Crime, Law and Social Change

, Volume 54, Issue 2, pp 159–170 | Cite as

Friedman economic policies, social exclusion, and crime: toward a gendered left realist subcultural theory

  • Walter S. DeKeseredy
  • Martin D. Schwartz


Left realists contend that people lacking legitimate means of solving the problem of relative deprivation may come into contact with other frustrated disenfranchised people and form subcultures, which in turn, encourage criminal behaviors. Absent from this theory is an attempt to address how, today, subcultural development in North America and elsewhere is heavily shaped simultaneously by the recent destructive consequences of right-wing Friedman or Chicago School economic policies and marginalized men’s attempts to live up to the principles of hegemonic masculinity. The purpose of this paper, then, is to offer a new left realist theory that emphasizes the contribution of these two key determinants.


Public Housing Relative Deprivation Woman Abuse Progressive Scholar Hegemonic Masculinity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Ageton, S. (1983). Sexual assault among adolescents. Lexington: D.C. Heath.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Akers, R. L. (1997). Criminological theories: Introduction and evaluation (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: Roxbury.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alvi, S., DeKeseredy, W. S., & Ellis, D. (2000). Contemporary social problems in North American society. Toronto: Addison Wesley Longman.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barak, G. (2009). Criminology: An integrated approach. Lanham: Roman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barak, G., Leighton, P., & Flavin, J. (2007). Class, race, gender, & crime: The social realities of justice in America. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Basran, G. S., Gill, C., & MacLean, B. D. (1995). Farmworkers and their children. Vancouver: Collective.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bourgois, P. (1995). In search of respect: Selling Crack in El Barrio. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bowker, L. (1983). Beating wife beating. Lexington: Lexington.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2009). Summer youth labor force release. Washington: U.S. Department of Labor.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Campbell, H. (2000). The glass phallus: Pub(lic) masculinity and drinking in rural New Zealand. Rural Sociology, 65, 562–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cohen, A. (1955). Delinquent boys: The culture of the gang. New York: Free.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cohen, L., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activities approach. American Sociological Review, 44, 588–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Conway, J. F. (2001). The Canadian family in crisis (4th ed.). Toronto: Lorimer.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Currie, E. (2007). Against marginality: Arguments for a public criminology. Theoretical Criminology, 11, 175–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Currie, E. (2008). The roots of danger: Violent crime in global perspective. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    DeKeseredy, W. S. (1990). Male peer support and woman abuse: The current stake of knowledge. Sociological Focus, 23, 129–139.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    DeKeseredy, W. S. (2010). Contemporary critical criminology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    DeKeseredy, W. S., Alvi, S., & Schwartz, M. D. (2006). Left realism revisited. In W. S. DeKeseredy & B. Perry (Eds.), Advancing critical criminology: Theory and application (pp. 19–42). Lanham: Lexington.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    DeKeseredy, W. S., Alvi, S., & Schwartz, M. D. (2006). An economic exclusion/male peer support model looks at “wedfare” and woman abuse. Critical Criminology, 14, 23–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    DeKeseredy, W. S., Alvi, S., Schwartz, M. D., & Perry, B. (1999). Violence against and the harassment of women in Canadian public housing. The Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 36, 499–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    DeKeseredy, W. S., Alvi, S., Schwartz, M. D., & Tomaszewski, E. A. (2003). Under siege: Poverty and crime in a public housing community. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    DeKeseredy, W. S., & Dragiewicz, M. (2007). Understanding the complexities of feminist perspectives on woman abuse: A commentary on Donald G. Dutton’s Rethinking Domestic Violence. Violence Against Women, 13, 874–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    DeKeseredy, W. S., & Schwartz, M. D. (1991). British left realism on the abuse of women: A critical appraisal. In R. Quinney & H. Pepinsky (Eds.), Criminology as peacemaking (pp. 154–171). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    DeKeseredy, W. S., & Schwartz, M. D. (1998). Woman abuse on campus: Results from the Canadian national survey. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    DeKeseredy, W. S., & Schwartz, M. D. (2002). Theorizing public housing woman abuse as a function of economic exclusion and male peer support. Women’s Health and Urban Life, 1, 26–45.