Advertisement

Parental Criminality, Family Violence and Intergenerational Transmission of Crime Within a Birth Cohort

  • Marianne Junger
  • Jack Greene
  • Ruth Schipper
  • Floreyne Hesper
  • Veronique Estourgie
Article

Abstract

Previous studies documented that crime is heavily concentrated in families. However, many studies relied on relatively small samples, often males and information on criminal involvement was self-reported. The present study investigates: (1) the prevalence of arrests in three generations; (2) the concentration of offenders and arrests within families; (3) the relationships between arrests among the relatives; (4) the relationship between arrests and family violence. A complete cohort of the families in which a child was born in a Dutch city was selected, and the arrests of all known family members (siblings, parents and grandparents) were investigated. Results showed that 7.2 % of the mothers and 18 % of the fathers had been arrested. The likelihood of parental arrests was related to the likelihood of grandparental arrests. There was clear evidence for assortative mating: when the mother was arrested, the likelihood that the father was arrested was increased with a factor five. Maternal arrests were also related to arrests of her parents-in-law. Arrests are heavily concentrated within families, 7.8 % of the families account for 52.3 % of the suspects. Arrests in family members constitute a major risk factor for poor developmental outcomes, such as criminal behavior. At the time of birth, it is possible to use information on arrests to select children who are at relatively high risk for the target of prevention efforts.Implications for prevention policies are discussed.

Keywords

Criminal risk Crime prevention Family violence Intergenerational transmission Police contact Risk assessment 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the police force of Gelderland-Zuid for their help with the data collection. They also wish to thank dr. Hans H. L. Hendrickx for his critical reviews of previous versions. Part of this work was done while Marianne Junger worked at the Department of Developmental Psychology of Utrecht University and Floreyne Hepser worked at the police Force Gelderland-Zuid.

