Advertisement

Crime, Law and Social Change

, Volume 60, Issue 3, pp 319–341 | Cite as

Petty corruption in Central and Eastern Europe: the client’s perspective

  • David Jancsics
Article

Abstract

This qualitative study examines the role of clients in petty corruption by analyzing actual corrupt exchanges between ordinary citizens and low level public and private employees in post-communist Hungary. Using a grounded theory approach, interviews reveal how clients from different social strata deal with low-level agents in corrupt situations. Findings suggest two contrasting forms of low-level corruption: transactions where the client and the agent do not have a prior relationship and where external factors dominate the relationship; and cases with stronger social ties between the actors, where the client has more freedom to structure the transaction. However, a client's social background frequently determines the form of corrupt transaction and the form of resources illegally exchanged in the deal.

Keywords

Social Distance Prior Relationship Ordinary Citizen Corrupt Actor Corrupt Transaction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Rose-Ackerman, S. (1999). Corruption and government: causes, consequences, and reform. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hellman, J., & Kaufmann, D. (2001). Confronting the Challenge of State Capture in Transition Economies. Finance & Development, 38(3).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Theobald, R. (2008). Polishing up the steel frame: will more bureaucracy help contain the problem of petty corruption in Sub-Saharan Africa? Commonwealth & Comparative Politics, 46(2), 157–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kotchegura, A. (2004). Reducing corruption in post-communist countries. International Public Management Review, 5(1), 137–156.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Holmes, L. (1997). Corruption and the crisis of the post-communist state. Crime, Law & Social Change, 27(3–4), 275–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Miller, W. L., Grodeland, A. B., & Koshechkina, T. Y. (2001). A culture of corruption: coping with government in post-communist Europe. New York: CEU.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Karklins, R. (2005). The system made me do It: Corruption in post-communist societies. Armonk: Sharpe.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sajó, A. (2002). Clientelism and extortion: Corruption in transformation. In S. Kotkin & A. Sajó (Eds.), Political corruption in transition: A sceptic's handbook (pp. 1–23). New York: Central European University Press.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lambert-Mogiliansky, A., Majumdar, M., & Radner, R. (2007). Strategic analysis of petty corruption: entrepreneurs and bureaucrats. Journal of Development Economics, 83(2), 351–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Han Yoo, S. (2008). Petty corruption. Economic Theory, 37(2), 267–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kingston, C. (2007). Parochial corruption. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 63(1), 73–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Banfield, E. C. (1975). Corruption as a feature of governmental organization. Journal of Law and Economics, 18(3), 587–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1993). Corruption. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 599–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rose-Ackerman, S. (2006). Introduction and overview. In S. Rose-Ackerman (Ed.), International handbook on the economics of corruption (pp. xiv–xxxvii). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rothstein, B. (2011). The quality of government: Corruption, social trust, and inequality in international perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Szwajkowski, E. (1985). Organizational illegality: theoretical integration and illustrative application. The Academy of Management Review, 10(3), 558–567.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Baucus, M. S. (1994). Pressure, opportunity and predisposition: a multivariate model of corporate illegalit. Journal of Management, 20(4), 699–721.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ashforth, B. E., & Anand, V. (2003). The normalization of corruption in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 1–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Brief, A. P., Buttram, R. T., & Dukerich, J. M. (2001). Collective corruption in the corporate world: toward a process model. Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ashforth, B. E., Gioia, D. A., Robinson, S. L., & Trevino, L. K. (2008). Re-viewing organizational corruption. Academy of Management Review, 33(3), 670–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Needleman, M., & Needleman, C. (1979). Organizational crime: two models of criminogenesis. The Sociological Quarterly, 20, 517–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ditton, J. (1977). Learning to “fiddle” customers: an essay on the organised production of part-time theft. Work and Occupations, 4(4), 427–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ditton, J. (1977). Perks, pilferage, and the fiddle: the historical structure of invisible wages. Theory and Society, 4(1), 39–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Katz, J. (1977). Cover-up and collective integrity: on the natural antagonisms of authority internal and external to organizations. Social Problems, 25(1), 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Katz, J. (1979). Concerted ignorance: “the social construction of cover-up”. Urban Life, 8(3), 295–316.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Vaughan, D. (1996). The challenger launch decision: Risky technology, culture, and deviance at NASA. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Offe, C. (2004). Political corruption: Conceptual and practical issues. In J. Kornai & S. Rose-Ackerman (Eds.), Building a trustworthy state in post-socialist transition (pp. 77–100). New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mars, G. (1982). Cheats at work. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lomnitz, L. A. (1982). Horizontal and vertical relations and the social structure of urban Mexico. Latin American Research Review, 17(2), 51–74.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lomnitz, L. A. (1988). Informal exchange networks in formal systems: a theoretical model. American Anthropologist, 90(1), 42–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lomnitz, L. A., & Sheinbaum, D. (2004). Trust, social networks and the informal economy: a comparative analysis. Review of Sociology, 10(1), 2–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rivkin-Fish, D. (2005). Bribes, gifts and unofficial payments: Rethinking corruption in Post-Soviet Russian health care. London: Pluto.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Boissevain, J. (1989). Patronage in Sicily. In A. J. Heidenheimer, M. Johnston, & V. T. LeVine (Eds.), Political corruption: A handbook. New Brunswick: Transaction.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Campbell, J. K. (1989). Village friendship and patronage. In A. J. Heidenheimer, M. Johnston, & V. T. LeVine (Eds.), Political corruption: A handbook. New Burnswick: Transaction.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ledeneva, A. V. (1998). Russia’s Economy of favours: Blat, networking and informal exchange. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Humphrey, C. (2002). The unmaking of soviet life: Everyday economies after socialism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Bunker, S. N., & Cohen, L. E. (1983). Collaboration and competition in two colonization projects: toward a general theory of official corruption. Human Organization, 42(2), 106–114.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Graeff, P. (2004). Why should one trust in corruption. In J. G. Lambsdorff, M. Taube, & M. Schramm (Eds.), The new institutional economics (pp. 40–59). London: Routlege.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Fábrega, J. (2008). Petty Corruption and Social Networks. Paper presented at the Political Economy Workshop, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Granovetter, M. (2007). The social construction of corruption. In V. Nee & R. Swedberg (Eds.), On capitalism (pp. 152–172). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Mars, G., & Altman, Y. (1983). The cultural bases of Soviet Georgia's second economy. Soviet Studies, 35(4), 546–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Blau, P. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Schweitzer, H. (2004). Corruption – its spread and decline. In J. G. Lambsdorff, M. Taube, & M. Schramm (Eds.), The new institutional economics of corruption (pp. 16–40). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Wallace, C., & Latcheva, R. (2006). Economic transformation outside the law: corruption, trust in public institutions and the informal economy in transition countries of central and Eastern Europe. Europe-Asia Studies, 58(1), 81–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Báger, G., & Kovács, Á. (2005). Corruption and the options of the activities of the state audit office. Development and Finance, 3, 40–48.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Transparency International. 2012. Corruption Risks in Hungary: National Integrity System Country Study.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Mishra, A. (2006). Corruption, Hierarchies and Bureaucratic Structure. In S. Rose-Ackerman (Ed.), International Handbook on the Economics of Corruption (Vol. 189–216). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Allan, G. A. (1979). A sociology of friendship and kinship. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Sik, E., & Wellman, B. (1999). Network capital in capitalist, communist and post-communist countries. Oxford: Westview.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Böröcz, J. (2000). Informality rules East European. Politics and Societies, 14, 348–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Lambsdorff, J. G., Taube, M., & Schramm, M. (2004). Corrupt contracting: Exploring the analytical capacity of new institutional economics and new economic sociology. In J. G. Lambsdorff, M. Taube, & M. Schramm (Eds.), The new institutional economics of corruption (pp. 1–15). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Lambsdorff, J. G., & Teksoz, S. U. (2004). Corrupt relational contracting. In J. G. Lambsdorff, M. Taube, & M. Schramm (Eds.), The new institutional economics of corruption (pp. 138–152). New York: Routlege.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Lambsdorff, J. G. (2002). Making corrupt deals - contracting in the shadow of the law. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 48(3), 221–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    De Graaf, G., & Huberts, L. W. J. C. L. (2008). Portraying the nature of corruption using an explorative case study design. Public Administration Review, 68(4), 640–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Bourdieu, P. (1997). Marginalia - some additional notes of the gift. In A. D. Schrift (Ed.), The logic of the gift (pp. 231–241). New York: Routlege.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Graduate CenterCity University of New YorkNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations