Advertisement

Crime, Law and Social Change

, Volume 52, Issue 2, pp 159–179 | Cite as

A comparative study of the attitudes of Urban, Suburban and Rural Police Officers in New Jersey regarding the use of force

  • Kevin J. Barrett
  • Maria (Maki) Haberfeld
  • Michael C. Walker
Article

Abstract

This article examines the attitudes of sample populations of urban, suburban and rural police officers in New Jersey in regard to a hypothetical use of force scenario. The aim of the study is to identify similarities and differences in the perceptions of officers who are faced with the same type of hypothetical situations but who are exposed to different training, procedural and environmental factors. Police officers in the United States receive different types of training in each state that might influence their attitudes towards the use of force. A pilot study was conducted comparing two urban police departments from two different states and showed some differences in the attitudes of the surveyed officers. To further explore these differences, a more refined look at three police departments in one state (New Jersey) was conducted as part of a doctoral dissertation of the lead author. Research questions are aimed at identifying the differences in the frameworks for the justification of force based on a host of variables. The research questions stipulated that there will be some significant differences in attitudes towards the use of force by the officers, based on physical location of the communities they police. The findings of the study identified additional factors that might influence the officers’ attitudes. Twelve focus groups, four at each of the sites, were analyzed and it appears that there may be a geographic and demographic influence on how the officers respond to the scenario.

Keywords

Focus Group Police Officer Police Department Verbal Abuse Civil Liability 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Alpert, G. P., & Smith, W. C. (1994). How reasonable is the reasonable man?: Police and excessive force. The Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 85(2), 481–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Attorney General’s use of force guidelines (http://www.state.nj.us/lps/dcj/agguide/useofforce2001.pdf.)
  3. 3.
    Bayley, D. H., & Garofalo, J. (1989). The management of violence by police patrol officers. Criminology, 27(1), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bazley, T. D., Lersch, K. M., & Mieczkowski, T. (2006, December). Police use of force: Detectives in an urban police department. Criminal Justice Review, 31(3), 213–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Binder, A., & Scharf, P. (1980). The violent police—citizen encounter. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 452, 111–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Birkbeck, C. (2001). Summary Report: International Meeting on Use of Force by the Police. Retrieved September 15, 2006 from http://www.policeuseofforce.org/pdf/Merida-eng-2001.pdf.
  7. 7.
    Birkbeck, C.,Abreu, S. R.,Adang, O.,Baker, D.,Feltes, T.,Gabaldón, L. G., et al. (2006). Justification frameworks for the police use of force. Unpublished report.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bittner, E. (1970). The functions of the police in modern society: A review of background factors, current practices and possible role models. 2nd ed. N.Y.: Jason Aronson (1975). First published in 1970. National Institute of Health.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Black, D. (1971). The social organization of arrest. Stanford Law Review, 35, 63–77.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fyfe, J. J. (1996). Training to reduce police-civilian violence. In W. Geller, & H. Toch (Eds.), Police violence: Understanding and controlling police abuse of force (pp. 165–179). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Graham v. Connor 490 U.S.386 (1989).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Grant, J. D., & Grant, J. (1996). Officer selection and the prevention of abuse of force. In W. Geller, & H. Toch (Eds.), Police violence: Understanding and controlling police abuse of force (pp. (pp. 150–164)). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Haberfeld, M. R. (2002). Critical issues in police training. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education Inc.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Klofas, J. M. (2000). Metropolitan development and policing: The elephant in the living room. Criminal Justice Review, 25(2), 234–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liederbach, J. (2005). Addressing the “Elephant in the living room”: An observational study of the work of suburban police. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 28(3), 415–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lundman, R. J. (1974). Routine police arrest practices: A common-weal perspective. Social Problems, 22, 127–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lundman, R. J. (1994). Demeanor or crime? The Midwest city police-citizen encounters study. Criminology, 32, 631–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    N.J. State Police Uniform Crime Reporting Unit http://www.njsp.org/info/ucr2005/index.html.
  19. 19.
    Paoline, E. A., & Terrill, W. (2007, February). Police education, experience, and the use of force. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34(2), 179–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd Ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Petrowski, T. D. (2002). Use-of-force polices and training: A reasoned approach. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 25–31.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Petrowski, T. D. (2002). Use-of-force policies and training: A reasoned approach (part two). FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 24–31.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Piliavin, I., & Briar, S. (1964). Police encounters with juveniles. American Journal of Sociology, 70, 206–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Reuss-Ianni, E. (1983). Two cultures of policing: Street cops and management cops. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Team of international researchers (http://www.policeuseofforce.org/.)
  26. 26.
    Terrill, W. (2003). Police use of force and suspect resistance: The micro process of the police-suspect encounter. Police Quarterly, 6(1), 51–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Toch, H. (1996). The violence—prone police officer. In W. Geller, & H. Toch (Eds.), Police violence: Understanding and controlling police abuse of force (pp. (pp. 94–112)). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
  29. 29.
    Walker, S. (1983). The police in america: An introduction. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Weisheit, R. A., Wells, L. E., & Falcone, D. N. (1995). Crime and policing in rural and small-town America: An overview of the issues. Retrieved March 7, 2006 from http://www.ncjrs.gov/txtfiles/crimepol.txt.
  31. 31.
    Wells, L. E., Falcone, D. N., & Rabe-Hemp, C. (2003). Community characteristics and policing styles in suburban agencies. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 26(4), 566–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Westley, W. (1953). Violence and the police. American Journal of Sociology, 59, 34–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wilson, J. Q. (1968). Varieties of police behavior: The management of law and order in eight communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Worden, R. E. (1996). The causes of police brutality: Theory and evidence on police use of force. In W. Geller, & H. Toch (Eds.),Police violence: Understanding and controlling police abuse of force (pp. 23–51). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kevin J. Barrett
    • 1
  • Maria (Maki) Haberfeld
    • 2
  • Michael C. Walker
    • 3
  1. 1.John Jay College of Criminal Justice (CUNY)Ridgefield ParkUSA
  2. 2.John Jay College of Criminal Justice (CUNY)New YorkUSA
  3. 3.Passaic County Community CollegePatersonUSA

Personalised recommendations