Parental Emotion Socialization Strategies and Their Interaction with Child Interpretation Biases Among Children with Anxiety Disorders
- 628 Downloads
Children’s interpretations of events play a significant role in childhood anxiety, and research shows that the parenting environment, in particular, is an important contributor to the manner in which children interpret their experiences. This study examined associations between parental use of punitive and minimization reactions to children’s displays of negative affect, child interpretation biases (self-reports and computerized assessments), and child anxiety symptom severity in a clinical sample of children with anxiety disorders. Forty-four children between 8–12 years of age (M = 9.60, SD = 1.30; 52 % girls; 52 % African American) and their mothers (M = 38.48, SD = 6.86; 57 % married) participated in this study. Child interpretation biases were significantly associated with child-reported anxiety symptoms. Moderation analyses revealed a positive relation between self-reported interpretation biases and anxiety symptoms for children of low-minimization and low-punitive mothers. Likewise, a positive relation between computerized interpretation biases and mother-reported child anxiety symptoms was found for children of low-minimization and low-punitive mothers. However, a negative relationship between computerized interpretation biases and mother-reported child anxiety symptoms was found for children of high-minimization and high-punitive mothers. Findings and implications are discussed in the context of how these parental reactions may be addressed and incorporated in childhood anxiety treatments.
KeywordsChildren Parenting Cognitive biases Emotion socialization Interpretation biases
This research was supported by a Grant from the University of Mississippi Medical Center’s Intramural Research Support Program (IRSP; PI: Viana).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
Andres G. Viana, Laura J. Dixon, Erin N. Stevens and Chad Ebesutani declare that they have no conflicts of interest to declare.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
No animal studies were carried out by the authors for this article.
- Achenbach, T. M. (1991). Manual for the child behavior checklist/4–18 and 1991 profile. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.Google Scholar
- Albano, A. M., & Silverman, W. K. (1996). Anxiety disorders interview schedule for DSM-IV child version: clinician manual. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
- American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text revision). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
- Eisenberg, N., & Fabes, R. (1994). Mothers’ reactions to children’s negative emotions: Relations to children’s temperament and anger behavior. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 40, 138–156.Google Scholar
- Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., Carlo, G., & Karbon, M. (1992). Vicarious emotional responsiveness and social competence. In N. Eisenberg & R. A. Fabes (Eds.), New directions in child development (pp. 57–74). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Fabes, R. A., Eisenberg, N., & Bernzweig, J. (1990). The coping with children’s negative emotions scale. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
- Ginsburg, G. S., Drake, K. L., Tein, J. Y., Teetsel, R., & Riddle, M. A. (2015). Preventing onset of anxiety disorder in offspring of anxious parents: A randomized controlled trial of a family-based intervention. American Journal of Psychiatry. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2015.14091178. (Advance online publication).
- Hayes, A. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling [White paper]. Retrieved from http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf.
- Heitjan, D. F., & Basu, S. (1996). Distinguishing “missing at random” and “missing completely at random”. The American Statistician, 50, 207–213.Google Scholar
- Herbert, S. D., Harvey, E. A., Roberts, J. L., Wichowski, K., & Lugo-Candelas, C. I. (2013). A randomized controlled trial of a parent training and emotion socialization program for families of hyperactive preschool-aged children. Behavior Therapy, 44, 302–316. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2012.10.004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hogendoorn, S. M., Wolters, L. H., Haan, E., Lindauer, R. L., Tillema, A., Vervoort, L., et al. (2014). Advancing an understanding of the Anxiety Control Questionnaire for Children (ACQ-C) in clinically anxious and non-anxious youth: Psychometric properties, incremental prediction and developmental differences. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 36, 288–299. doi: 10.1007/s10862-013-9386-x.Google Scholar
- Holm, S. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6, 65–70.Google Scholar
- Hudson, J. L., & Rapee, R. M. (2004). From anxious temperament to disorder: An etiological model. In R. G. Heimberg, C. L. Turk, & D. S. Mennin (Eds.), Generalized anxiety disorder: Advances in research and practice (pp. 51–74). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Jarvis, B. G. (2012). DirectRT (Ver. 2012). [Computer Software]. New York: NY: Empirisoft.Google Scholar
- Leitenberg, H., Yost, L., & Carroll-Wilson, M. (1986). Negative cognitive errors in children: Questionnaire development, normative data, and comparisons between children with and without self-reported symptoms of depression, low self-esteem and evaluation anxiety. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, 528–536.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T., Wen, Z., Nagengast, B., & Morin, A. J. S. (2011). Moderation. In T. D. Little (Ed.), Oxford handbook of quantitative methods. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Merikangas, K., He, J., Burstein, M., Swanson, S. A., Avenevoli, S., Cui, L., et al. (2010). Lifetime prevalence of mental disorders in U.S. adolescents: Results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication-Adolescent Supplement (NCS-A). Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 49, 980–989. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2010.05.017.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Muris, P. (2010). Anxiety-related reasoning biases in children and adolescents. In J. Hadwin & A. Field (Eds.), Information-processing biases and anxiety: A developmental perspective (pp. 21–46). Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Remmes, C. S. (2012). Parental distress responding to adolescent negative emotionality: Influence on anxiety and depression symptom severity and treatment outcome (Doctoral dissertation, University of Miami). Retrieved from http://scholarlyrepository.miami.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1376&context=oa_theses.
- Reynolds, C. R., & Richmond, B. O. (1985). Revised Children’s Manifest Anxiety Scale manual. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.Google Scholar
- Sameroff, A. (Ed.). (2009). The transactional model of development: How children and contexts shape each other. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
- Silverman, W. K., & Albano, A. (1996). The anxiety disorders interview schedule for children for DSM-IV [Child and Parent Versions]. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
- Silverman, W. K., Saavedra, L. M., & Pina, A. A. (2001). Test-retest reliability of anxiety symptoms and diagnoses using the Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for DSM-IV: Child and Parent Versions. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 40, 937–944.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- SPSS, Inc. (2011). S.P.S.S. 20.0 base user’s guide. Chicago: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Baltimore, MD: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
- Vassilopoulos, S., Banerjee, R., & Prantzalou, C. (2009). Experimental modification of interpretation bias in socially anxious children: Changes in interpretation, anticipated interpersonal anxiety, and social anxiety symptoms. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 47, 1085–1089.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar