The penalization of protest under neoliberalism: managing resistance through punishment

  • Ignacio González-Sánchez
  • Manuel Maroto-Calatayud
Article

Abstract

The repression of anti-austerity protests in Spain from 2011 to 2014 constitutes an example of how neoliberal developments are facilitated by the penal system as it limits political resistances to the imposition of precarious working conditions and social cuts. The limits imposed on contentious politics are both material (consisting of banning acts that are prominent in social movement’s repertoire of contention, fining demonstrators, etc.) and symbolic (consisting of transforming the meaning of legitimate politics by imposing new legal and political definitions). This case study is used to illustrate the interconnection between labor markets, social policies and the repression of social protest, and to elaborate on Wacquant’s approach to the relationship between punishment and other social institutions. It is at such times of political and economic crisis when institutional interconnections seem particularly exposed, arguably enabling more profound analyses.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This paper benefited from funding from research projects DER2015-64403-P, DER2014-59743-P, and HAR2016-75098-R, from the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness.

References

  1. 1.
    Jiménez Sánchez, M. (2011). La normalización de la protesta: el caso de las manifestaciones en España (1980–2008). Madrid: CIS.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wacquant, L. (2009). Punishing the poor. The neoliberal government of social insecurity. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wacquant, L. (1999). Prisons of poverty (p. 2009). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lappi-Seppälä, T. (2011). Explaining imprisonment in Europe. Europena Journal of Criminology, 8(4), 303–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cid, J., & Larrauri, E. (2009). Development of crime, social change, mass media, crime policy, sanctioning practice and their impact on prison population rates. Sistema Penal y Violência, 1(1), 1–21.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Aebi, M., Tiago, M., & Burkhardt, C. (2015). SPACE I–Council of Europe Annual Penal Statistics: Prison populations. Survey 2014. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Castel, R. (1995). From manual workers to wage laborers: Transformation of the social question. New Brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rothman, D. (1971). The discovery of the asylum: Social order and disorder in the New Republic. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Downes, D., & Hansen, K. (2006). Welfare and punishment in comparative perspective. In S. Armstrong & L. McAra (Eds.), Perspectives on punishment: The contours of control (pp. 133–154). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lappi-Seppälä, T. (2008). Trust, welfare, and political culture: Explaining differences in National Penal Policies. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (volume 37) (pp. 313–387). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Garland, D. (1990). Punishment and modern society: A study in social theory. Chicago: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Foucault, M. (1975). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (p. 2012). New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fernández, J. M. (2005). La noción de violencia simbólica en la obra de Pierre Bourdieu: una aproximación crítica. Cuadernos de Trabajo Social, 18, 7–31.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Daems, T. (2008). Making sense of penal change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    González-Sánchez, I. (2012). La reconfiguración del Estado y del castigo. In I. González-Sánchez (Ed.), Teoría social, marginalidad urbana y Estado penal: aproximaciones al trabajo de Loïc Wacquant (pp.).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Garland, D. (2013). Penality and the penal state. Criminology, 51(3), 475–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Garland, D. (2001). The culture of control. Crime and social order in contemporary society. Oxford: Oxford Univeristy Press.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wacquant, L. (2011). Neoliberal penality at work: A response to my Spanish critics. Revista Española de Sociología, 15, 115–123.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zimring, F., & Hawins, G. (1991). The scale of imprisonment. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Abbott, A. (2011). Book review on ‘punishing the poor. American Journal of Sociology, 116(4), 1356–1360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lacey, N. (2011). Differentiating among penal states. British Journal of Sociology, 61(4), 778–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lacey, N. (2013). Punishment, (neo)liberalism and social democracy. In J. Simon & R. Sparks (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of punishment and society (pp. 260–279). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Harcourt, B. (2011). The illusion of free markets. Punishment and the myth of natural order. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    González-Sánchez, I. (2017). For and against the political economy of punishment: Thoughts on Bourdieu and punishment. In D. Melossi, M. Sozzo, & J. A. Brandariz (Eds.), The political economy of punishment today: Visions, debates and challenges (pp. 65–86). New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wacquant, L. (2014). Marginality, ethinicty and penality in the Neo-Liberal City: An analytic cartography. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 37(10), 1687–1711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nelken, D. (2010). Denouncing the penal state. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 10(4), 329–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Measor, L. (2012). ‘Loïc Wacquant, gender and cultures of resistance. In P. Squires & J. Lea (Eds.), Criminalisation and advanced marginality. critically exploring the work of Loïc Wacquant (pp. 129–150). Bristol: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wacquant, L. (2000). Body and soul: Notebooks of an apprentice boxer (Vol. 2003). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Fernández, J. M. (2012). Cuerpo, mente y gueto. Una reapropiación creativa de la teoría de la práctica de Pierre Bourdieu. In I. González Sánchez (Ed.), Teoría social, marginalidad urbana y Estado penal: aproximaciones al trabajo de Loïc Wacquant (pp. 51–88). Madrid: Dykinson.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bourdieu, P. (1980). The logic of practice (p. 1990). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Goodman, P., Page, J., & Phelps, M. (2017). Breaking the Pendullum. The long struggle over criminal justice. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Braithwaite, J. (2003). What’s wrong with the sociology of punishment? Theoretical Criminology, 7(1), 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ministerio de Interior. (2013). Anuario estadístico. Resource document. http://www.interior.gob.es/documents/642317/1204854/Anuario_estadistico_2012_okkk.pdf/00ee01c7-3122-496a-a023-22829653e6c0. Accessed 1 Nov 2015.
  35. 35.
    Della Porta, D., & Diani, M. (1998). Social movements: An introduction (p. 2006). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Della Porta, D., & Reiter, H. (1998). The policing of protest in western democracies. In D. Della Porta & H. Reiter (Eds.), Policing protest: The control of mass demonstrations in western democracies. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Faraldo, P. (2014). La despenalización de las faltas: entre la agravación de las penas y el aumento de la represión administrativa. Indret, 3, 2014.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Barkan, S. E. (2006). Criminal prosecution and the legal control of protest. Mobilization, 11(2), 181–194.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Feeley, M. (1979). The process is the punishment. Handling cases in a lower criminal court. New York: Sage.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Oliver Olmo, P. (2013). ¿Qué es la burorrepresión?. In Oliver Olmo P. (coord.). Burorrepresión. Sanción administrativa y control social (pp. 11–28). Albacete: Bomarzo.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Maroto-Calatayud, M. (2013), Ciudades de excepción: seguridad ciudadana y civismo como instrumentos de burorrepresión de la protesta. In Oliver Olmo P. (coord.). Burorrepresión. Sanción administrativa y control social (pp. 29–64). Albacete: Bomarzo.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Landa Arambarri, B. (1995). Ley orgánica... una estrategia preventiva de control político. In Muñagorri Laguia I. (Ed.), Protección de la Seguridad Ciudadana. Oñati: OIISL.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    El País. (2011). Cómo disolver una sentada. Elpais.com.
  44. 44.
    Jaime-Jiménez, Ó. (1996). Orden público y cambio político en España. Revista Internacional de Sociología, 15, 143.167.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Palacios Cerezales, D. (2003). Confraternizar con la policía. Unpublished working paper.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    The Guardian. (2015). Journalists take fight against Spanish 'Gag Law' to European court’. Theguardian.com.
  47. 47.
    Benedicto Salmerón, R. A. (2015). Gubernamentalidad policial de subjetividades/identidades en torno al 15M. El tratamiento del enemigo (Catalunya, 2011–2012). Teoría y Crítica de la Psicología, 6, 297–348.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Thompson, E. P. (1975). The crime of anonymity. In D. Hay, P. Linebaugh, J. Rule, E. P. Thompson, & C. Winslow (Eds.), Albion's fatal tree: Crime and society in eighteenth-century England (pp. 255–344). London: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    El Diario. (2015). Interior compra gas lacrimógeno por 1,3 millones a la familia de un exdiputado del PP, Eldiario.es.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Blay, E. (2013). El control policial de las protestas en España. InDret 4.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Comision Legal Sol. (2015). Las verguenzas de Cifuentes: Cuatro años al frente de Delegación de Gobierno, https://legal15m.wordpress.com
  52. 52.
    O’Malley, P. (2009). Theorizing fines. Punishment and Society, 11(1), 67–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Davenport, C. (2007). State repression and political order. Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Earl, J. (2006). Introduction: Repression and the social control of protest. Mobilization, 11(2), 129–143.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Lukes, S., & Scull, A. (2013). Introduction to the second edition. In S. Lukes & A. Scull (Eds.), Durkheim and the law (2nd ed., pp. 1–40). Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Garland, D. (1983). Durkheim’s theory of punishment: A critique. In D. Garland & P. Young (Eds.), The power to punish. Contemporary penality and social analysis (pp. 37–61). London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Romanos, E. (2011). Epílogo. Retos emergentes, debates recientes y los movimientos sociales en España. In D. Della Porta & M. Diani (Eds.), Los movimientos sociales (pp. 315–346). Madrid: Complutense and CIS.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    ABC. (2012). La Delegación del Gobierno ve a ultras de izquierdas y de derechas detrás de ‘Ocupa el Congreso’. ABC.es.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Martín García, Ó. (2013). La burorrepresión del nuevo ciclo de protestas. In Oliver Olmo P. (coord.). Burorrepresión. Sanción administrativa y control social (pp. 65–93). Albacete: Bomarzo.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Calvo García, M. (1995). Políticas de seguridad y transformaciones del Derecho. In I. Muñagorri Laguia (Ed.), La protección de la seguridad ciudadana (pp. 95–134). Oñati: The Oñati I.I.S.L..Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Simon, J. (2007). Governing through crime: How the war on crime transformed American democracy and created a culture of fear. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (1993). From ruling class to the field of power: An interview with Pierre Bourdieu on La noblesse d’État. Theory, Culture and Society, 10, 19–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Hirst, P. Q. (1975). Marx and Engels on law, crime and morality. In I. Taylor, P. Walton, & J. Young (Eds.), Critical criminology (pp. 203–232). London and Boston: Routedge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Maroto-Calatayud, M. (2016). Punitive decriminalization? The repression of political dissent through administrative law and nuisance ordinances in Spain. In Persak N. (dir.). Regulation and Social Control of Incivilities. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Ruidíaz García, C. (1994). Loes españoles ante la justicia penal: actitudes y expectativas. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 67, 219-240.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Simon, J., & Sparks, R. (2013). Introduction. Punishment and society: The emergence of an academic field. In J. Simon & R. Sparks (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of punishment and society (pp. 1–21). London: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of LawUniversity of GironaGironaSpain
  2. 2.School of Legal and Social SciencesUniversity of Castilla-La ManchaToledoSpain

Personalised recommendations