Advertisement

Crime, Law and Social Change

, Volume 51, Issue 3–4, pp 399–412 | Cite as

Power-seeking crime? The professional thief versus the professional launderer

  • Antoinette Verhage
  • Paul Ponsaers
Article

Abstract

Relating the concept of power to motives and objectives for criminal activities results in different images of criminals and their motivations. In this article, we aim to reflect on two different forms of crime (burglary versus money laundering) starting from a power perspective. We describe how the pursuit of power may or may not be related to crime, perpetrators and the policies that have been developed to prevent or repress these types of crime. By examining the motives behind both burglary and money laundering, we try to make clear how the concept of power and power pursuit leads to different rationales in criminal conduct. We try to determine to what extent ‘rational choice’ plays a role in this respect. As a conclusion, we argue that ‘power’ as such influences patterns of crime, victimisation and societal reactions (by means of criminal policy). The extent to which power accumulation is an outcome of crime, will in part determine the social reaction to crime and as a result, the perceived threat of crime.

Keywords

Criminal Activity Money Laundering Economic Power Power Motive Criminal Group 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    CTIF-CFI (2008). Annual Report 2007. Brussel.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    De Standaard (24 December 1999). DRIE. Jo Lernout & Pol Hauspie.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    De Standaard (22 July 2006). Verdachten Lernout & Hauspie riskeren vijf jaar cel.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    De Standaard (23 May 2007) 200 nieuwe burgerlijke partijen op tweede procesdag L&H.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    De Standaard (18 October 2007) Dexia en KPMG stellen zich burgerlijke partij in L&H proces.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    De Standaard (7 May 2008). Rijkste Belg wordt verdacht van witwassen.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dowding, K. (1996). Power (Concepts in Social Thought). University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Heiskala, R. (2001). “Theorizing power: Weber, Parsons, Foucault and neostructuralism”. Social Science Information, 40(2), 241–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hoogenboom, B. (2006). “Voorbij goed en kwaad van witwassen”. Justitiële Verkenningen, 32(2), 76–86.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    International Monetary Fund (2004). The IMF and the Fight against Money Laundering and the Financing of Terrorism. A Fact Sheet.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kennedy, A. (2005). “Dead Fish across the Trail: Illustrations of Money Laundering Methods”. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 8(4), 305–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kleemans, E., Brienen, M., et al. (2002). Georganiseerde criminaliteit in Nederland, Tweede rapportage op basis van de WODC-monitor. Den Haag: WODC.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kochan, N. (2006). The Washing Machine. Money, Crime and Terror in the Offshore System. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Levi, M. (1996). Money Laundering: Risks and Countermeasures. In A. Graycar, & P. Grabosky (Eds.), Money Laundering in the 21st century: risks and countermeasures. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Levi, M. & Reuter P. (2006). Money Laundering Chicago.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Masciandaro, D. (1999). “Money Laundering: the Economics of Regulation”. European Journal of Law and Economics, 3, 225–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Naylor, R. (2007). Criminal profits, terror dollars and nonsense. Tax Justice NL, Seminar on Money Laundering, Tax Evasion and Financial Regulation. Transnational Institute Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nelen, H. (2004). “Hit them where it hurts most? The proceeds-of-crime approach in the Netherlands”. Crime, Law and Social Change, 41(5), 517–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Passas, N., & Groskin, R. B. (2001). “Overseeing and overlooking: The US federal authorities’ response to money laundering and other misconduct at BCCI”. Crime, Law and Social Change, 35(1), 141–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ruggiero, V. (2007). ‘It’s the Economy, Stupid! Classifying Power Crime’. International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 35, 163–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Stessens, G. (2000). Money Laundering: A New International Law Enforcement Model. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Suendorf, U. (2001). Geldwäsche: eine kriminologische Untersuchung. Neuwied: Luchterhand.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    U.S. Department of State (1998). 1997 International Narcotics Control Strategy Report. Washington, DC, Released by the Bureau for International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Unger, B. (2006). The amounts and effects of money laundering. Report for the Ministry of Finance. Den Haag.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    van Duyne, P. (1997). Money Laundering. Pavlov’s dog and beyond. European Regional Fraud Conference. AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    van Duyne, P., & de Miranda, H. (1999). “The emperor’s clothes of disclosure: Hot money and suspect disclosures”. Crime, Law and Social Change, 31(3), 245–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Vande Walle, G. (2002). La salle de jeu des criminels en col blanc raffinés. Criminalité financière et économique en Belgique. In P. Ponsaers, & V. Ruggiero (Eds.), La Criminalité Economique et Financière en Europe (pp. 77–98). Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Verwee, I., Ponsaers, P., et al. (2007). Inbreken is mijn vak. Textuur en praktijk van woninginbraak. Den Haag: Boom Juridische uitgevers.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Williams, P. (1994). ‘Transnational Criminal Organisations and International Security’. Survival, 36(1), 96–113.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wright Mills, Ch. (1956). The Power Elite. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Group Social Analysis of Security (SVA)Ghent UniversityGhentBelgium

Personalised recommendations