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    DeKeseredy, W. S., & Schwartz, M. D. (2005). Left realist theory. In S. Henry & M. Lanier (Eds.), The essential criminology reader (pp. 307–316). Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    DeKeseredy, W. S., & Schwartz, M. D. (2005). Masculinities and interpersonal violence. In M. S. Kimmel, J. Hearn, & R. W. Connell (Eds.), Handbook of studies on men & masculinities (pp. 353–366). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    DeKeseredy, W. S., & Schwartz, M. D. (2009). Dangerous exits: Escaping abusive relationships in rural America. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Dobash, R. E., & Dobash, R. (1979). Violence against wives: A case against the patriarchy. New York: Free.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Dragiewicz, M. (2009). Why sex and gender mater in domestic violence research and advocacy. In E. Stark & E. S. Buzawa (Eds.), Violence against women in families and relationships, volume 3 (pp. 201–216). Santa Barbara: Praeger.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Durkheim, E. (1951/1897). Suicide. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ellis, D., & DeKeseredy, W. S. (1996). The wrong stuff: An introduction to the sociological study of deviance (2nd ed.). Toronto: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Fenwick, S. (2009). Business focused fix for SSHRC. The Gateway, March 9, 1Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Galt, V. (2009). Youth bear brunt of job losses: Canada’s student unemployment rate hits almost 21 percent in July, the highest on record. Globe and Mail, August 7, 1Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Garrett-Gooding, J., & Senter, R. (1987). Attitudes and acts of sexual aggression on a university campus. Sociological Inquiry, 57, 349–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Gibbons, D. (1994). Talking about crime and criminals: Problems and issues in theory development in criminology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Godenzi, A., Schwartz, M. D., & DeKeseredy, W. S. (2001). Toward a gendered social bond/male peer support theory of university woman abuse. Critical Criminology, 10, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Gumus, G. (2006). Alcohol consumption and unemployment. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Economics of Population Health: Inaugural Conference of the American Society of Health Economists, TBA, Madison, WI, USA, June 4.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Hagedorn, J. M. (1988). People and folks: Gangs, crime and the underclass in a rustbelt city. Chicago: Lakeview.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Henry, S. (1999). Is left realism a useful theory for addressing the problems of crime?: No. In J. R. Fuller & E. W. Hickey (Eds.), Controversial issues in criminology (pp. 137–144). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Hiller, H. H. (2010). Urban Canada. Toronto: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    James, R. (2009). A city of disparities. Toronto Star, October 6, R1, R7.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Jones, T., MacLean, B. D., & Young, J. (1986). The Islington Crime Survey. London: Gower.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Kimmel, M. S. (2000). The gendered society. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Klein, M. W. (2007). Chasing after street gangs: A forty-year journey. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Klein, N. (2007). The shock doctrine: The rise of disaster capitalism. Toronto: Knopf.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Krug, E. G., Dahlberg, L. L., Mercy, J. A., Zwi, A. B., & Lozano, R. (2002). World report on violence and health. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Lea, J., & Young, J. (1984). What is to be done about law and order? New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Levant, R. (1994). Male violence against female partners: Roots in male socialization and development. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the American Psychological Association, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science; selected theoretical papers. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Massey, D.R. (2007). Categorically unequal: The American stratification system. New York: Russell Sage FoundationGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Massey, D. R. (2007). Categorically unequal: The American stratification system. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Matthews, R. (2009). Beyond “so what?” criminology. Theoretical Criminology, 13, 341–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Messerschmidt, J. W. (1993). Masculinities and crime: Critique and reconceptualization. Lanham: Roman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Messerschmidt, J. W. (2005). Men, masculinities, and crime. In M. S. Kimmel, J. Hearn, & R. W. Connell (Eds.), Handbook of studies on men & masculinities (pp. 196–212). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Messner, S. F., Krohn, M. D., & Liska, A. E. (1990). Theoretical integration in the study of deviance and crime. Albany: SUNY.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Miller, J. (2008). Getting played: African American girls, urban inequality, and gendered violence. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Pearce, F. (1989). The radical Durkheim. Boston: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Porter, T. (2006). Becoming part of the solution. Charlotte, N.C.: A Call to Men: National Association of Men and Women Committed to Ending Violence Against Women.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Raphael, J. (2001). Public housing and domestic violence. Violence Against Women, 7, 699–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Sartre, J. P. (1964). The words. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Savelsberg, J. J., King, R., & Cleveland, L. (2002). Politicized scholarship: Science on crime and the state. Social Problems, 49, 327–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Schur, E. M. (1984). Labeling women deviant: Gender, stigma, and social control. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Schmalleger, F., & Volk, R. (2005). Canadian criminology today: Theories and applications (2nd ed.). Toronto: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Schwalbe, M. (2008). Rigging the game: How inequality is reproduced in everyday life. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Schwartz, M. D., & DeKeseredy, W. S. (1997). Sexual assault on the college campus: The role of male peer support. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Schwartz, M. D., DeKeseredy, W. S., Tait, D., & Alvi, S. (2001). Male peer support and routine activities theory: Understanding sexual assault on the college campus. Justice Quarterly, 18, 701–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Schwendinger, J., & Schwendinger, H. (1983). Rape and inequality. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Service Canada. (2009). Employment insurance (EI). Online. Available: (accessed 30 September 2009).
  73. 73.
    Sinclair, R. L. (2002). Male peer support and male-to-female dating abuse committed by socially displaced male youth: An exploratory study. Carleton University: Unpublished doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Smith, M. D. (1990). Patriarchal ideology and wife beating: A test of a feminist hypothesis. Violence and Victims, 5, 257–273.Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Taylor, I., Walton, P., & Young, J. (1973). The new criminology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Thomas, J., & O’Maolchatha, A. (1989). Reassessing the critical metaphor: An opportunistic revisionist view. Justice Quarterly, 2, 143–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2000). Extent, nature, and consequences of intimate partner violence: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Washington: U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Toronto Community Foundation. (2009). Toronto’s vital signs. Toronto: Author.Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Wacquant, L. (2008). Urban outcasts: A comparative sociology of advanced marginality. Malden: Polity.Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Walters, R. (2003). New modes of governance and the commodification of criminological knowledge. Social and legal studies, 12, 5–26.Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Warr, M. (2002). Companions in crime: The social aspects of criminal conduct. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    West, C. (2001). Race matters. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Whittington, L. (2009a). Easing rules for EI ‘irresponsible’: Liberal proposal to let more jobless quality would be ineffective and too expensive, Finley charges. Toronto Star, September 10, A6Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Whittington, L. (2009b). Harper got it all wrong, budget watchdog says. Toronto Star, July 7, A1Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Williams, D. R., Haile, R., Gonzalex, H. M., Neighbors, H., Baser, R., & Jackson, J. S. (2007). The mental health of black Caribbean immigrants: results from the national survey of American life. American Journal of Public Health, 97, 52–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Willis, P. (1977). Learning to labor: How working class kids get working class jobs. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Wilson, W. J. (1996). When work disappears: The world of the new urban poor. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Wilson, W. J., & Taub, R. P. (2006). There goes the neighborhood: Racial, ethnic, and class tensions in four Chicago neighborhoods and their meaning for America. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Yar, M., & Penna, S. (2004). Between positivism and post-modernity?: Critical reflections on Jock Young’s The exclusive society. British Journal of Criminology, 44, 533–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Young, J. (1992). Ten points of realism. In J. Young & R. Matthews (Eds.), Rethinking criminology: The realist debate (pp. 24–68). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Young, J. (1999). The exclusive society. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Criminology, Justice and Policy StudiesUniversity of Ontario Institute of TechnologyOshawaCanada
  2. 2.Department of SociologyOhio UniversityAthensUSA

Personalised recommendations