Pathways Towards New Criminalisation: The Case of Stalking in Portugal

Article

Abstract

Stalking, which is a form of interpersonal violence, has been increasing and has a significant impact on affected victims. However, despite established scientific consensus, the juridical–legal system, specifically in Europe, is still extremely asymmetric. Portugal, compelled by scientific data and the Istanbul Convention, was the most recent country to approve specific legislation against stalking. In this critical review, we describe the previous national situation and provide examples from other countries to elucidate the trajectory of the recent criminalisation process, analyse the existing legal content and reflect upon the implications and challenges associated with this legal progression.

Keywords

Stalking Criminalisation Implications Challenges 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was partially conducted at Psychology Research Centre (UID/PSI/01662/2013), University of MInho, and supported by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology and the Portuguese Ministry of Science, Technology and Higher Education through national funds and co-financed by FEDER through COMPETE2020 under the PT2020 Partnership Agreement (POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007653).

References

  1. APAV (2015). Estatísticas APAV. Relatório anual 2014 [Statistical Data APAV. Annual report 2014]. Retrieved from http://www.apav.pt/apav_v3/images/pdf/Estatisticas_APAV_Relatorio_Anual_2014.pdf
  2. APAV (2016). Estatísticas APAV. Relatório anual 2015 [Statistical Data APAV. Annual report 2015]. Retrieved from http://apav.pt/apav_v3/images/pdf/Estatisticas_APAV_Relatorio_Anual_2015.pdf
  3. Campbell, J. C., Glass, N., Sharps, P. W., Laughon, K., & Bloom, T. (2007). Intimate partner homicide. Review and implications of research and policy. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 8(3), 246–269. doi: 10.1177/1524838007303505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Coelho, C., & Gonçalves, R. A. (2007). Stalking: Uma outra dimensão da violência conjugal [Stalking: Another dimension of conjugal violence]. Revista de Política e Ciência Criminal, 17, 269–302.Google Scholar
  5. Costa, S. (2011). Stalking: Prevalência junto dos profissionais de saúde mental [Prevalence among mental health professionals] (Unpublished master’s thesis). School of Psychology, University of Minho, Portugal.Google Scholar
  6. Council of Europe (2011). Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence. Retrieved from https://rm.coe.int/CoERMPublicCommonSearchServices/DisplayDCTMContent?documentId=090000168008482e
  7. Cunha, O., & Gonçalves, R. A. (2011). Tratamento de agressores domésticos: O programa de promoção e intervenção com agressores conjugais (PPRIAC) [treatment of domestic offenders: The promotion and intervention program with conjugal offenders]. Revista do Ministério Público, 127, 179–204.Google Scholar
  8. De Fazio, L. (2009). The legal situation on stalking among the European member states. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 15, 229–242. doi: 10.1007/s10610-009-9101-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fazio, D. (2011). Criminalization of stalking in Italy: One of the last among the current european member states’ anti-stalking laws. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 29, 317–323. doi: 10.1002/bsl.983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dennison, S. M., & Thomson, D. M. (2005). Criticisms or plaudits for stalking laws? What psychological research tell us about proscribing stalking. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 11(3), 384–406. doi: 10.1037/1076-8971.11.3.384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ferreira, C., & Matos, M. (2013a). Post-relationship stalking: The experience of victims with and without history of partner abuse. Journal of Family Violence, 28, 393–402. doi: 10.1007/s10896-013-9501-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ferreira, C., & Matos, M. (2013b). Violência doméstica e stalking pós-rutura: Dinâmicas, coping e impacto psicossocial na vítima [domestic violence and post-relationship stalking: Dynamics, coping and victim’s psycho-social impact]. Psicologia, XXVII(2), 81–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ferreira, C., Costa, S., & Matos, M. (2014). Stalking: Como intervir com as vítimas? [stalking: How to intervene with victims?]. In M. Matos (Ed.), (Coord.), Vítimas de crime e violência: Práticas de intervenção (pp. 73–86). Braga: Psiquilibrios Edições.Google Scholar
  14. Grangeia, H., & Matos, M. (2010). Stalking: Consensos e controvérsias [Stalking: Agreement and disagreement]. In C. Machado (Ed.), (Coord.) Novas formas de vitimação criminal (pp. 121–166). Braga: Psiquilibrios Edições.Google Scholar
  15. Grangeia, H., & Matos, M. (2013). ‘Stalking’- the Portuguese case: Discursive constructions of stalking and their implications. In S. Petrie (Ed.), Controversies in policy research. Critical analysis for a new era of austerity and privation (pp. 36–56). Hampshire: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  16. Kamphuis, J. H., & Emmelkamp, P. M. G. (2001). Traumatic distress among support-seeking female victims of stalking. American Journal of Psychiatry, 158(5), 795–798. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.158.5.795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kuehner, C., Gass, P., & Dressing, H. (2007). Increased risks of mental disorders among life-time victims of stalking – Findings from a community study. European Psychiatry, 22(3), 142–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lyndon, A. E., Sinclair, H. C., MacArthur, J., Fay, B., Ratajack, E., & Collier, K. E. (2012). An introduction to issues of gender in stalking research. Sex Roles, 66, 299–310. doi: 10.1007/s11199-011-0106-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. MacKenzie, R. D., & James, M. A. (2011). Management and treatment of stalkers: Problems, options, and solutions. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 29, 220–239. doi: 10.1002/bsl.980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. MAI (2016). Relatório Anual de Segurança Interna 2015 [Annual report of internal security 2015]. Retrieved from http://www.portugal.gov.pt/pt/pm/documentos/20160331-pm-rasi.aspx
