Advertisement

Crime, Law and Social Change

, Volume 55, Issue 5, pp 469–482 | Cite as

Criminalizing protests about animal abuse. Recent Irish experience in global context

  • Roger Yates
Article

Abstract

Supporters of the Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act (2006) label as “terrorists” mainstream animal welfare corporations such as the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) and People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PeTA). Animal advocates fear that conventional forms of protest, such as boycotts and street demonstrations, are being redefined within such legislation as potential “acts of terror”. Meanwhile, in Ireland, peaceful grassroots animal rights campaigners have begun to be arrested and jailed for standing outside fur shops with an information table. Is Ireland next in line in terms of the apparent global criminalisation of animal advocacy?

Keywords

Irish Society Grassroots Organisation Animal Abuse Irish People Irish Dairy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Atlapedia Online. (n.d.). http://www.atlapedia.com/online/countries/ireland.htm Accessed 10 January, 2011.
  2. 2.
    Irish Co-Op Organisation Society. (2003). http://www.icos.ie/uploads/documents/upload/Chapter1.pdf Accessed 12 December, 2010.
  3. 3.
    The Age. (2004). http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2004/10/29/1098992287581.html Accessed 6 January 2011.
  4. 4.
    Association of Chief Police Officers of England, Wales and Northern Ireland. (2005–2007). http://www.acpo.police.uk/NCDE/AboutNCDE.aspx Accessed 15 December 2010.
  5. 5.
    Association of Chief Police Officers of England, Wales and Northern Ireland. (2005–2007). http://www.acpo.police.uk/ncde/ Accessed 15 December 2010.
  6. 6.
    NETCU WATCH. (n.d.). http://netcu.wordpress.com/ Accessed 15 December 2010.
  7. 7.
    Fitwatch. Resisting and Monitoring Forward Intelligence Policing. (n.d.). http://www.fitwatch.org.uk/ Accessed 16 December 2010.
  8. 8.
    SHACWATCH. (n.d.). http://shacwatch.blogspot.com/ Accessed 16 December 2010.
  9. 9.
    Wallace, M. (2010). http://www.crashbangwallace.com/tag/sarah-whitehead/ Accessed 16 December 2010.
  10. 10.
    SOURCEWATCH. (n.d.). http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Eco-terrorism Accessed 17 December 2010.
  11. 11.
    OSCN. The Oklahoma State Courts Network. 2 O.S. § 5-105 (OSCN 2011), Oklahoma Farm Animal, Crop, and Research Facilities Protection Act. (2003). http://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/DeliverDocument.asp?CiteID=436023 Accessed 19 December 2010.
  12. 12.
    Robbins, J. (2010). Are so-called “eco-terrorists” falsely prosecuted. The Huffington Post, Sept 16. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/john-robbins/what-is-the-difference-be_1_b_720012.html Accessed 19 December 2010.
  13. 13.
    Case 2:06-cr-00035-MCE Document 316. United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. (2008). http://www.supporteric.org/declaration2.pdf Accessed 20 December 2010.
  14. 14.
    Office of the Attorney General. Irish Statute Book. Offences Against the State Act, (1939). http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/1939/en/act/pub/0013/print.html Accessed 22 December 2010.
  15. 15.
    Parsons, M. (2010). Protestors march over proposed ban on stag hunting and fur farming. Irish Times. 29 March. http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/ireland/2010/0329/1224267278752.html Accessed 7 December 2010.
  16. 16.
    Office of the Attorney General. Irish Statute Book. Criminal Justice (Public Order) Act, (1994). http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/1994/en/act/pub/0002/index.html Accessed 22 December 2010.
  17. 17.
    Best, S. (2009). 13 ways to promote alliance politics and total liberation. INDYMEDIA UK. https://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2009/11/442459.html Accessed 10 January 2011.
  18. 18.
    Arnold, R. (1997). Eco terror: The violent agenda to save nature: The world of the unibomber. Bellevue, Wash: Free Enterprise Press.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bartlett, T. (2010). Ireland: A history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Beirne, P. (2007). Animal rights, animal abuse and green criminology. In P. Beirne & N. South (Eds.), Issues in green criminology: Confronting harms against environments, humanity and other animals (pp. 55–83). Cullompton, Devon: Willan.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Beirne, P. (2009). Confronting animal abuse: Law, criminology, and human-animal relations. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Berg, B. L. (2007). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. London: Pearson.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Best, S., & Nocella, A. J., II (2004). (eds.) Terrorists or freedom fighters?: Reflections on the liberation of animals. New York: Lantern.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Best, S., & Nocella, A. J., II (2006). (eds.) Igniting a revolution: voices in defense of the earth. Oakland: AK.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gold, M. (1997). Animal century: A celebration of changing attitudes to animals. Charlbury, Ox: Carpenter.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Guither, H. D. (1998). Animal rights: History and scope of a radical social movement. Carbondale & Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hall, L. (2006). Capers in the churchyard: Animal rights advocacy in the age of terror. Darien, Conn: Nectar Bat.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Henshaw, D. (1989). Animal warfare: The story of the animal liberation front. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Herlihy, K. (1995). (ed.) The Irish dissenting tradition, 1650–1750. Dublin: Four Courts Press.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Jasper, J. M., & Nelkin, D. (1992). The animal rights crusade: The growth of a moral protest. New York: Free.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kelly, M. (2007). Environmental debates and the public in Ireland. Dublin: Institute of Public Administration.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lee, R. M. (1993). Doing research on sensitive topics. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mann, K. (2007). From dusk ‘til dawn: An insider’s view of the growth of the animal liberation movement. London: Puppy Pincher.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Matthews, B., & Ross, L. (2010). Research methods: A practical guide for the social sciences. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    May, T. (1993). Social research: issue, methods and process. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Morrison, D. (2006). (ed.) Hunger strike: reflections on the 1981 republican hunger strike. Dindle, Co. Kerry: Brandon—Mount Eagle.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Mulcahy, A. (2007). Crime, policing and social control. In S. O’Sullivan (Ed.), Contemporary Ireland: A sociological map (pp. 120–135). Dublin: University College Dublin Press.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Regan, T. (2004). Empty cages: Facing the challenge of animal rights. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ryder, R. (2000). Animal revolution: Changing attitudes towards speciesism. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Smith, M. L. R. (1997). Fighting for Ireland? The military strategy of the Irish republican movement. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Solnit, R. (1998). Book of migrations: Some passages in Ireland. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Sorenson, J. (2009). Constructing terrorists: Propaganda about animal rights. Critical Studies on Terrorism, 2(2), 237–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Stallwood, K. (2004). A personal view of direct cction. In S. Best & A. J. Nocella (Eds.), Terrorists or freedom fighters? Reflections on the liberation of animals (pp. 81–90). New York: Lantern.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Tovey, H. (2007). Environmentalism in Ireland: Movement and activists. Dublin: Institute of Public Administration.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Tovey, H. (2007). Food and rural sustainable development. In S. O’Sullivan (Ed.), Contemporary Ireland: A sociological map (pp. 283–298). Dublin: University College Dublin Press.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Tovey, H., & Share, P. (2003). A sociology of Ireland (2nd ed.). Dublin: Gill & Macmillan.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Volcansek, M. I., & Stack, J. F. (2010). (eds.) Courts and terrorism: nine nations balance rights and security. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Webb, R. (2004). Animal liberation—by ‘any means necessary’. In S. Best & A. J. Nocella II (Eds.), Terrorists or freedom fighters?: Reflections on the liberation of animals (pp. 75–80). New York: Lantern.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University College DublinDublinIreland

Personalised recommendations