Critical Criminology

, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp 89–109 | Cite as

The Detention of Asylum Seekers as a Crime of Obedience

  • Leanne Weber


This article deals with discretionary decisions made by British immigration officers about whether to detain asylum seekers. It takes as its point of departure the remarkable variety of views and practices reported by front line decision-makers interviewed at British ports (Weber and Gelsthorpe 2000; Weber and Landman 2002). The discussion begins by drawing historical parallels between the pre-Holocaust era and the present day hostility towards asylum seekers, which forms the wider context for official decision-making. It notes the failure of structural analyses to account for individual differences in rule-following and draws on theoretical perspectives developed by American social psychologists Kelman and Hamilton (1989) to explore the individual dynamics of conformity and dissent. In the concluding section, theoretical connections are made between the idea of discretionary detention as a crime of obedience, and contemporary discussion about state crime and governmentality. The underlying message of this article is as much a normative as an analytical one. While recognizing the practical limitations of individual conscience, the discussion ends, as it begins, by celebrating the emancipatory potential of dissent in the face of populist policies that sanction harm against targeted groups.


Asylum Seeker Practical Limitation Wide Context Front Line Remarkable Variety 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. International, Amnesty 1995Prisoners Without a VoiceAmnesty International British SectionLondonRevised editionGoogle Scholar
  2. Amnesty International1996Cell Culture: The Detention and Imprisonment of Asylum-Seekers in the United KingdomAmnesty International British SectionLondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Arendt, H. 1963Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on The Banality of EvilFaber and FaberLondonGoogle Scholar
  4. Bauman, Z. 1989Modernity and the HolocaustPolityCambridgeGoogle Scholar
  5. Bauman, Z. 2001Community: Seeking Safety in an Insecure WorldPolityCambridgeGoogle Scholar
  6. Beck, U. 1992Risk Society: Towards a New ModernitySageLondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Cohen, S. 1993Human rights and crimes of the state: The culture of denialAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology2697115Google Scholar
  8. Cohen, S. 2001States of Denial: Knowing About Atrocities and SufferingPolity PressCambridgeGoogle Scholar
  9. Crawley, H. 1999Breaking Down the Barriers: A Report on The Conduct of Asylum Interviews at PortsImmigration Law Practitioners’ AssociationLondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Emmet, D. 1966Rules, Roles and RelationsBeacon PressBostonGoogle Scholar
  11. Gamson, W.A. 1989Review of “Crimes of Obedience” by Herbert CKelman and V. Lee Hamilton. American Journal of Sociology95780782Google Scholar
  12. Garland, D. 1997‘Governmentality’ and the problem of crime: Foucault, criminology, sociologyTheoretical Criminology1173214Google Scholar
  13. Goldhagen, D.J. 1996Hitler’s Willing Executioners: Ordinary Germans and the HolocaustLittle Brown and CompanyLondonGoogle Scholar
  14. Green, P.J., Ward, T. 2000State crime, human rights, and the limits of criminologySocial Justice27101115Google Scholar
  15. Hayward, K., Morrison, W. 2002Locating ‘Ground Zero’: Caught between the narratives of crime and warStrawson, J. eds. Law After Ground ZeroGlasshouse PressSydneyGoogle Scholar
  16. Joly, D., Kelly, L., Nettleton, C. 1997Refugees in Europe: The Hostile New AgendaMinority Rights GroupLondonGoogle Scholar
  17. Kauzlarich, D., Mullins, C.W., Matthews, R.A. 2003A complicity continuum of state crimeContemporary Justice Review6241254Google Scholar
  18. Kelman, H.C., Hamilton, V.L. 1989Crimes of Obedience: Toward a Social Psychology of Authority and ObedienceYale University PressLondonGoogle Scholar
  19. Modigliani, A. 1990Review of “Crimes of Obedience: Towards a social psychology of authority and responsibility”Contemporary Sociology19259260Google Scholar
  20. Reiner, R. 2000The Politics of the Police3Oxford University PressOxfordGoogle Scholar
  21. Smith, M. 1999Foley: The Spy Who Saved 10,000 JewsHodder & StoughtonLondonGoogle Scholar
  22. Weber, L. 2002The detention of asylum seekers: 20 reasons why criminologists should careCurrent Issues in Criminal Justice (Special Issue on Refugees and Criminology)14930Google Scholar
  23. Weber, L. 2003aDecisions to detain asylum seekers–routine, duty or individual choice?Gelsthorpe, L.Padfield, N. eds. Exercising Discretion:Decision-Making in the Criminal Justice System and Beyond.Willan PublishingUffculmeGoogle Scholar
  24. Weber, L. 2003bDown that wrong road: Discretion in decisions to detain asylum seekers arriving at UK portsThe Howard Journal of Criminal Justice42248262Google Scholar
  25. Weber, L., Gelsthorpe, L. 2000Deciding to Detain: How Decisions to Detain Asylum Seekers are Made at Ports of EntryInstitute of Criminology, University of CambridgeCambridgeGoogle Scholar
  26. Weber, L., Landman, T. 2002Deciding to Detain: The Organisational Context for Decisions to Detain Asylum Seekers at UK PortsHuman Rights Centre, University of EssexColchesterGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leanne Weber
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Western SydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations