Advertisement

European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research

, Volume 15, Issue 3, pp 279–291 | Cite as

Violent Stalkers. Detecting Risk Factors by the Police

  • Anne Groenen
  • Geert Vervaeke
Article

Abstract

In the experience of stalking victims a common element is the fear of physical violence. Until now risk factors that predict physical violence within stalking contexts have been carried out in relatively small, clinical-forensic samples. Consequently, the validity and practical utility of these risk factors in the law enforcement context remains unknown. Furthermore some risk factors have been identified in this research on the basis of information that is not available for or difficult to detect by the police in an early stage of the law enforcement process. The identification of risk factors of physical violence in stalking incidents in an early stage by the police was the subject of the presented study. Risk factors are identified based on literature, content analysis of police records and by testing interaction terms. Therefore 204 judicial files were analyzed, resulting in a five factor model predicting physical violence. Theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed.

Keywords

Detection Police Risk factors Stalking Violence 

References

  1. Bachman, R., & Paternoster, R. (1997). Statistical methods for criminology and criminal justice. New York: The McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  2. Budd, T., Mattinson, J., & Myhill, A. (2000). The extent and nature of stalking: Findings from the 1998 British Crime Survey. Londen: Home Office.Google Scholar
  3. Canter, D., & Ioannou, M. (2004). A multivariate model of stalking behaviours. Behaviormetrika, 31(2), 1–18.Google Scholar
  4. Dennison, S. M. (2007). Interpersonal relationships and stalking: identifying when to intervene. Law and Human Behavior, 31, 353–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Durlak, J. A. (1995). Understanding meta-analysis. In L. G. Grimm & P. R. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and understanding multivariate statistics (pp. 349–254). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  6. Farnham, F. R., & James, D. V. (2003). Stalking and serious violence. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 31, 432–439.Google Scholar
  7. Farnham, F. R., James, D. V., & Cantrell, P. (2000). Association between violence, psychosis, and relationship to victim in stalkers. The Lancet, 355, 199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Grann, M., & Länström, N. (2007). Actuarial assessment of violence risk. To weigh or not to weigh? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 22–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Groenen, A. (2006). Stalking. Risk factors of physical violence [Risicofactoren van fysiek geweld]. Antwerpen: Maklu.Google Scholar
  10. Hart, S. D. (2003). Violence risk assessment, an anchored narrative approach. In M. Vanderhallen, G. Vervaeke, P. J. Van Koppen & J. Goethals (Eds.), Much ado about crime: Chapters on psychology and law (pp. 209–230). Brussel: Politeia.Google Scholar
  11. James, D. V., & Farnham, F. R. (2006). In J. Hoffmann & H. G. W. Voß (Eds.), Psychologie Des Stalking (pp. 159–176). Frankfurt: Verlag für Polizeiwissenschaft.Google Scholar
  12. Kienlen, K. K., Birmingham, D. L., Solberg, K. B., O’Reagan, J. T., & Meloy, J. R. (1997). A comparative study of psychotic and nonpsychotic stalking. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 25, 317–334.Google Scholar
  13. Landau, S., & Everitt, B. S. (2005). A handbook of statistical analyses using SPSS. London: Chapman & Hall/CRC.Google Scholar
  14. Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J., Palarea, R., Cohen, J., & Rohling, M. (2000). Breaking up is hard to do: unwanted pursuit behaviors following the dissolution of a romantic relationship. Violence and Victims, 15, 73–90.Google Scholar
  15. Maris, E. (2003). Methods and techniques of psychology research, [Methoden en technieken van onderzoek in de psychologie]. Leuven: Acco.Google Scholar
  16. McEwan, T., Mullen, P. E., & Purcell, M. (2007). Identifying risk factors in stalking: a review of current research. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 30(1), 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Meloy, J. R. (2007). Editorial. Stalking: the state of the science. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 17(1), 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Meloy, J. R., Davis, B., & Lovette, J. (2001). Risk factors for violence among stalkers. Journal of Threat Assessment, 1, 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Morrison, K. A. (2001). Predicting violent behavior in stalkers: a preliminary investigation of canadian cases in criminal harassment. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 46, 1403–1010.Google Scholar
  20. Mullen, P. E., Pathé, M., Purcell, R., & Stuart, G. W. (1999). Study of stalkers. American Journal of Psychiatry, 156, 1244–1249.Google Scholar
  21. Mullen, P. E., Pathé, M., & Purcell, R. (2000). Stalkers and their victims. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Mullen, P. E., Mackenzie, R., Ogloff, J. R. P., Pathé, M., McEwan, T., & Purcell, R. (2006). Assessing and managing the risks in the stalking situation. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 34, 439–450.Google Scholar
  23. Nagelkerke, N. J. D. (1991). A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination. Biometrika, 78(3), 691–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Palarea, R., Zona, M., Lane, C., & Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J. (1999). The dangerous nature of intimate relationship stalking: threats, violence associated risk factors. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 17, 269–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Purcell, R., Pathé, M., & Mullen, P. E. (2002). The prevalence and nature of stalking in the Australian community. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 36, 114–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rosenfeld, B. (2004). Violence risk factors in stalking and obsessional harassment. A review and preliminary meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 31, 9–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rosenfeld, B., & Harmon, R. (2002). Factors associated with violence in stalking and obsessional harassment cases. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29, 671–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rosenfeld, B., & Lewis, C. (2005). Assessing violence risk in stalking cases: a regression tree approach. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 343–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schwartz-Watts, D., & Morgan, D. (1998). Violent versus non-violent stalkers. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 26, 241–254.Google Scholar
  30. Sheridan, L., & Boon, J. (2002). Stalker typologies: Implications for law enforcement. In J. Boon & L. Sheridan (Eds.), Stalking and psychosexual obsession, psychological perspectives for prevention, policing and treatment (pp. 63–81). Chichester: Wiley. Google Scholar
  31. Sinclair, H. C., & Frieze, I. H. (2000). Initial courtship behaviour and stalking: how should we draw the line? Violence and Victims, 15, 23–40.Google Scholar
  32. Spitzberg, B. H., & Cupach, W. R. (2007). The state of the art of stalking: taking stock of the emerging literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12, 64–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (1998). Stalking in America: Findings from the national violence against women survey. Washington: U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  34. Wright, R. E. (1995). Logistic regression. In L. G. Grimm & P. R. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and understanding multivariate statistics. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.KHK Geel, Department of Social WorkLeuvens Institute of CriminologyLeuvenBelgië
  2. 2.High Council of JusticeLeuvens Institute of CriminologyLeuvenBelgië
  3. 3.LINCLeuvenBelgië

Personalised recommendations