Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Explaining fraud deviancy attenuation in the United Kingdom

  • Published:
Crime, Law and Social Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fraud is one of the most costly crimes to society. There have been a number of studies documenting the low priority and resources allocated to fraud, but there has been little attempt to conceptualise the processes which lead to this. This paper develops a concept that is the antithesis to deviancy amplification, deviancy attenuation, to examine why the level of resources and interest in fraud are not commensurate with the size of the problem. The paper also develops two further reverse concepts to further explain attenuation: de-labelling and immoral phlegmatism. Empirical evidence is offered in the form of case studies, statistical and survey data to support the arguments presented. The paper also illustrates these arguments through the comparison of the response to benefits fraud in the United Kingdom, which can be considered the one exception amongst frauds where labelling, moral panics and deviancy amplification occurs; explained by some Marxist commentators as a consequence of it being a lower class crime actively pursued by the powerful.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ACFE. (2012). Report to the Nations on Occupational Fraud and Abuse 2012 Global Study. Austin: ACFE.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anderton, B., & Kiely, J. (1988). Employee Theft. Personnel Review, 17(5), 37–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Association of British Insurers (2003). What is Dishonest? http://www.abi.org.uk. Accessed 26 November 2007.

  4. Australian Bureau of Statistics (2012). Personal Fraud 2010–2011. http://www.abs.gov.au/ ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/65767D57E11FC149CA2579E40012057F?opendocument. Accessed 19 February 2012.

  5. Barak, G. (2012). Theft of a Nation: Wall St Looting and Federal Regulatory Colluding. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Becker, H. (1963). Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Berman, G. (2012). Police Service Strength. London: House of Commons Library.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Blunt G and Hand D J (2007). Estimating the Iceberg: How Much Fraud is there in the UK? http://qfrmc.imaa.ic.ac.uk/qfrmc/23nov07/talks/gordon/.pdf. Accessed 16 December 2008.

  9. Bottomley, A. K., & Coleman, C. A. (1981). Understanding Crime Rates. Farnborough: Saxon House.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, Shame and Integration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Brand, S., & Price, R. (2000). The Economic and Social Costs of Crime. Home Office Research Study 217. London: Home Office.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Brooks, G., Button, M., & Gee, J. (2012). The scale of healthcare fraud: a global evaluation. Security Journal, 25, 76–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Button, M. (2011). Fraud Investigation and the ‘Flawed Architecture’ of Counter Fraud Entities in the United Kingdom. International Journal of Law Crime and Justice, 39, 249–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Button, M., Blackbourn, D., Lewis, C. and Shepherd, D. (Forthcoming). Uncovering the Hidden Cost of Staff Fraud: An Assessment of 45 Cases in the UK. Journal of Financial Crime.

  15. Button, M., Gee, J., & Brooks, G. (2012). Measuring the cost of fraud: an opportunity for the new competitive advantage. Journal of Financial Crime, 19(1), 65–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Button, M., Lewis, C., & Tapley, J. (2014). Not a victimless crime: the impact of fraud on individual victims and their families. Security Journal, 27(1), 36–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Button, M., & Leys, C. (2013). Healthcare Fraud in the New NHS Market - A Threat to Patient Care. London: Centre for Health and the Public Interest.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Button, M., Tapley, J., & Lewis, C. (2013). The ‘fraud justice network’ and the infra-structure of support for individual fraud victims in England and Wales. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 13, 37–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Coffey, A. (2014). Real Voices: Child Exploitation in Greater Manchester. An Independent Report by Ann Coffey, MP, October 2014. http://anncoffeymp.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Real-Voices-Final.pdf Accessed 25th November 2014.

  20. Cohen, S. (1972). Folk devils and moral panics: The creation of the mods and rockers. London: MacGibbon and Kee.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Coleman, C., & Moynihan, J. (1996). Understanding crime data: Haunted by the dark figure. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Connor, S. (2007). We’re onto you: a critical examination of the department for work and pensions’ targeting benefit fraud’ campaign. Critical Social Policy, 27, 231–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Cook, D. (1989). Rich law, poor law: Different responses to tax and supplementary benefit fraud. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Cook, D. (1997). Social divisions of welfare: Tax and social security fraud. In A. Robertson (Ed.), Unemployment, social security and the social division of welfare: A Festschrift in Honour of Adrian Sinfield. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Daily Mirror (2012). Call this justice? City banker steals £1.4 m… no charge. Shop worker steals £10 k… 9 months http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/call-this-justice-city-banker-steals-663079. Accessed 26 February 2014.

  26. Dean, H., & Melrose, M. (1997). Manageable discord: Fraud and resistance in the social security system. Social Policy and Administration, 31, 103–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Department for Work and Pensions (DWP). (2010). Tackling fraud and error in the benefit and tax credit systems. London: Department for Work and Pensions.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ditton, J. (1977). Part time crime: An ethnography of fiddling and pilferage. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Dubourg, R., & Hamed, J. (2005). The economic and social costs of crime against individuals and households 2003–04. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Federal Trade Commission (2007). 2006 Identity Theft Survey Report. http://www.ftc.gov/ os/2007/11/SynovateFinalReportIDTheft2006.pdf. Accessed 16 March 2010.

  31. Financial Services Authority (2012) Final Notice. http://www.fsa.gov.uk/static/pubs/final/ravi-sinha.pdf. Accessed 12 September 2013.

  32. Fitzgerald, M. (2014) Falling Crime or Flawed Statistics?. Presentation at BSC/Mannheim seminar, LSE, 15 January 2014.

  33. Fraud Review Team (2006) Final Report. London: The Legal Secretariat to the Law Offices. http://www.attorneygeneral.gov.uk/Fraud%20Review/Fraud%20Review%20Final%20Report%20July%202006.pdf. Accessed 8 August 2011.

  34. Gannon, R., & Doig, A. (2010). Ducking the answer? Fraud strategies and police resources. Policing and Society, 20, 39–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Gee, J., Button, M., & Bassett, P. (2011). Fraud Loss Measurement - A Short Guide to the Methodology and Approach. London: PKF.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Golding, P. (1999). Thinking the unthinkable: Welfare reform and the media. In B. Franklin (Ed.), Social policy, the media and misrepresentation (pp. 146–159). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Golding, P., & Middleton, S. (1982). Images of welfare. Oxford: Martin Robertson.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Gordon, M. (Executive Producer) & Littlewood, D. (Presenter) (2013.) Jones/Stuart [Television series episode]. In A. Kreps (Series Producer), Saints and Scroungers. London: BBC 2.

  39. Grover, C. (2005). Advertising social security fraud. Benefits, 13, 199–205.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Hatch, G. & McMurtry, V. A. (2010). Improper Payments Information Act of 2002: Background, Implementation, and Assessment. Congressional Research Service, RL34164, October 04, 2010.

  41. Hoare, J. (2007). Deceptive evidence: Challenges in measuring fraud. In M. Hough & M. Maxwell (Eds.), Surveying Crime in the 21st Century (pp. 263–279). Cullompton: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Home Office (2012). Number of offences reported, recorded and no-crimed by police force area table. http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/publications/science-research-Number of offences statistics/research-statistics/crime-research/prc-no-crime/. Accessed 08 January 2013.

  43. Home Office (2013). Crime Against Businesses: Headline Findings from the2012 Commercial Victimisation Survey. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system /uploads/ attachment_data/file/147935/crime-business-prem-2012-pdf.pdf. Accessed February 19 2014.

  44. Huff, R., Desilets, C., & Kane, J. (2010). The 2010 National Public Survey on White Collar Crime. Fairmont: National White Collar Crime Center.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Insurance Fraud Bureau. (2013). ‘Crash-for-cash’ Putting the Brakes on Fraud. London: Insurance Fraud Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Jewkes, Y. (2011). Media and Crime (2nd ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Karstedt, S., & Farrall, S. (2006). The moral economy of everyday life. British Journal of Criminology, 46(6), 1011–1036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Koffman, L. (1996). Crime surveys and victims of crime. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Levi, M. (1986). Investigating fraud. Policing, 2, 196–211.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Levi, M. (1987). Regulating fraud: White collar crime and the criminal process. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Levi, M. (2006). The media construction of financial white-collar crimes. British Journal of Criminology, 46, 1037–1057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Levi, M., & Burrows, J. (2008). Measuring the impact of fraud in the UK: a conceptual and empirical journey. British Journal of Criminology, 48, 293–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Maguire, M. (2012). Criminal statistics and the construction of crime. In M. Maguire, R. Morgan, & R. Reiner (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Criminology (5th ed., pp. 206–244). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  54. Mann, D., & Sutton, M. (1998). Net crime: more change in the organisation of thieving. British Journal of Criminology, 38, 202–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Mars, G. (1983). Cheats at work: An anthropology of workplace crime. London: Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Murji, K. (2001). Moral Panic. In E. McLaughlin & J. Muncie (Eds.), The Sage Dictionary of Criminology. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  57. National Fraud Authority. (2010). Annual Fraud Indicator. London: National Fraud Authority.

  58. National Fraud Authority. (2012). Annual Fraud Indicator. London: National Fraud Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  59. National Fraud Authority. (2013). Annual Fraud Indicator. London: National Fraud Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Office for National Statistics (2014). Crime in England and Wales, Year Ending June 2014. http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/dcp171778_380538.pdf Accessed 26 November 2014.

  61. Office of Fair Trading, (2006). Fraud review final report: A consultation response by the Office of Fair Trading. London: Office of Fair Trading.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Pontell, H. N., Black, W. K., & Geis, G. (2014). Too big to fail, too powerful to jail? On the absence of criminal prosecutions after the 2008 financial meltdown. Crime, Law and Social Change, 61(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Shury, J., Speed, M., Vivian, D., Kuechel, A., & Nicholas, S. (2005). Crime against retail and manufacturing premises: Findings from the 2002 commercial victimization survey. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Slapper, G., & Tombs, S. (1999). Corporate Crime. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Smith, A. (2006). Crime statistics: An independent review. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Sutherland, E. (1949). White Collar Crime. New York: Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Sutton, M. (2007). Improving national crime surveys: With a focus upon strangely neglected offenders and their offences, including fraud, high-tech crimes, and handling stolen goods. In M. Hough & M. Maxwell (Eds.), Surveying Crime in the 21st Century (pp. 243–261). Cullompton: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Tannenbaum, F. (1938). Crime and the Community. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Tombs, S., & Whyte, D. (2007). Safety Crimes. Cullumpton: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Tunley, M. (2014). Mandating the measurement of fraud: Legislating against loss. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  71. Tunley, M. (2011). Uncovering the iceberg: Mandating the measurement of fraud in the UK. International Journal of Law Crime and Justice, 39(3), 190–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Tunley, M. (2011). Need, greed or opportunity? An examination of who commits benefit fraud and why they do it. Security Journal, 24, 302–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. US Department of Justice (2011). Identity Theft Reported by Households 2005–2010. http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/pub/pdf/itrh0510.pdf. Accessed 07 February 2013.

  74. Walker, M. A. (1995). Statistics of offences. In M. A. Walker (Ed.), Interpreting crime statistics (pp. 4–23). Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Whyte, D. (2009). Crimes of the powerful. Buckingham: McGraw Hill Education.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Will, S., Pontell, H. N., & Brotherton, D. C. (2013). How they got away with it: White collar criminals and the financial meltdown. NY: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Wilkins, L. (1964). Social deviance: Social policy, action and research. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Wood, C. (2014). Back to Basics. Public Finance. December 2014, 35–37. http://www.publicfinance.co.uk/features/2014/11/back-to-basics-on-welfare/ Accessed 26 November 2014.

Download references

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Criminal Justice Studies, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK

    Mark Button & Martin Tunley

Authors
  1. Mark Button
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Martin Tunley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark Button.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Button, M., Tunley, M. Explaining fraud deviancy attenuation in the United Kingdom. Crime Law Soc Change 63, 49–64 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-015-9551-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-015-9551-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation