Advertisement

Crime, Law and Social Change

, Volume 59, Issue 3, pp 305–318 | Cite as

Privatising the green police: the role of NGOs in wildlife law enforcement

  • Angus Nurse
Article

Abstract

This article examines the role of NGOs in wildlife law enforcement, drawing on empirical research conducted within UK environmental law enforcement but also drawing on a review of the academic literature and policy debates concerning NGOs and pressure group activity. It examines the theoretical basis for NGO actions and different policy perspectives, the ideologies employed by NGO's and how these manifest themselves in law enforcement policies and practice. While the focus of this essay is UK and US NGO activity with its professional enforcement activity and policy networks, the impact of wildlife and environmental NGOs is significant in a range of jurisdictions and is a vital component in effective policing of wildlife legislation.

Keywords

Wildlife law Law enforcement NGO Green crime Policing 

References

  1. 1.
    Schaffner, J. (2011). An introduction to animals and the law. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Benton, T. (1998). Rights and justice on a shared planet: more rights or new relations? Theoretical Criminology, 2(2), 149–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zimmerman, M. E. (2003). The black market for wildlife: combating transnational organized crime in the illegal wildlife trade. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 36, 1657–1689.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Akella, A. S., & Cannon, J. B. (2009). Strengthening the weakest links: strategies for improving the enforcement of environmental laws globally. Washington, DC: Center for Conservation and Government. In R. White (Ed.), Environmental crime; A reader (pp. 528–567). Cullompton: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kwasniak, A. (2006). Enforcing wildlife law: Canadian wildlife law project: paper 2. Calgary: University of Calgary.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kirkwood, G. (1994). The enforcement of wildlife protection legislation: a study of the police wildlife liaison officers’ network. Leicester: De Montfort University.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    White, R. (2012). NGO engagement in environmental law enforcement: critical reflections. Australasian Policing, 4(2), 7–12.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nurse, A. (2003) The nature of wildlife and conservation crime in the UK and its public response. Working Paper No 9. Birmingham: University of Central England Birmingham, Faculty of Law and Social Sciences.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Roeschke, J. E. (2009). Eco-terrorism and piracy on the high seas: Japanese whaling and the rights of private groups to enforce international conservation law in neutral waters. The Villanova Environmental Law Journal, XX(1), 99–136.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    The Cabinet Office (2011) Red tape challenge. London: Cabinet Office. Available at: http://www.redtapechallenge.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/home/index [accessed 29 June 2011].
  11. 11.
    US House of Representatives (2012). Report on the Department of the Interior, Environment and Related Agencies Appropriation Bill 2013. Available Online at: http://appropriations.house.gov/uploadedfiles/hrpt-112-ap-fy13-interior.pdf [Accessed 23 September 2012]. See also, Wasson, E. (2012) House Appropriators Advance Bill Slashing EPA Funding, The Hill Blog 20 June 2012. Washington: Capital Hill Publishing. Available Online at: http://thehill.com/blogs/on-the-money/appropriations/233839-house-appropriators-advance-bill-slashing-epa-funding [Accessed 20 September 2012].
  12. 12.
    Holden, J. (1998). By Hook or by Crook: a reference manual on illegal wildlife trade and prosecutions in the United Kingdom. Sandy: RSPB/TRAFFIC/WWF.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Roberts, M., Cook, D., Jones, P., & Lowther, D. (2001). Wildlife crime in the UK: towards a national crime unit. Wolverhampton: Department for the Environment, Food & Rural Affairs/Centre for Applied Social Research (University of Wolverhampton).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lowther, J., Cook, D., & Roberts, M. (2002). Crime and punishment in the wildlife trade. Wolverhampton: WWF/TRAFFIC/Regional Research Institute (University of Wolverhampton).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    National Wildlife Federation (2012). Endangered species act. Merryfield, VA: National Wildlife Federation. Available Online at - http://www.nwf.org/Wildlife/Wildlife-Conservation/Understanding-Wildlife-Conservation/Endangered-Species-Act.aspx [Accessed 20 September 2012].
  16. 16.
    Ando, A. W. (1999). Waiting to Be protected under the endangered species act: the political economy of regulatory delay. Journal of Law and Economics, 42(1), 29–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rios, J. M. (2011). National survey of environmental justice groups: what do they look like (organizational structure)? What Do they Do (tactics)? Some implications. Environmental Justice, 4(2), 115–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nurse, A. (2009). Dealing with animal offenders. In A. Linzey (Ed.), The link between animal abuse and human violence. Brighton: Sussex Academic Press.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Beirne, P., & South, N. (Eds.). (2007). Issues in green criminology: confronting harms against environments, humanity and other animals. Devon: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Radford, M. (2001). Animal welfare law in Britain: regulation and responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Skidelski, R. (2003) ‘If labour bans foxhunting, civil disobedience would be justified’. The Daily Telegraph, 8 October (online) Available at: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/personal-view/3597358/If-Labour-bans-foxhunting-civil-disobedience-would-be-justified.html [Accessed 08 August 2012].
  22. 22.
    Prado, I., & Prato, G. (2005). The Fox-hunting debate in the United Kingdom: a puritan legacy? Human Ecology Review, 12(1), 2005.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lowe, B. M. and Ginsberg, C. F. (2002). ‘Animal rights as a post-citizenship movement’ Society & Animals Vol. 10, No.2, Washington: Society & Animals Forum Inc.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Parkin, F. (1968). Middle class radicalism: the social bases of the British campaign for nuclear disarmament. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (2010). The RSPB Annual Review 2009–2010, Sandy: RSPB (online) Available at: http://www.rspb.org.uk/Images/Annual_review_tcm9-261508.pdf [Accessed 23 September 2012].
  26. 26.
    Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (2007) Annual Review 2006. Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty of Animals, Horsham: RSPCA.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    The Cruel Treatment of Cattle Act 1822.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kean, H. (1998). Animal rights: political and social change in Britain since 1800. London: Reaktion Books.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Jasper, J. M. (1997). The art of moral protest: culture, biography, and creativity in social movements. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Nurse, A. (2011). Policing wildlife: perspectives on criminality in wildlife crime. Papers from the British Criminology Conference, 11(2011), 38–53.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Briggs, H. (2012). Court battle on badger cull fails, BBC News Online. Available at: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-19563661 [Accessed 23 September 2012].
  32. 32.
  33. 33.
    Defenders of Wildlife. (2012). War on wolves: campaign to save wyoming’s wolves. Washington: Defenders of Wildlife.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    WWF. (2007). Wildlife Souvenirs: what you should look out for when buying souvenirs. Godalming: WWF/TRAFFIC.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Marsh, D., & Rhodes, R. A. W. (1992). Policy networks in British Government. Oxford: Clarenden Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Oxford Centre for Animal Ethics (2007). International conference on the relationship between animal abuse and human violence: conference programme. Oxford: University of Oxford. Available Online at - http://www.oxfordanimalethics.com/what-we-do/teaching/international-conference-on-the-relationship-between-animal-abuse-and-human-violence-2/ [Accessed 23 September 2012].
  37. 37.
    Beirne, P. (1999). For a nonspeciesist criminology: animal abuse as an object of study. Criminology, 37(1), 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    South, N. (1998). A green field for criminology? A proposal for a perspective. Theoretical Criminology, 2(2), 211–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Rollin, B. E. (2006). Animal rights and human morality. New York: Prometheus.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Linzey, A. (Ed.). (2009). The link between animal abuse and human violence. Eastbourne: Sussex Academic Press.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Linzey, A. (2009). Why animal suffering matters. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Baker, P., Harris, S., & White, P. (2006). After the hunt: the future for foxes in Britain. London: International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW).Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    League Against Cruel Sport (2012). Hunts and artificial earths: a league against cruel sports investigation. [online] Available at: http://www.league.org.uk/earths.
  44. 44.
    Countryside Alliance (2012). The case for hunting. [online] Countryside Alliance. Available at:http://www.countryside-alliance.org.uk/ca/file/CASE_FOR_HUNTING2012.pdf.
  45. 45.
    Thomas, J. W. (2003) Just what is fair chase? A University Class Ponders the Old Question Anew - Part 1, Fair Chase Winter 2002, pp. 12–13. Available Online at: http://www.huntfairchase.com/docs/7260b233.pdf [Accessed 24 September 2012].
  46. 46.
    Rochlitz, I. and Broom, D. M. (2008) An update of ‘The review on the welfare of deer, foxes, mink and hares subjected to hunting by humans’. London: International Fund for Animal Welfare. [online] Available at: http://www.ifaw.org/assets/General/NoReturnToCruelty/asset_upload_file667_61080.pdf.
  47. 47.
    Wise, S. M. (2000). Rattling the Cage. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Ascione, F. R. (Ed.). (2010). The international handbook of animal abuse and cruelty: theory, research, and application (New directions in the human-animal bond). Indiana: Purdue University Press.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Burns, L., Edwards, V., Marsh, J., Soulsby, L., & Winter, M. (2000). Committee of inquiry into hunting with dogs in England and Wales. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Ankers, N. K. (1993). Policing and environmentalism: a descriptive analysis of the influence of increased public concern for the environment upon the United Kingdom Police Service, focusing upon the role and development of Police Wildlife Liaison Officers. Manchester: University of Manchester.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Kirkwood, G. (1994). The enforcement of wildlife protection legislation: a study of the police wildlife liaison officers’ network. Leicester: De Montfort University.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Reiner, R. (2000). The politics of the police. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Muhammad, B. (2002). Rural crime and rural policing practices (multicultural law enforcement). Detroit: Detroit Police Department.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Lockwood, R. (1997). Deadly serious: An FBI perspective on animal cruelty. Washington: The Humane Society of the United States.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    White. (2008). Crimes against nature: environmental criminology and ecological justice. Cullompton: Willan.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Damania, R., Seidensticker, J., Whitten, A., Sethi, G., Mackinnon, K., Kiss, A., & Kushlin, A. (2008). A future for wild tigers. Washington: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank and Smithsonian’s National Zoological Park.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Saunders, T. (2001). Baiting the trap: one man’s secret battle to save our wildlife. London: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Bentham, J. (1789, 1970). Introduction to the principles of morals and legislation, Edited by Burns, J.H. and Hart, H.L.A, University of London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Singer, P. (1975). Animal liberation. New York: Avon.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Social SciencesBirmingham City UniversityPerry BarrUK

Personalised recommendations