Crime, Law and Social Change

, Volume 69, Issue 1, pp 91–107 | Cite as

Marital rape immunity in India: historical anomaly or cultural defence?

Article

Abstract

This paper will examine the legal position India holds today with respect to marital rape. It will first study how India’s criminal law has been shaped over the years: starting with its colonial common law inheritance from England, and with the development of the criminal law through its inclusion in Macaulay’s Code and continued retention in the Indian Penal Code 1860 (IPC). Outside the IPC, the law has not stood still. There have been recent reforms seeking to advance women’s rights to be free from family violence, such as The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act 2005 (PWDVA). After tracing the history of India’s legal responses, the paper will closely investigate the influence of broader Indian culture (claims based on patriarchy and religion) on rape law reform, finally making a case for abolition of the immunity based on the fundamental principle of equality, drawing on arguments from the human rights guarantees included in the Constitution of India, and India’s international legal obligations under the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW).

Notes

Acknowledgements

Based on a 2015 paper submission for LAWS4114 Advanced Research as part of the Bachelor of Laws (Honours) program at TC Beirne School of Law, The University of Queensland. Thank you to Dr. Ashutosh Misra and Zoe Brereton for their invaluable help and guidance. Special thanks to Professor Simon Bronitt, without whom this paper would not have been written.

References

  1. 1.
    Bedi, K. (2015). The sordid reality of marital rape. NDTV. http://www.ndtv.com/opinion/the-sordid-reality-of-marital-rape-760245.
  2. 2.
    Timmons, H., & Gottipati, S. (2012). Woman dies after a gang rape that galvanised India. The New York Times (online). http://www.Nytimes.Com/2012/12/29/world/asia/condition-worsens-for-victim-of-gang-rape-in-india.Html?_r=0 .
  3. 3.
    Shrivastava, A. (2013). Marital rape: A legalised sin. Indian Journal of Applied Research, 12(3), 249–251.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bronitt, S., & Misra, A. (2014). Reforming sexual offences in India: Lessons in human rights and comparative law. Griffith Asia Quarterly, 2, 37–56.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Toole, K. (2011). Marital rape in South Australia: R v P, GA. Criminal Law Journal, 35(4), 237–251.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dubber, M. D. (2006). Comparative Criminal Law. In Reimann, M. & Zimmermann, R. (eds). (2006). Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hale, M. (1736). The history of the pleas of the crown. London: Professional Books.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Anderson, M. (1998). Lawful wife, unlawful sex – Examining the effect of the criminalisation of marital rape in England and the Republic of Ireland. The Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law, 27, 139–166.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Regina v Clarence. (1889). 22 Q.B.D. 23.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    R v Clark. (1949). 33 Cr. App. R. 216.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    R v. Miller. (1954). 2 Q.B. 282, 290.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bronitt, S., & McSherry, B. (2010). Principles of criminal law (3rd ed.). Sydney: Thomson Reuters.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    R v R. (1991). UKHL 12.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    R v R. (1992). 1 A.C. 599.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    R v L. (1991). 174 CLR 379.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    R v P, GA. (2010). 109 SASR 1.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bottomley, S., & Bronitt, S. (2012). Law In Context (pp. 46–51). Annandale: The Federation Press.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Giles, M. (1991). Judicial law making in the criminal courts: The case of marital rape. Criminal Law Journal, 6, 407–417.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wolpert, S. (1991). India. Berkeley: University of California Press. Chan, W., Wright, B., & Yeo, S. (eds). (2011).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wing-Cheong Chan, Barry Wright and Stanley Yeo (eds), Codification, Macaulay and the Indian Penal Code: The Legacies and Modern Challenges of Criminal Law Reform. Surrey: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Peers, D. (2013). Codification, Macaulay and the Indian Penal Code: The Legacies and Modern Challenges of Criminal Law Reform ed. by Wing-Cheong Chan, Barry Wright, and Stanley Yeo (Review). Victorian Studies, 55(4), 749–751Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dhagamwar, V. (1992). Law, power and justice: The protection of personal rights in the Indian Penal Code. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Trivedi, I. (2014). India in love: Marriage and sexuality in the 21 st century. New Delhi: Aleph Book Company.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Justice Verma Committee. (2013). Report of the Committee on Amendments to Criminal Law. New Delhi.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mandal, S. (2014). The impossibility of marital rape: Contestations around marriage, sex, violence and the law in contemporary India. Australian Feminist Studies, 29(81), 255–272.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Brereton, Z. (2016). Perpetuating myths of women as false complainants in rape cases in India: Culture v. The law. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 1–22.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Chhichhia, B. (2012). Gender rights in post-colonial societies: A comparative study of Kenya and India. African Journal of Political Science and International Relations, 6(8), 204–216.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Naidu, P. (2013). Domestic violence against women in India: A human rights violation. Asia Pacific Journal of Social Sciences, 5(1), 135–151.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
  30. 30.
    The World Health Organisation. (2014). Violence against women: Intimate partner and sexual violence against women. Fact sheet, no. 239. http://www.Who.Int/ mediacentre/factsheets/fs239/en/.
  31. 31.
    Douglas, H., & Fitzgerald, R. (2013). Legal processes and gendered violence: Cross-applications for domestic violence protection orders. University of New South Wales Law Journal, 36(1), 56–87.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Marital Rape Can’t Be Applied to India. (2015). The Times of India, 9. Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Manchandia, P. (2005). Practical steps towards eliminating dowry and bride-burning in India. Tulane Journal of International and Comparative Law, 13, 305–332.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Abeyratne, R., & Jain, D. (2013). Domestic violence legislation in India: The pitfalls of a human rights approach to gender equality. Journal of Gender, Social Policy & The Law, 21, 333–378.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Bhat, M., & Ullman, S. (2014). Examining Marital Violence in India: Review and Recommendations for Future Research and Practice. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 15(1), 57–74Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sarkar, L. (1994). Rape: A human rights versus a patriarchal interpretation. Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 1, 69–92.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sharma, R., Pardasani, R., & Nandram, S. (2014). The problem of rape in India: A multi-dimensional analysis. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 7, 362–379.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Babu, B., & Kar, S. (2009). Domestic violence against women in eastern India: A population-based study on prevalence and related issues. BMC Public Health, 9, 129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    International Centre for Research on Women. Evolving Men: Initial Results from the International Men and Gender Equality Survey (IMAGES). http://www.icrw.org/sites/default/files/publications/Evolving-Men-Initial-Results-from-the-International-Men-and-Gender-Equality-Survey-IMAGES-1.pdf.
  40. 40.
    Kehn, A., & Ruthig, J.C. (2013). Perceptions of gender discrimination across six decades: The moderating roles of gender and age. Sex Roles 69(5), 289–296.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Diemer, K. (2014). Women’s safety is a men’s issue: Men’s attitudes to violence against women and what that means for men. http://www.whiteribbon.org.au/uploads/media/Research_series/Diemar_Womens_Safety_is_a_Mens_Issue.pdf.
  42. 42.
    Komath, R. (2013). Religion as a barrier in Women’s empowerment. The Hindu (online). http://www.thehindu.com/books/books-reviews/religion-as-a-barrier-in-womens-empowerment/article5364865.ece.
  43. 43.
    Bonner, A. (1994). Democracy in India: A hollow shell. Washington, DC: The American University Press.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Brekke, T. (2009). The concept of religion and the debate on the rights of women in the constitutional debates of India. Nordic Journal of Religion and Society, 22(1), 71–85Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Garg, M., & Singla, N. (2013). Marital rape under Indian law: A study. International Journal in Management and Social Science, 2(1), 59–68.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    The Constitution of India 1949 (India).Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Schelong, K. M. (1994). Domestic violence and the state: Responses to and rationales for spousal battering, marital rape and stalking. Marquette Law Review, 78, 79–120.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Blackstone, W. (1765). Commentaries on the Laws of England (Vol 1). Oxford: Claredon Press.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Easteal, P. (2001). Less than equal: Women and the Australian legal system. Sydney: Butterworths.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Easteal, P. (2010). Women and the law in Australia. Sydney: Butterworths.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    International Centre for Research on Women. Annex 4: Overview of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act 2005. http://www.icrw.org/files/images/Reducing-HIV-Stigma-and-Gender-Based-Violence-Toolkit-for-Health-Care-Providers-in-India-Annex-4.pdf.
  52. 52.
    Douglas, H., & Godden, L. (2003). The decriminalisation of domestic violence: Examining the interaction between the criminal law and domestic violence. Criminal Law Journal, 27, 32–43.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Temkin, J. (2002). Rape and the legal process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Srinivasan, P., & Lee, G. R. (2004). The dowry system in northern India: Women's attitudes and social change. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(5), 1108–1117.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Dowry Prohibition Act 1961 (India).Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Dowry Prohibition (Amendment) Act 1984 (India).Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Dowry Prohibition (Amendment) Act 1986 (India).Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    The Criminal Law (Second Amendment) Act 1983 (India).Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    India Marital Rape Victims’ Lonely Battle for Justice. (2015). BBC News (online). http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-32810834.
  60. 60.
    Pantham, T. (1983). Thinking with Mahatma Gandhi: Beyond liberal democracy. Political Theory, 11(2), 165–188.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Gill, G. N. (2012). Human rights and the environment in India: Access through public interest litigation. Environmental Law Review, 14, 200–218.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Liviatan, O. (2009). Judicial activism and religion-based tensions in India and Israel. Arizona Journal of International & Comparative Law, 26(3), 583–621.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Delhi High Court Rejects PIL Seeking Marital Rape Be Made Criminal Offence. (2015). DNA. http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-delhi-high-court-rejects-pil-seeking-marital-rape-be-made-criminal-offence-2062214.
  64. 64.
    Anil Dutt Sharma v Union Of India & Ors. (2015). No. 1045/2015. Delhi HC.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Rihana v Azzimuddin & Ors. (2012). DDC.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Crime No. 1369/2015 of Varappuzha … vs Joji Jose. (2014). Kerala HC.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Shivdas, M., & Coleman, S. (2010). Without prejudice: CEDAW and the determination of women’s rights in a legal and cultural context. London: Commonwealth Secretariat.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Jivan, V., & Forster, C. (2009). Challenging conventions: In pursuit of greater legislative compliance with ‘CEDAW’ in the Pacific. Melbourne Journal of International Law, 10(2), 655–690.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Kirby, M. (1999). Domestic implementation of international human rights norms. Journal of Human Rights, 5(2), 109.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Agarwal, S. K. (2010). Implementation of International Law in India: Role of Judiciary (unpublished). McGill University.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    General Assembly resolution 48/104. Declaration on the Elimination of Violence against Women. (1993). A/RES/48/104.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    CEDAW Committee. (2007). Concluding Comments of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women: India. UN doc CEDAW/C/IND/CO/3.Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    CEDAW Committee. (2014). Concluding Comments of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women: India. CEDAW/C/IND/CO/4–5.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    CEDAW Committee. (2014). List of issues and questions in relation to the combined fourth and fifth periodic reports of India, Addendum: Replies of India. CEDAW/C/IND/Q/4-5/add.1.Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Bhandare, S., & Bhandare, M. C. (2010). Struggle for gender justice: Justice Sunanda Bahndare memorial lectures. New Delhi: Penguin Group.Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Bronitt, S., & McSherry, B. (2017). Principles of criminal law (4th ed.). Sydney: Thomson Reuters.Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Talwar, R. (2013). Courting injustice: The Nirbhaya case and its aftermath. New Delhi: Hay House India.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    CEDAW Committee. (2008). Concluding Comments of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women: Lebanon. CEDAW/C/LBN/CO/3.Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Martin, E., Taft, C., & Resick, P. (2007). A review of marital rape. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12(3), 329.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The University of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations