The Impact of Deterrence Policies on Reckless Driving: The Case of Portugal
- 205 Downloads
In this paper, we test the effect of three different criminal deterrence theory policy tools: criminal certainty, severity, and celerity of punishment. Whereas most criminal deterrence studies in this field focus on the former two components of deterrence theory, this study also examines the potential deterrent effect of the latter component. Using a time-series design with monthly data, we estimate the effects of an increase in the threat of punishment for traffic offenses resulting from a general increase in fines for traffic offenses, an increase in the probability of getting caught with a blood-alcohol concentration (BAC) level outside the legal limits, and the enactment of an “on-the-spot” fine payment policy in Portugal. We find strong evidence to support a severity effect. An increase in the statutory severity of sentence maxima for traffic violations leads to a decrease in accident and injury rates—approximately an average 0.5 percent reduction in monthly accident and injury rates. Changes in the BAC levels and the mandatory swift payment policy did not produce any convincing deterrence impact.
KeywordsBlood-alcohol concentration (BAC) level Deterrence celerity Deterrence severity On-the-spot payment Reckless driving
The authors would like to express their sincere appreciation and gratitude to Luís Aguiar-Conraria for useful comments on an earlier version of the manuscript. The Portuguese Science and Technology Foundation (FCT) and the Centre for Research on Public Policy and Administration (NEAPP) provided financial support for this project. We also appreciate the collaboration of the Portuguese Institute of Meteorology, António Ribeiro of the Portuguese Automobile Trade Association, and Fátima Tavares, Margarida Alexandre, Carlos Barroso, and Maria João Barros of the Department of Motor Vehicles in constructing the data set.
- CARE (EU Road Accidents Database). (2006). Road safety evolution in the european union. Brussels: European Commission/Directorate General Energy and Transport.Google Scholar
- European Commission (2006). An EU strategy to support member states in reducing alcohol related harm. Communication from the commission to the council, the European parliament, the European economic and social committee and the committee of regions. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
- Holcomb, R. L. (1938). Alcohol in relation to traffic accidents. Journal of the American Medical Association, 111, 1076–1085.Google Scholar
- Legge Jr., J. S. (1990). Reforming highway safety in New York State: an evaluation of alternative policy interventions. Social Science Quarterly, 71(2), 373–382.Google Scholar
- Legge, J. S. Jr., & Park, J. (1994). Policies to reduce alcohol-impaired driving: evaluation elements of deterrence. Social Science Quarterly, 75(3), 594–606.Google Scholar
- Pindyck, R. S., & Rubinfeld, D. L. (1998). Econometric models and economic forecasts, 4th Edition. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Snortum, J. R., & Berger, D. E. (1989). Drinking-driving compliance in the United States: perception and behavior in 1983 and 1986. Journal of Studies in Alcohol, 50, 306–319.Google Scholar
- Tay, R. (1999). The effectiveness of the anti-drink driving advertisement campaign in New Zealand. Road Transport Research, 8(4), 3–15.Google Scholar
- Tay, R. (2004). The relationship between public education and enforcement campaigns and their effectiveness in reducing speed related serious crashes. International Journal of Transport Economics, 31(2), 251–255.Google Scholar