Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Self-deception as a technique of neutralisation: an analysis of the subjective account of a white-collar criminal

  • Published:
Crime, Law and Social Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Neutralisation theory suggests that wrongdoers will rationalise their wrongdoing in such a way that allows them to maintain their views of themselves as moral law-abiding people. Though regularly applied since it first emerged as an aspect of differential association theory, it has rarely been extended beyond its original conceptualisation. Moreover, scholars rarely consider the subjective belief systems of criminals or their own accounts of their wrongdoing, when applying this theory. This is particularly true of white-collar criminals where there is a dearth of scholarship analysing how they respond to their own criminality. This article addresses these criticisms by analysing how self-deception may operate as a technique of neutralisation for white-collar criminals, anchoring and applying this extension in a specific case study on white-collar crime, from the subjective perspective of the criminal. It analyses the case of Kareem Serageldin, often considered the only banker jailed in the US for having some role in causing the financial crisis. The Serageldin case is used as a lens to extend and apply neutralisation theory in the field of white-collar crime, exploring how Serageldin distorted the facts of his wrongdoing, deceiving both himself and the court, to minimise his responsibility for his crime.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Healy, D., & McGrath, J. (2019). Simple rhetoric and complex punitiveness: federal criminal justice responses to white-collar criminality. Justice Quarterly, 36(7), 1258–1283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. McGrath, J., & Healy, D. (2020). Theorizing the drop in white-collar crime prosecutions: an ecological model. Punishment & Society, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474520939060.

  3. Pontell, H. N., Black, W. K., & Geis, G. (2014). Too big to fail, too powerful to jail? On the absence of criminal prosecutions after the 2008 financial meltdown. Crime, Law and Social Change, 61(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Haugh, T. (2014). The most senior wall street official: evaluating the state of financial crisis prosecutions. Virginia Law and Business Review, 9, 153.

    Google Scholar 

  5. McGrath, J. (2020). Why do good people do bad things? A multi-level analysis of individual, organizational, and structural causes of white-collar crime. 43. Seattle University Law Review, 525, 525–553.

  6. Sykes, G. M., & Matza, D. (1957). Techniques of neutralization: a theory of delinquency. American Sociological Review, 22(6), 664–670 667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Maruna, S., & Copes, H. (2005). What have we learned from five decades of neutralization research? Crime and Justice, 32, 221–320, 244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cressey, D. R. (1953). Other people's money; a study of the social psychology of embezzlement. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Benson, M. L. (1985). Denying the guilty mind: accounting for involvement in a white-collar crime. Criminology, 23(4), 583–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Murphy, P. R. (2012). Attitude, machiavellianism and the rationalization of misreporting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 37(4), 242–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Stadler, W. A., & Benson, M. L. (2012). Revisiting the guilty mind: the neutralization of white-collar crime. Criminal Justice Review, 37(4), 494–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Maruna, S., & Matravers, A. (2007). N= 1: criminology and the person. Theoretical Criminology, 11(4), 427–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. SEC. (2012). Complaint, Sec. Exch. Comm’n v. Serageldin, No. 1:12-CV-0796 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 01, 2012), 2012 WL 286878.

  14. Arraignment. (2013). Indictment, United States v. Serageldin, No. 1:12-CR-00090 (S.D.N.Y. May 10, 2013).

  15. Sentencing. (2013). Memorandum, United States v. Serageldin, 1:12-CR-00090 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 5, 2013).

  16. MacLeod, M. D., & Saunders, J. (2008). Retrieval inhibition and memory distortion: negative consequences of an adaptive process. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(1), 26–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Vrij, A. (2000). Detecting lies and deceit: the psychology of lying and implications for professional practice. Wiley.

  18. Sutherland, E. H. (1947). Principles of criminology (4th ed.).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sutherland, E. H. (1949). White collar crime. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

  20. Matza, D. (1964). Delinquency and drift. Wiley.

  21. Kaptein, M., & Van Helvoort, M. (2019). A model of neutralization techniques. Deviant Behavior, 40(10), 1260–1285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Klockars, C. B. (1975). The professional fence. London: Tavistock Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Minor, W. W. (1981). Techniques of neutralization: a reconceptualization and empirical examination. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 18(2), 295–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Cromwell, P., & Thurman, Q. (2003). The devil made me do it: use of neutralizations by shoplifters. Deviant Behavior, 24(6), 535–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Agnew, R. (2006). Storylines as a neglected cause of crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 43(2), 119–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Cavanagh, K., Dobash, R. E., Dobash, R. P., & Lewis, R. (2001). ‘Remedial work’: men's strategic responses to their violence against intimate female partners. Sociology, 35(3), 695–714.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1992). Discursive psychology (Vol. 8). Sage.

  28. Banerjee, S. C., Hay, J. L., & Greene, K. (2012). College students' cognitive rationalizations for tanning bed use: an exploratory study. Archives of Dermatology, 148(6), 761–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. D'argembeau, A., & Van der Linden, M. (2008). Remembering pride and shame: self-enhancement and the phenomenology of autobiographical memory. Memory, 16(5), 538–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Von Hippel, W., Lakin, J. L., & Shakarchi, R. J. (2005). Individual differences in motivated social cognition: the case of self-serving information processing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(10), 1347–1357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Snyder, C. R., & Higgins, R. L. (1988). Excuses: their effective role in the negotiation of reality. Psychological Bulletin, 104(1), 23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Saucier, D. A., Miller, C. T., & Doucet, N. (2005). Differences in helping whites and blacks: a meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9(1), 2–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Valdesolo, P., & DeSteno, D. (2008). The duality of virtue: deconstructing the moral hypocrite. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(5), 1334–1338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 364–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Gur, R. C., & Sackeim, H. A. (1979). Self-deception: a concept in search of a phenomenon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(2), 147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Von Hippel, W., & Trivers, R. (2011). The evolution and psychology of self-deception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34(1), 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Rogers, J. W., & Buffalo, M. D. (1974). Fighting back: nine modes of adaptation to a deviant label. Social Problems, 22(1), 101–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1971). Status passage. Mill Valley.

  39. Eisinger, J. (2014). Why only one top banker went to jail for the financial crisis. NY Times Mag. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/04/magazine/only-one-top-banker-jail-financial-crisis.html. Accessed 13 Mar 2020.

  40. Needleman, M. L., & Needleman, C. (1979). Organizational crime: two models of criminogenesis. The Sociological Quarterly, 20(4), 517–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Ashforth, B. E., & Anand, V. (2003). The normalization of corruption in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 1–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Miller, D. T. (2001). Disrespect and the experience of injustice. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 527–553, 537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Aronson, E. (1992). The return of the repressed: dissonance theory makes a comeback. Psychological Inquiry, 3(4), 303–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Felson, R. B., & Ribner, S. A. (1981). An attributional approach to accounts and sanctions for criminal violence. Social Psychology Quarterly, 44(2), 137–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Soltes, E. (2016). Why they do it: inside the mind of the white-collar criminal. Public Affairs.

  46. Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Messick, D. M. (2004). Ethical fading: the role of self-deception in unethical behavior. Social Justice Research, 17(2), 223–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. McGrath, J. (2019). Regulating white-collar crime in Ireland: an analysis using the lens of governmentality. Crime, Law and Social Change, 72(4), 445–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. McGrath, J. (2020). Walk softly and carry no stick: culture, opportunity and irresponsible risk-taking in the Irish banking sector. European Journal of Criminology, 17(1), 86–105.

  49. McAdams, D. P. (1993). The stories we live by: personal myths and the making of the self. Guilford Press.

  50. Maruna, S., & Mann, R. E. (2006). A fundamental attribution error? Rethinking cognitive distortions. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 11(2), 155–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Van Lange, P. A. M., & Sedikides, C. (1998). Being more honest but not necessarily more intelligent than others: generality and explanations for the Muhammad Ali effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28(4), 675–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Tenbrunsel, A. E., Diekmann, K. A., Wade-Benzoni, K. A., & Bazerman, M. H. (2010). The ethical mirage: a temporal explanation as to why we are not as ethical as we think we are. Research in Organizational Behavior, 30, 153–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Moore, C. (2016). Always the hero to ourselves: The role of self-deception in unethical behavior. In J.W. van Prooijen & P. A. M. Van Lange (Eds.), Cheating, corruption, and concealment (pp. 98–119). Cambridge University Press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sutherland School of Law, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland

    Joe McGrath

Authors
  1. Joe McGrath
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joe McGrath.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McGrath, J. Self-deception as a technique of neutralisation: an analysis of the subjective account of a white-collar criminal. Crime Law Soc Change 75, 415–432 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-021-09933-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-021-09933-6

Search

Navigation