A Feeling You Can’t Let Go: Temporal Stability and Vulnerability to Thought–Shape Fusion in Eating Disorders
- 200 Downloads
Thought–shape fusion (TSF) is a belief that entails perceptions of weight gain, moral transgression, and body dissatisfaction when thinking about food consumption. The objectives of the current study were to (1) investigate whether high TSF endorsement is associated with differences in cognitive, affective and behavioural reactions to a TSF induction in comparison to those who are low in TSF, and (2) evaluate whether TSF shows temporal stability. TSF was assessed in 32 individuals with eating disorders over a 1-month period. Participants were classified as either low (n = 16) or high (n = 16) in trait TSF. Participants attended three sessions (baseline, experimental session, and follow-up), and were exposed to a TSF induction during the experimental session. High correlations were found for trait TSF scores between baseline and follow-up appointments. Furthermore, high TSF individuals were more vulnerable to the induction, with higher negative affect and state TSF, and more food-related thoughts at follow-up in comparison to those low in TSF. These findings indicate that TSF is a stable belief holding clinical relevance.
KeywordsThought–shape fusion Cognitive distortions Eating disorders Clinical cut-off
The authors would like to thank Samantha Wilson for her help with coordination of this research project, as well as the staff at the Eating Disorder Program at the Douglas Institute for their help with recruitment. This research was supported by the Douglas Mental Health University Institute Foundation. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee at the Douglas Mental Health University Institute.
Conflict of Interest
Catherine Ouellet-Courtois, Jennifer S. Coelho, Adam S. Radomsky, Mimi Israël and Howard Steiger declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Participants provided informed consent before enrolling in the study, and were debriefed upon study completion. Participants were also informed that they could withdraw from the study at any point.
No animal studies were carried out by the authors for this article.
- Akdemir, A., Inandi, T., Akbas, D., Karaoglan Kahilogullari, A., Eren, M., & Canpolat, B. I. (2012). Validity and reliability of a Turkish version of the body shape questionnaire among female high school students: Preliminary examination. European Eating Disorders Review, 20, 114–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders—Test revision (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
- Berg, K. C., Peterson, C. B., Frazier, P., & Crow, S. J. (2012). Psychometric evaluation of the eating disorder examination and eating disorder examination questionnaire: A systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 45, 428–438.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Coelho, J. S., Wilson, S., Winslade, A., Thaler, L., Israel, M., & Steiger, H. (2014). Over- evaluation of thoughts about food: Differences across eating-disorder subtypes and a preliminary examination of treatment effects. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 47, 302–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fuhrer, R. R., & Rouillon, F. F. (1989). La version française de l’échelle CES-D (Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale). Description et traduction de l’échelle d’autoévaluation. European Psychiatry, 4, 163–166.Google Scholar
- Krabbenborg, M. A., Danner, U. N., Larsen, J. K., Veer, N., Elburg, A. A., Ridder, D. T., & Engels, R. C. (2012). The Eating Disorder Diagnostic Scale: Psychometric features within a clinical population and a cut-off point to differentiate clinical patients from healthy controls. European Eating Disorders Review, 20, 315–320.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lecrubier, Y. Y., Sheehan, D. V., Weiller, E. E., Amorim, P. P., Bonora, I. I., Sheehan, K., & Dunbar, G. C. (1997). The mini international neuropsychiatric interview (MINI): A short diagnostic structured interview: Reliability and validity according to the CIDI. European Psychiatry, 12, 224–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar