Abstract
This article deals with discretionary decisions made by British immigration officers about whether to detain asylum seekers. It takes as its point of departure the remarkable variety of views and practices reported by front line decision-makers interviewed at British ports (Weber and Gelsthorpe 2000; Weber and Landman 2002). The discussion begins by drawing historical parallels between the pre-Holocaust era and the present day hostility towards asylum seekers, which forms the wider context for official decision-making. It notes the failure of structural analyses to account for individual differences in rule-following and draws on theoretical perspectives developed by American social psychologists Kelman and Hamilton (1989) to explore the individual dynamics of conformity and dissent. In the concluding section, theoretical connections are made between the idea of discretionary detention as a crime of obedience, and contemporary discussion about state crime and governmentality. The underlying message of this article is as much a normative as an analytical one. While recognizing the practical limitations of individual conscience, the discussion ends, as it begins, by celebrating the emancipatory potential of dissent in the face of populist policies that sanction harm against targeted groups.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amnesty International (1995) Prisoners Without a Voice Amnesty International British Section London
InstitutionalAuthorNameAmnesty International (1996) Cell Culture: The Detention and Imprisonment of Asylum-Seekers in the United Kingdom Amnesty International British Section London
H. Arendt (1963) Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on The Banality of Evil Faber and Faber London
Z. Bauman (1989) Modernity and the Holocaust Polity Cambridge
Z. Bauman (2001) Community: Seeking Safety in an Insecure World Polity Cambridge
U. Beck (1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity Sage London
S. Cohen (1993) ArticleTitleHuman rights and crimes of the state: The culture of denial Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology 26 97–115
S. Cohen (2001) States of Denial: Knowing About Atrocities and Suffering Polity Press Cambridge
H. Crawley (1999) Breaking Down the Barriers: A Report on The Conduct of Asylum Interviews at Ports Immigration Law Practitioners’ Association London
D. Emmet (1966) Rules, Roles and Relations Beacon Press Boston
W.A. Gamson (1989) ArticleTitleReview of “Crimes of Obedience” by Herbert C Kelman and V. Lee Hamilton. American Journal of Sociology 95 IssueID3 780–782
D. Garland (1997) ArticleTitle‘Governmentality’ and the problem of crime: Foucault, criminology, sociology Theoretical Criminology 1 IssueID2 173–214
D.J. Goldhagen (1996) Hitler’s Willing Executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust Little Brown and Company London
P.J. Green T. Ward (2000) ArticleTitleState crime, human rights, and the limits of criminology Social Justice 27 IssueID1 101–115
K. Hayward W. Morrison (2002) Locating ‘Ground Zero’: Caught between the narratives of crime and war J. Strawson (Eds) Law After Ground Zero Glasshouse Press Sydney
D. Joly L. Kelly C. Nettleton (1997) Refugees in Europe: The Hostile New Agenda Minority Rights Group London
D. Kauzlarich C.W. Mullins R.A. Matthews (2003) ArticleTitleA complicity continuum of state crime Contemporary Justice Review 6 IssueID3 241–254
H.C. Kelman V.L. Hamilton (1989) Crimes of Obedience: Toward a Social Psychology of Authority and Obedience Yale University Press London
A. Modigliani (1990) ArticleTitleReview of “Crimes of Obedience: Towards a social psychology of authority and responsibility” Contemporary Sociology 19 IssueID2 259–260
R. Reiner (2000) The Politics of the Police EditionNumber3 Oxford University Press Oxford
M. Smith (1999) Foley: The Spy Who Saved 10,000 Jews Hodder & Stoughton London
L. Weber (2002) ArticleTitleThe detention of asylum seekers: 20 reasons why criminologists should care Current Issues in Criminal Justice (Special Issue on Refugees and Criminology) 14 IssueID1 9–30
L. Weber (2003a) Decisions to detain asylum seekers–routine, duty or individual choice? L. Gelsthorpe N. Padfield (Eds) Exercising Discretion:Decision-Making in the Criminal Justice System and Beyond. Willan Publishing Uffculme
L. Weber (2003b) ArticleTitleDown that wrong road: Discretion in decisions to detain asylum seekers arriving at UK ports The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice 42 IssueID3 248–262
L. Weber L. Gelsthorpe (2000) Deciding to Detain: How Decisions to Detain Asylum Seekers are Made at Ports of Entry Institute of Criminology, University of Cambridge Cambridge
L. Weber T. Landman (2002) Deciding to Detain: The Organisational Context for Decisions to Detain Asylum Seekers at UK Ports Human Rights Centre, University of Essex Colchester
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Weber, L. The Detention of Asylum Seekers as a Crime of Obedience. Crit Crim 13, 89–109 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-004-6169-4
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-004-6169-4