locker and Godfrey (2006).

  11. This, of course, implies that we don’t catch all bankruptcy offences of the period. However, keeping in mind problems with historical data, using data on convicted crimes probably best catch the crime rate in the society. At least we know that these crimes have been committed. A weakness with the data is however, that convicted crime contains selection problems on the individual level. But since we are only interested in the amount of crime, and not who committed the crime, this is a minor problem. There is no reason to believe that the selection effects during our research period vary in such way that our analyses get spoiled (see note 22). Using reported bankruptcy offences would be an alternative.

  12. Edvinsson (2005).

  13. Magnusson (1996).

  14. Ibid.

  15. Magnusson (2000).

  16. Schön (2000).

  17. James (2001), Schön (2000).

  18. Coleman (1987, 1998), Locker and Godfrey (2006), Robb (1992, 2006), and Wilson (2006).

  19. Magnusson (2000).

  20. Gratzer (2001).

  21. Sutherland (1949).

  22. To a scholar, it looks like we take the position of a revisionist definition of white-collar crime (see Geis (2007). Formally this is true, we have no other data than data from penal law, but our choice of this particular section of the law points to the fact that such criminal behavior would not have been possible in occupations other than those involving rather free entrepreneurship.

  23. Gratzer (2001).

  24. This section of law has been constant in its intention, purpose and scope during the period of investigation, concentrated to fraudulent acts by the debtor of the creditor’s property or the debtors misuse in his trade activity of invested capital by the creditor. The modifications have over the period been concentrated to the strength of penalty (Sverige Rikes Lag chapt. 23 1–6 § 1911).

  25. Ryding (1888).

  26. The general profit ratio is measured by dividing the aggregated industrial gross surplus by the aggregated industrial net stock of produced assets. For more information, see Edvinsson (2005).

  27. The data are based on the calculation made by Ibid.

  28. Ibid.

  29. Our own calculations based on Edvinsson (2005).

  30. North (1990).

  31. Gratzer (2001).

  32. Ibid. Found that 53 percent of the variation in bankrupt offence could be explained by the variation in bankruptcy in general.

  33. Locker and Godfrey (2006), Robb (1992, 2006).

References

  • Coleman, J. W. (1987). Toward an integrated theory of white-collar crime. American Journal of Sociology, 93, 406–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. W. (1998). The criminal elite: Understanding white-collar crime. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colley, R. (2005). The Soreditch tax frauds: A study of the relationship between the state and civil society in 1860. Historical Research, 78, 540–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croall, H. (1992). White collar crime: Criminal justice and criminology. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davia, H. R., Coggins, P., Wideman, J., & Kastantin, J. (2000). Accountant’s guide to fraud detection and control (2nd ed.). USA: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edvinsson, R. (2005). Growth, accumulation, crisis: With new macroeconomic data for Sweden 1800–2000. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrichs David, O. (1996). Trusted criminals. New York: Wadsworths.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geis, G. (2007). White-collar and corporate crime. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gratzer, K. (2001). Konkurs och kriminalitet i ett jämförande perspektiv under 1900-talet. In: L. Appelgren & H. Sjögren (Eds.). Ekonomisk brottslighet och nationalstatens kontrollmakt, Stockholm: Gidlunds förlag.

  • Gratzer, K., & Stiefel, D. (2008). History of insolvency and bankruptcy: From an international perspective. Södertörn: Södertörn University. http://www.diva-portal.org/sh/abstract.xsql?dbid=1737.

  • James, H. (2001). The end of globalization: Lessons from the great depression. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locker, J. P., & Godfrey, B. (2006). Ontological boundaries and temporal watersheds in the development of white-collar crime. British Journal of Criminology, 46, 976–992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson, L. (1996). Sveriges ekonomiska historia. Stockholm: Tiden/Athena.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson, L. (2000). Den tredje industriella revolutionen—och den svenska arbetsmarknaden. Stockholm: Prisma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson, L., & Ottosson, J. (2003). Den tredje industriella revolutionen och “den nya ekonomin”—mellan sken och verklighet. In C. V. Otter (Ed.), Ute och inne i svenskt arbetsliv : Forskare analyserar och spekulerar om trender i framtidens arbete. Stockholm: Arbetslivsinstitutet.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nycander, S. (2002). Makten över arbetsmarknaden: Ett perspektiv på Sveriges 1900-tal. Stockholm: SNS förlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyström, Ö. (2000). Mellan anpassning och motstånd: Facket och det nya arbetslivet. Stockholm: Atlas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robb, G. (1992). White-collar crime in modern England: Financial fraud and business morality 1845–1929. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robb, G. (2006). Women and white-collar crime—debates on gender, fraud and the corporate economy in England and America 1850–1930. British Journal of Criminology, 46, 1058–1072.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rydin, K. (1888). Om konkursförbrytelser. Upsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlegel, K., & Weisburd, D. (1994). White-collar crime reconsidered. Boston: Northeastern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, L. (2000). En modern svensk ekonomisk historia : Tillväxt och omvandling under två sekel. Stockholm: SNS förl.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, S. (1984). Wayward capitalists: Target of the securities and exchange commission. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, E. H. (1949). White collar crime. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swenson, P. (2002). Capitalists against markets: The making of labor markets and welfare states in the United States and Sweden. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. (2005). Commercial fraud and public men in Victorian Britain. Historical Research, 78, 230–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, S. (2006). Law, morality and regulation—victorian experiences of financial crime. British Journal of Criminology, 46, 1073–1090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tage Alalehto.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alalehto, T., Larsson, D. The Roots of Modern White-Collar Crime: Does the Modern Form of White-Collar Crime have its Foundation in the Transition from a Society Dominated by Agriculture to One Dominated by Industry?. Crit Crim 17, 183–193 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-009-9079-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-009-9079-7

Keywords

Navigation