Advertisement

Risk Terrain Modeling and Socio-Economic Stratification: Identifying Risky Places for Violent Crime Victimization in Bogotá, Colombia

  • Alejandro Giménez-Santana
  • Joel M. Caplan
  • Grant Drawve
Article

Abstract

This research focused on the effect of the built environment on Bogotá’s violent crime by using the Risk Terrain Modeling (RTM) technique. The current study used 17 ecological variables, including micro-level data on the spatial distribution of socio-economic strata, and the location of an array of businesses and other features of the landscape. As suggested by the results of this study, the spatial distribution of violent crime in Bogotá is highly correlated with the allocation of socio-economic strata throughout its geography. A statistically valid RTM analysis identified the micro-level risk factors associated with three types of violent crime incidents, namely homicide, assault, and theft incidents. These results suggest that future violent crime incidents are more likely to occur at a reduced number of high-risk micro-places. Moreover, while homicide and assault incidents were more likely to cluster within the poorest areas of the city, theft incidents presented a higher risk of victimization near the city center, where economic activity and suitable targets concentrate. This study offers a unique account regarding the effect of socio-economic segregation on violent crime victimization across Bogotá’s geography and within different socio-economic strata classifications.

Keywords

Risk terrain modeling Crime analysis Urban segregation 

References

  1. Agnew, R. (1999). A general strain theory of community differences in crime rates. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 36(2), 123–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beckett, K., & Godoy, A. (2010). A tale of two cities: A comparative analysis of quality of life initiatives in New York and Bogotá. Urban Studies, 47(2), 277–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beltrán, J. P. (2005). Bogotá región: crecimiento urbano en la consolidación del territorio metropolitano. JPB, Historia Ambiental de Bogota en el siglo XX. Bogotá.Google Scholar
  4. Bernasco, W., & Block, R. (2011). Robberies in Chicago: A block-level analysis of the influence of crime generators, crime attractors, and offender anchor points. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 48(1), 33–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bichler, G., Schmerler, K., & Enriquez, J. (2013). Curbing nuisance motels: An evaluation of police as place regulators. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 36(2), 437–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blau, J. R., & Blau, P. M. (1982). The cost of inequality: Metropolitan structure and violent crime. American Sociological Review, 114–129.Google Scholar
  7. Brantingham, P. J., & Brantingham, P. L. (2008). Crime pattern theory. In R. Wortley & L. Mazerolle (Eds.), Environmental criminology and crime analysis (pp. 78–93). Cullompton: Willan.Google Scholar
  8. Brantingham, P. L., & Brantingham, P. J. (1993). Nodes, paths and edges: Considerations on the complexity of crime and the physical environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13(1), 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brantingham, P. L., & Brantingham, P. J. (1995). Criminality of place. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 3(3), 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Caplan, J. M. (2011). Mapping the spatial influence of crime correlates: a comparison of operationalization schemes and implications for crime analysis and criminal justice practice. Cityscape, 13(3), 57–83.Google Scholar
  11. Caplan, J. M. & Kennedy, L. W. (2016). Risk Terrain Modeling: Crime Prediction and Risk Reduction. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California Press.Google Scholar
  12. Caplan, J. M., Kennedy, L. W., & Piza, E. L. (2013). Joint utility of event-dependent and environmental crime analysis techniques for violent crime forecasting. Crime and Delinquency, 59(2), 243–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Caplan, J. M., Kennedy, L. W., Barnum, J. D., & Piza, E. L. (2017). Crime in context: Utilizing risk terrain modeling and conjunctive analysis of case configurations to explore the dynamics of criminogenic behavior settings. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 33(2), 133–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chainey, S., Tompson, L., & Uhlig, S. (2008). The utility of hotspot mapping for predicting spatial patterns of crime. Security Journal, 21(1–2), 4–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 588–608.Google Scholar
  16. Cornish, D. B., & Clarke, R. V. (Eds.). (1986). The reasoning criminal: Rational choice perspectives on offending. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  17. Drawve, G. (2016). A metric comparison of predictive hot spot techniques and RTM. Justice Quarterly, 33(3), 369–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Drawve, G., & Barnum, J. D. (2017). Place-based risk factors for aggravated assault across police divisions in Little Rock, Arkansas. Journal of Crime and Justice, 1-20.Google Scholar
  19. Drawve, G., Belongie, M., & Steinman, H. (2017). The role of crime analyst and researcher partnerships: a training exercise in Green Bay, Wisconsin. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, pax092.  https://doi.org/10.1093/police/pax092
  20. Drawve, G., Moak, S. C., & Berthelot, E. R. (2016a). Predictability of gun crimes: A comparison of hot spot and risk terrain modelling techniques. Policing and Society, 26(3), 312–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Drawve, G., Thomas, S. A., & Walker, J. T. (2016b). Bringing the physical environment back into neighborhood research: The utility of RTM for developing an aggregate neighborhood risk of crime measure. Journal of Criminal Justice, 44, 21–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dugato, M. (2013). Assessing the validity of risk terrain modeling in a European city: Preventing robberies in the city of Milan. Crime Mapping, 5(1), 63–89.Google Scholar
  23. Dugato, M., Calderoni, F., & Berlusconi, G. (2017). Forecasting organized crime homicides: risk terrain modeling of Camorra violence in Naples, Italy. Journal of Interpersonal Violence.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517712275 Google Scholar
  24. Fajnzylber, P., Lederman, D., & Loayza, N. (2002). Inequality and violent crime. The Journal of Law and Economics, 45(1), 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gaviria, A., & Vélez, C. E. (2001). Who bears the burden of crime in Colombia? Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  26. Gaviria, A., Medina, C., Morales, L., & Núñez, J. (2010). The cost of avoiding crime: The case of Bogotá. In The economics of crime: Lessons for and from Latin America (pp. 101–132). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  27. Hipp, J. R. (2007). Income inequality, race, and place: Does the distribution of race and class within neighborhoods affect crime rates? Criminology, 45(3), 665–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kennedy, L. W., & Van Brunschot, E. G. (2009). The risk in crime. Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  29. Kennedy, L. W., Caplan, J. M., Piza, E. L., & Buccine-Schraeder, H. (2015). Vulnerability and exposure to crime: Applying risk terrain modeling to the study of assault in Chicago. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy, 1–20.Google Scholar
  30. Kennedy, L. W., & Caplan, J. M. (2012). A theory of risky places. Research brief. Newark: Rutgers Center on Public Security.Google Scholar
  31. Krahn, H., Hartnagel, T. F., & Gartrell, J. W. (1986). Income inequality and homicide rates: Cross-National Data and criminological theories. Criminology, 24, 269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. LeBeau, J. L. (2011). Sleeping with strangers: Hotels and motels as crime attractors and crime generators. Patterns, Prevention, and Geometry of Crime, 77–102.Google Scholar
  33. Levine, N., Wachs, M., & Shirazi, E. (1986). Crime at bus stops: A study of environmental factors. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 339–361.Google Scholar
  34. Llorente, M. V., Escobedo, R., Echandía, C., & Rubio, M. (2001). Violencia homicida en Bogotá: más que intolerancia. Bogota: CEDE Universidad de Los Andes.Google Scholar
  35. Moser, C., Winton, A., & Moser, A. (2005). Violence, fear, and insecurity among the urban poor in Latin America. The Urban Poor in Latin America, 125.Google Scholar
  36. Park, R. E., Burgess, E. W., & McKenzie, R. D. (1925). The City. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
  37. Piza, E., Feng, S., Kennedy, L., & Caplan, J. (2017). Place-based correlates of motor vehicle theft and recovery: Measuring spatial influence across neighborhood context. Urban Studies, 54(13), 2998–3021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ratcliffe, D. (Ed.). (2012). A nature conservation review: Volume 1: The selection of biological sites of national importance to nature conservation in Britain (Vol. 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Roncek, D. W., & Faggiani, D. (1985). High schools and crime: A replication. The Sociological Quarterly, 26(4), 491–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Roncek, D. W., & Pravatiner, M. A. (1989). Additional evidence that taverns enhance nearby crime. Sociology and Social Research, 73(4), 185–188.Google Scholar
  41. Sampson, R. J. (2012). Great American city: Chicago and the enduring neighborhood effect. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shaw, C. R., & McKay, H. D. (1942). Juvenile delinquency and urban areas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  43. Soares, R. R., & Naritomi, J. (2010). Understanding high crime rates in Latin America: The role of social and policy factors. In The economics of crime: Lessons for and from Latin America (pp. 19–55). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  44. Thibert, J., & Osorio, G. A. (2014). Urban segregation and metropolitics in Latin America: The case of Bogotá, Colombia. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(4), 1319–1343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Uribe-Mallarino, C. (2008). Estratificación social en Bogotá: de la política pública a la dinámica de la segregación social. Universitas Humanística, 65(65).Google Scholar
  46. Wortley, R. K., & Mazerolle, L. (2008). Environmental criminology and crime analysis: situating the theory, analytic approach and application. In: R. K. Wortley & L. Mazerolle (Eds.), Environmental criminology and crime analysis (pp. 1–18). Willan: Cullompton, Devon.Google Scholar
  47. Yunda, J. G. (2017). "Juntos pero no revueltos": the influence of the social stratification system on urban densification patterns in Bogotá, Colombia. Doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Rutgers Center on Public SecurityRutgers UniversityNewarkUSA
  2. 2.Department of Sociology and Criminal JusticeUniversity of ArkansasFayettevilleUSA

Personalised recommendations