Trait Anxiety and Biased Prospective Memory for Targets Associated with Negative Future Events
- 304 Downloads
Cognitive models propose that elevated trait anxiety is associated with selective memory for negative information, although often no such effects are observed on tests of retrospective memory. One possibility is that no anxiety-linked biases in memory processes exists, however an alternative hypothesis is that trait anxiety may be associated with a bias in prospective memory, the process of remembering to carry out activities in the future. In two studies, high and low trait-anxious participants completed a prospective memory paradigm consisting of a lexical-decision task with embedded prospective memory targets. These targets signalled either negative (aversive noise burst) or benign (small monetary gain) future events. In both studies, results showed no significant effect of trait anxiety on prospective memory performance, and no interaction with target type. Thus, these results are in line with the research on anxiety-linked biases in retrospective memory, showing no evidence for a bias in prospective memory.
KeywordsAnxiety Cognitive bias Memory bias Prospective memory
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
LN and CM were supported in part by the Australian Research Council under Grant FL170100167. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Authors PC and EJ declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (national and institutional). Informed consent was obtained from all individual subjects participating in the study.
Animal Rights Statements
No animal studies were carried out by the authors for this article.
- Barlow, D. H. (1988). Anxiety and its disorders: The nature and treatment of anxiety and panic. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Beck, A. T., & Clark, D. A. (1997). An information processing model of anxiety: Automatic and strategic processes. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 35(1), 49–58.Google Scholar
- Beck, A. T., Emery, G., & Greenberg, R. L. (1985). Anxiety disorders and phobias: a cognitive perspective. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Bower, G. H. (1981). Mood and memory. American Psychologist, 36(2), 129–148.Google Scholar
- Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1999). Affective norms for English words (ANEW): Instruction manual and affective ratings. Gainesville: University of Florida.Google Scholar
- Cherry, K. E., & LeCompte, D. C. (1999). Age and individual differences influence prospective memory. Psychology and Aging, 14(1), 60–76.Google Scholar
- Clarke, P. J. F., MacLeod, C., & Shirazee, N. (2008). Prepared for the worst: Readiness to acquire threat bias and susceptibility to elevate trait anxiety. Emotion, 8(1), 47–57.Google Scholar
- Cockburn, J., & Smith, P. T. (1994). Anxiety and errors of prospective memory among elderly people. British Journal of Psychology, 85(2), 273–282. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1994.tb02523.x.Google Scholar
- Derakshan, N., & Ansari, T. (2007). Anxiety reduces top down attentional control: Evidence from the antisaccade task. Psychophysiology, 44, S24–S24.Google Scholar
- Dobbs, A. R., & Reeves, M. B. (1996). Prospective memory: More than memory prospective memory: Theory and applications (pp. 199–225). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
- Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191.Google Scholar
- Hobbs, R. (1990). Noise and vibration. In J. Riley (Ed.), Safety at work. London: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
- Lissek, S., Levenson, J., Biggs, A. L., Johnson, L. L., Ameli, R., Pine, D. S., et al. (2008). Elevated fear conditioning to socially relevant unconditioned stimuli in social anxiety disorder. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 165(1), 124–132.Google Scholar
- Loft, S., & Remington, R. W. (2010). Prospective memory and task interference in a continuous monitoring dynamic display task. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Applied, 16(2), 145–147.Google Scholar
- Loft, S., & Remington, R. W. (2013). Wait a second: Brief delays in responding reduce focality effects inevent-based prospective memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(7), 1432–1447.Google Scholar
- MacLeod, C., & Mathews, A. (2004). Selective memory effects in anxiety disorders: An overview of research findings and their implications. In D. Reisberg & P. Hertel (Eds.), Memory and emotion (pp. 155–185). London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Mathews, A., Mogg, K., May, J., & Eysenck, M. (1989). Implicit and explicit memory bias in anxiety. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 98(3), 236–240.Google Scholar
- Notebaert, L., Jones, E., Clarke, P. J. F., & MacLeod, C. (2018). Trait anxiety and biased prospective memory for targets associated with negative future events—Dataset.Google Scholar
- Price, R. B., Wallace, M., Kuckertz, J. M., Amir, N., Graur, S., Cummings, L., et al. (2016). Pooled patient-level meta-analysis of children and adults completing a computer-based anxiety intervention targeting attentional bias. Clinical Psychology Review, 50, 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2016.09.009.Google Scholar
- Scholten, M. R., van Honk, J., Aleman, A., & Kahn, R. S. (2006). Behavioral inhibition system (BIS), behavioral activation system (BAS) and schizophrenia: Relationship with psychopathology and physiology. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 40(7), 638–645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2006.03.005.Google Scholar
- Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R., Lushene, R., Vagg, P., & Jacobs, G. (1983). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory STAI (Form Y): Self-Evaluation Questionnaire. Alto: Consulting Psychologist Press.Google Scholar
- Tripp, G., Tan, S., & Milne, J. (1995). Risk perception and anxiety. New Zealand Journal of Psychology. 24(2), 37–43.Google Scholar
- Vrijsen, J. N., Becker, E. S., Rinck, M., van Oostrom, I., Speckens, A., Whitmer, A., & Gotlib, I. H. (2014). Can memory bias be modified? The effects of an explicit cued-recall training in two independent samples. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 38(2), 217–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-013-9563-y.Google Scholar