Cognitive Therapy and Research

, Volume 37, Issue 2, pp 380–382 | Cite as

Instruction in Problem-Solving Skills Increases the Hedonic Balance of Highly Neurotic Individuals

  • Jaclyn Stillmaker
  • Tim Kasser
Brief Report


Neuroticism is associated with ineffective coping strategies and experiencing substantial negative affect, but prior research has not examined whether teaching problem-solving skills can help neurotic individuals improve their emotional experience. 214 college students were screened for neuroticism and 30 participants who scored in the top two deciles of neuroticism were randomly assigned to a no-treatment control group or to an intervention group that received three lessons based on a problem-solving curriculum (Nezu et al. in Solving life’s problems: a 5-step guide to enhanced well-being. Springer, New York, 2007). Hedonic balance (i.e., positive minus negative affect) was measured before the intervention and again approximately 4 days and approximately 11 weeks after the intervention ended. Analyses revealed that the intervention group showed an increase in hedonic balance over time, whereas the control group showed no changes; improvements in hedonic balance were correlated with improvements in problem-solving strategies. Thus, it appears that teaching problem-solving can improve the emotional experience of neurotic individuals.


Problem-solving therapy Neuroticism Hedonic balance 



This project was supported in part through funds awarded by Knox College through a grant from the Paul K. Richter and Evalyn E. Cook Richter Memorial Trusts.


  1. Auerbach, R. P., Abela, J. R. Z., Ho, M.-H. R., McWhinnie, C. M., & Czaikowska, Z. (2010). A prospective examination of depressive symptomology: Understanding the relationship between negative events, self-esteem, and neuroticism. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 29, 438–461. doi: 10.1521/jscp.2010.29.4.438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boyes, M. E., & French, D. J. (2010). Neuroticism, stress, and coping in the context of an anagram-solving task. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(5), 380–385. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.04.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. D’Zurilla, T. J., & Nezu, A. M. (2007). Problem-solving therapy: A positive approach to clinical intervention. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  4. Eskin, M., Ertekin, K., & Demir, H. (2008). Efficacy of a problem-solving therapy for depression and suicide potential in adolescents and young adults. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 32, 227–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hambrick, E. P., & McCord, D. M. (2010). Proactive coping and its relation to the five-factor model of personality. Individual Differences Research, 8, 67–77.Google Scholar
  6. Harkness, K. L., Bagby, R. M., Joffe, R. T., & Levitt, A. (2002). Major depression, chronic minor depression, and the five-factor model of personality. European Journal of Personality, 16, 271–281. doi: 10.1002/per.441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Malouff, J. M., Thorsteinsson, E. B., & Schutte, N. S. (2007). The efficacy of problem-solving therapy in reducing mental and physical health problems: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 27, 46–57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1986). Personality, coping, and coping effectiveness in an adult sample. Journal of Personality, 54, 385–405. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1986.tb00401.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 81–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Nezu, A. M., Nezu, C. M., & D’Zurilla, T. J. (2007). Solving life’s problems: A 5-step guide to enhanced well-being. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  11. O’Brien, T. B., & DeLongis, A. (1996). The interactional context of problem-, emotion- and relationship-focused coping: The role of the big five personality factors. Journal of Personality, 64, 775–813. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1996.tb00944.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Saucier, G. (1994). Mini-markers: A brief version of Goldberg’s unipolar Big-Five markers. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63, 506–516. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6303_8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Watson, D., & Hubbard, B. (1996). Adaptational style and dispositional structure: Coping in the context of the five-factor model. Journal of Personality, 64, 737–774. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1996.tb00943.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyKnox CollegeGalesburgUSA

Personalised recommendations