References

  1. Appel, A. E., & Holden, G. W. (1998). The co-occurrence of spouse and physical child abuse: a review and appraisal. Journal of Family Psychology, 12(4), 578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bardone, A. M., Moffitt, T. E., Caspi, A., Dickson, N., Stanton, W. R., & Silva, P. A. (1998). Adult physical health outcomes of adolescent girls with conduct disorder, depression, and anxiety. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 37, 594–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beaver, K. M. (2012). The familial concentration and transmission of crime. Criminal Justice and Behavior. doi: 10.1177/0093854812449405.Google Scholar
  4. Bernasco, W. (2006). Co-offending and the choice of target areas in burglary. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 3(3), 139–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Besemer, S., & Farrington, D. P. (2012). Intergenerational transmission of criminal behaviour: conviction trajectories of fathers and their children. European Journal of Criminology, 9(2), 120–141. doi: 10.1177/1477370811422801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Campbell, S. B. (1995). Behavior problems in preschool children: a review of recent research. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 36, 113–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carlson, E. A. (1980). Commentary: R. L. Dugdale and the Jukes family: a historical injustice corrected. BioScience, 30, 535–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carneiro, P., & Heckman, J. J. (2003). Human capital policy. Discussion paper No 821. Bonn, Germany: institute for the study of labor.Google Scholar
  9. Cicchetti, D., & Toth, S. L. (2005). Child maltreatment. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1(1), 409–438. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102803.144029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dogan, S. J., Conger, R. D., Kim, K. J., & Masyn, K. E. (2007). Cognitive and parenting pathways in the transmission of antisocial behavior from parents to adolescents. Child Development, 78(1), 335–349. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01001.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Elks, M. A., & O’Brien, J. (2005). Visual indictment: a contextual analysis of the kallikak family photographs. Mental Retardation, 43(4), 268–280. doi: 10.1352/0047-6765(2005)43[268:viacao]2.0.co;2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Elliott, D. S. (1993). Health-enhancing and health-compromising lifestyles. In S. G. Millstein, A. C. Petersen, & E. O. Nightingale (Eds.), Promoting the health of adolescents. New directions for the twenty-first century (pp. 119–145). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Fancher, R. E. (1987). Henry Goddard and The Kallikak Family photographs: “Conscious skulduggery” or “Whig history”? American Psychologist, 42, 585–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fantuzzo, J. W., & Fusco, R. A. (2007). Children’s direct exposure to types of domestic violence crime: a population-based investigation. Journal of Family Violence, 22(7), 543–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Farrington, D. P. (2007). Childhood risk factors and risk-focussed prevention. In M. Maguire, R. Morgan, & R. Reiner (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Criminology (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Farrington, D. P., Barnes, G. C., & Lambert, S. (1996). The concentration of offending in families. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 1, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Farrington, D. P., Jolliffe, D., Loeber, R., Stouthamer-Loeber, M., & Kalb, L. M. (2001). The concentration of offenders in families, and family criminality in the prediction of boys’ delinquency. Journal of Adolescence, 24, 579–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Farrington, D. P., Coid, J. W., Harnett, L. M., Jolliffe, D., Soteriou, N., Turner, R. E., et al. (2006). Criminal careers up to age 50 and life success up to age 48: new findings from the Cambridge Study in Delinquent Development (p. 94). London: Home Office Research, Development and Statistics.Google Scholar
  19. Freeman, R. B. (1983). Crime and unemployment. In J. Q. Wilson (Ed.), Crime and public policy (pp. 89–106). San Francisco: Institue for Contemporary Studies.Google Scholar
  20. Glueck, S., & Glueck, E. (1950). Unraveling Juvenile Delinquency. New York: The Commonwealth Fund, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Goddard, H. H. (1912). The Kallikak Family: A Study in the Heredity of Feeble-Mindedness. New York: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Greene, J. R. (1998). Communities and Crime: Reflections on Strategies for Crime Control. In, What Can the Federal Government Do To Decrease and Revitalize Communities? (pp. 45–54). Washington, D.C.: Executive Office for Weed and Seed, U.S. Department of JusticeGoogle Scholar
  23. Hagell, A., & Jeyarajah-Dent, R. (1999). Children in danger of violence from their carers. In H. Kemshall & J. Pritchard (Eds.), Good practice in working with violence (pp. 168–189). Edgware Middlesex: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
  24. Heckman, J. J. (2006). Skill formation and the economics of investing in disadvantaged children. Science, 312(5782), 1900–1902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hjalmarsson, R., & Lindquist, M. J. (2012). Like Godfather, Like Son. Journal of Human Resources, 47(2), 550–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Huesmann, L. R., Eron, L. D., & Warnick Yarmel, P. (1987). Intellectual functioning and aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1), 232–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Johnson, J. G., Smailes, E., Cohen, P., Kasen, S., & Brook, J. S. (2004). Anti-social Parental Behaviour, Problematic Parenting and Aggressive Offspring Behaviour During Adulthood: A 25-Year Longitudinal Investigation. British Journal of Criminology, 44:915–930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Junger, M., West, R., & Timman, R. (2001). The relationship between criminal behavior and risky behavior in traffic. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 38, 439–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Junger-Tas, J., & Haen-Marshall, I. (1999). The self report methodology in crime research: strength and weaknesses. In M. Tonry, & D. P. Farrington (Eds.), Building a safer society: Strategic approaches to crime prevention (Vol. 25, pp. 291–367, Crime and Justice). Chicago Ill: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  30. Karoly, L. A. (2012). Building blocks for a strong preschool to early elementary education system (p. 4). Santa Monica: RAND Corporation.Google Scholar
  31. Klofas, J., & Hipple, N. K. (2006). Project Safe Neighborhoods: Strategic Interventions. Crime Incident Reviews: Case Study 3. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.Google Scholar
  32. Kodl, M. M., & Wakschlag, L. S. (2004). Does a childhood history of externalizing problems predict smoking during pregnancy? Addictive Behaviors, 29, 273–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kokko, K., & Pulkkinen, L. (2000). Aggression in childhood and long-term unemployment in adulthood: a cycle of maladaptation and some protective factors. Developmental Psychology, 36, 463–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Krueger, R. F., Moffitt, T. E., Caspi, A., Bleske, A., & Silva, P. A. (1998). Assortative mating for antisocial behavior: developmental and methodological implications. Behavior Genetics, 28(3), 173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Laub, J. H., & Vaillant, G. E. (2000). Delinquency and MORTALITY: A 50-Year Follow-Up Study of 1,000 Delinquent and Nondelinquent Boys. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 157, 96–102.Google Scholar
  36. Lykken, D. T., & Tellegen, A. (1993). Is human mating adventitious or the result of lawful choice? A twin study of mate selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(1), 56–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Margolin, G., & Gordis, E. B. (2000). The effects of family and community violence on children. Annual Review of Psychology, 51(1), 445–479. doi: doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mason, D. A., & Frick, P. J. (1994). The heritability of antisocial behavior: a meta-analysis of twin and adoption studies. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 16(4), 301–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Matthys, W. (2003). Oppositioneel-opstandige en antisociale gedragsstoornissen. In A. J. M. Bonnet-Breusers, R. A. Hirasing, K. Hoppenbrouwers, H. B. H. Rensen, & M. M. Wagenaar-Fischer (Eds.), Praktijkboek Jeugdgezondheidszorg (V3.21V3.226) (Vol. V3.2–1–V3.2–26). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  40. McMillan, H. L., Thomas, B. H., Jamieson, E., Walsh, C. A., Boyle, M. H., Shannon, H. S., et al. (2005). Effectiveness of home visitation by public-health nurses in prevention of the recurrence of child physical abuse and neglect: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 365, 1786–1793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Murray, J., Loeber, R., & Pardini, D. (2012). Parental involvement in the criminal justice system and the development of youth theft, marijuana use, depression, and poor academic performance. Criminology, 50(1), 255–302. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2011.00257.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Olds, D. L., Henderson, C. R. J., Cole, R., Eckenrode, J., Kitzman, H., Luckey, D., et al. (1998). Long-term effects of nurse home visitation on children’s criminal and antisocial behavior: 15-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Medical Association, 280(14), 1238–1244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Olds, D. L., Henderson, C. R. J., Kitzman, H. J., Eckenrode, J. J., Cole, R. E., & Tatelbaum, R. C. (1999). Prenatal and Infancy Home Visitation by Nurses: Recent Findings. A review of 20 years of research on a program that employs nurses as home visitors. The Future of children, 9, 44–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Olds, D. L., Kitzman, H. J., Cole, R. E., Hanks, C. A., Arcoleo, K. J., Anson, E. A., et al. (2010). Enduring effects of prenatal and infancy home visiting by nurses on maternal life course and government spending. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 164(5), 419–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Parsons-Pollard, N. (2011). Methodological concerns in the study of intergenerational transmission of criminal behavior and children of incarcerated parents. Open Family Studies Journal, 4(Suppl 2: M2), 96–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rafter, N. H. (Ed.). (1988). White trash: The eugenic family studies 1877–1919. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Rengert, G. F., Piquero, A. R., & Jones, P. R. (1999). Distance decay reexamined. Criminology, 37(2), 427–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rhee, S. H., & Waldman, I. D. (2002). Genetic and environmental influences on antisocial behavior: a meta-analysis of twin and adoption studies. Psychological Bulletin, 128(3), 490–529. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.128.3.490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Robins, L. N. (1966). Deviant children grown up. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.Google Scholar