  21. Matos M., Grangeia H., Ferreira, C., & Azevedo, V. (2011a). Inquérito de vitimação por stalking. Relatório de investigação [Stalking victimization survey. Research report]. Retrieved from http://repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt/bitstream/1822/31235/1/Inquérito%20de%20vitimação%20por%20Stalking%20cópia.pdf
  22. Matos, M., Grangeia, H., Ferreira, C., & Azevedo, V. (2011b). Stalking: Boas práticas no apoio à vítima. Manual para profissionais [Stalking: Good practice in victim support. Manual for professionals]. Retrieved from http://www.igualdade.gov.pt/IMAGES/STORIES/DOCUMENTOS/DOCUMENTACAO/PUBLICACOES/STALKING.PDF
  23. Matos, M., Grangeia, H., Ferreira, C., & Azevedo, V. (2012a). Stalking in Portugal: Facing a remarkable challenge. Rassegna Italiana di Criminologia, 3, 188–194.Google Scholar
  24. Matos, M., Grangeia, H., Ferreira, C., & Azevedo, V. (2012b). Vitimação por stalking: Preditores do medo [stalking victimization: Predictors of fear]. Análise Psicológica, XXX(1–2), 161–176.Google Scholar
  25. McEwan, T. E., Pathé, M., & Ogloff, J. R. P. (2011). Advances in stalking risk assessment. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 29, 180–201. doi: 10.1002/bsl.973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McFarlane, J., Campbell, J. C., & Watson, K. (2002). Intimate partner stalking and femicide: Urgent implications for women’s safety. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 20, 51–68. doi: 10.1002/bsl.477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McKeon, B., McEwan, T. E., & Luebbers, S. (2014). “It’s not really stalking if you know the person”: Measuring community attitudes that normalize, justify and minimise stalking. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 1–16. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2014.945637.
  28. Mechanic, M. B. (2002). Stalking victimization: Clinical implications for assessment and intervention. In K. E. Davies, I. H. Frieze, & R. D. Maiuro (Eds.), Stalking. Perspectives on victims and perpetrators (pp. 31–61). New York: Springer Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  29. Melton, H. C. (2007). Stalking in the context of intimate partner violence. In the victims’words. Feminist Criminology, 2(4), 347–363. doi: 10.1177/1557085107306517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mullen, P. E., Pathé, M., & Purcell, R. (2001). Stalking: New constructions of human behaviour. Australian and New Zealand of Psychiatry, 35, 9–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Novo, F., Pereira, F., & Matos, M. (2014). Cyber-aggression among portuguese adolescentes: A study on perpetration, victim-offender overlap and parental supervision. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 8(2), 94–110.Google Scholar
  32. Pereira, F., & Matos, M. (2015). Cyber-stalking victimization: What predicts fear among portuguese adolescentes? European Jornal on Criminal Policy and Research, 21(2), 1–18. doi: 10.1001/s10610-015-9285-7.Google Scholar
  33. Pereira, F., Matos, M., Sheridan, L., & Scott, A. J. (2014). Perceptions and personal experiences of unwanted attention among portuguese male students. Psychology, Crime & Law, 21(4), 398–411. doi: 10.1080/1068316X.2014.989167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pereira, F., Spitzberg, B. H., & Matos, M. (2016). Cyber-harassment victimization in Portugal: Prevalence, fear and help-seeking among adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 136–146. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Petch, E. (2002). Anti-stalking laws and the protection from harassment act 1997. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry, 13(1), 19–34. doi: 10.1080/09585180210123267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rosenfeld, B. (2003). Recidivism in stalking and obsessional harassment. Law and Human Behavior, 27(3), 251–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Saavedra, R., Martins, C., & Machado, C. (2013). Relacionamentos íntimos juvenis. Programa para a prevenção da violência [Juveniles intimate relationships. Program for the prevention of violence]. Psicologia, XXVII(1), 115–132.Google Scholar
  38. Spitzberg, B. H., & Cupach, W. R. (2003). What made pursuit? Obsessive relational intrusion and stalking related phenomena. Agression and Violent Behabior, 8(4), 345–375. doi: 10.1016/S1359-1789(02)00068-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Spitzberg, B. H., & Cupach, W. R. (2007). The state of the art of stalking: Taking stock of the emerging literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12, 64–86. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2006.05.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Thaller, S. (2007). National chapters: Austria. In Modena Group on Stalking (Ed.), Protecting women from the new crime of stalking: A comparison of legislative approaches within the European Union – Final report (pp. 73–74). Italy: University of Modena and Reggio Emilia Available at: http://www.europeanrights.eu/public/commenti/stalking_testo.pdf.Google Scholar
  41. van der Aa, S. (2010). Stalking in the Netherlands. Nature and prevalence of the problem and the effectiveness of anti-stalking measures. Portland: Maklu Uitgevers.Google Scholar
  42. van der Aa, S., & Romkens, R. (2013). The state of the art in stalking legislation: Reflections on European developments. European Criminal Law Review, 3(2), 232–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Voss, H., & Hoffmann, J. (2007). National chapters: Germany. In Modena Group on Stalking (Ed.), Protecting women from the new crime of stalking: A comparison of legislative approaches within the European Union – Final report (pp. 86–87). Italy: University of Modena and Reggio Emilia Available at: http://www.europeanrights.eu/public/commenti/stalking_testo.pdf.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universidade Lusófona do PortoPortoPortugal
  2. 2.Universidade do MinhoBragaPortugal

Personalised recommendations