  50. Robins, L. N., & Lewis, R. G. (1966). The Role of the Antisocial Family in School Completion and Delinquency: A Three-Generation Study. The Sociological Quarterly, 7(4), 500–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rutter, M., Silberg, J., O’Connor, T., & Simonoff, E. (1999). Genetics and child psychiatry: II. Empirical research findings. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 40, 19–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Schuhmann, E. M., Foote, R. C., Eyberg, S. M., Boggs, S. R., & Algina, J. (1998). Efficacy of parent–child interaction therapy: interim report of a randomized trial with short-term maintenance. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 27, 34–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schweinhart, L. J. (2004). The High/Scope Perry Preschool Study Through Age 40: Summary, Conclusions, and Frequently Asked Questions (p. 19). Ypsilanti: High/Scope Educational Research Foundation.Google Scholar
  54. Schweinhart, L. J., & Weikart, D. P. (1997). The high/Scope Perry preschool curriculum comparison study through age 23. [monograph]. Early Childhood Research Quaterly, 12, 117–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Serbin, L. A., Cooperman, J. M., Peters, P. L., Lehoux, P. M., Stack, D. M., & Schwartzman, A. E. (1998). Intergenerational transfer of psychosocial risk in women with childhood histories of aggression, withdrawal, or aggression and withdrawal. Developmental Psychology, 34, 1246–1262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Shepherd, J. P., & Farrington, D. P. (1995). Preventing crime and violence. British Medical Journal, 321, 271–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Shonkoff, J. P., & Meisels, S. J. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of early childhood intervention (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Smith, P., Goggin, C., & Gendreau, P. (2002). The effects of prison sentences and intermediate sanctions on recidivism: general effects and individual differences. Ottawa: Solicitor General Canada.Google Scholar
  59. Terlouw, G.-J. (1991). Criminaliteitspreventie onder allochtonen; evaluatie van een project voor Marokkaanse jongeren (Vol. WODC reeks nr. 109). Arnhem: Gouda Quint.Google Scholar
  60. Thomas, R., & Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J. (2007). Behavioral Outcomes of Parent–child Interaction Therapy and Triple P—Positive Parenting Program: A Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 35(3), 475–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Thornberry, T. P. (2009). The apple doesn’t fall far from the tree (or does it?): intergenerational patterns of antisocial behavior–the American Society of Criminology 2008 Sutherland Address. Criminology, 47(2), 297–325. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2009.00153.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Thornberry, T. P., Freeman-Gallant, A., Lizotte, A. J., Krohn, M. D., Smith, C. A., & Smith, C. A. (2003a). Linked lives: the intergenerational transmission of antisocial behavior. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 31, 1573–2835. Online.Google Scholar
  63. Thornberry, T. P., Hops, H., Conger, R. D., & Capaldi, D. M. (2003b). Replicated findings and future directions for intergenerational studies: closing comments. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 31, 201–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. van de Rakt, M., Nieuwbeerta, P., & de Graaf, N. D. (2008). Like father, like son. The Relationships between Conviction Trajectories of Fathers and their Sons and Daughters. British Journal of Criminology, 48, 538–556.Google Scholar
  65. Van Dijk, J. J. M. (1994). Security first. Tijdschrift voor Criminologie, 36, 19–24.Google Scholar
  66. Verona, E., & Sachs-Ericsson, N. (2005). The intergenerational transmission of externalizing behaviors in adult participants: the mediating role of childhood abuse. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 1135–1145. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.73.6.1135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Visher, C. A., Winterfield, L., & Coggeshall, M. (2006). systematic review of non-custodial employment programs: impact on recidivism rates of ex-offenders. In The Campbell Collaboration Reviews of Intervention and Policy Evaluations (C2-RIPE) (Vol. February, 2006, Vol. Philadelphia, PA: Campbell Collaboration).Google Scholar
  68. Wartna, B. S. J., Tollenaar, N., & Essers, A. A. M. (2005). Door na de gevangenis: een cijfermatig overzicht van de strafrechtelijke recidive onder ex-gedetineerden (Vol. 228, Onderzoek en beleid). Den Haag, The Netherlands: Boom.Google Scholar
  69. Widom, C. S., & Maxfield, M. G. (2001). An update on the ‘cycle of violence’ (p. 8). Washington: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.Google Scholar
  70. Wilson, J. Q., & Herrnstein, R. (1985). Crime and human nature. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  71. Wright, J. P., & Beaver, K. M. (2005). Do parents matter in creating self-control in their children? a genetically informed test of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s theory of low self-control. Criminology, 43(4), 1169–1202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Governance StudiesUniversity of TwenteEnschedeThe Netherlands
  2. 2.School of Criminology and Criminal JusticeNortheastern UniversityBostonUSA
  3. 3.HSK groepZwolleThe Netherlands
  4. 4.NijmegenThe Netherlands
  5. 5.Police Force Gelderland-ZuidNijmegenThe Netherlands
  6. 6.Industrial Engineering and Business Information SystemsSchool of Management and Governance, University of TwenteEnschedeThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations