Dysphoria and the Immediate Interpretation of Ambiguity: Evidence for a Negative Interpretive Bias in Error Rates But Not Response Latencies
- 183 Downloads
Cognitive theories of depression (Beck, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy: An International Quarterly. 1:5–37, 1987) predict that depressed individuals will have an increased tendency to interpret ambiguous information in a negative manner. Researchers have observed a negative interpretive bias in a variety of situations, but much of the evidence has come from studies that relied on participants’ self-reports and other tasks that are highly susceptible to response biases. Studies that have used semantic priming tasks to covertly probe participants’ immediate interpretations of ambiguity, and thereby avoid response biases, have not observed an interpretive bias (Lawson and MacLeod, Behaviour Research and Therapy. 37:463–474, 1999; Bisson and Sears, Cognition and Emotion. 21:614–645, 2007). The present study used a task better suited to measure interpretive biases in the immediate interpretation of ambiguity: the semantic relatedness decision task. Participants listened to self-referent ambiguous prime sentences (e.g., My boyfriend said that I am unlike his past girlfriends) and responded to visually presented target words related to a negative (jealous), positive (attractive), or neutral (relationship) interpretation of the sentence. The task was to quickly indicate whether or not the target was related to the ambiguous prime (a yes or no response). The expectation was that dysphoric participants would respond more quickly to targets related to the negative interpretations of the primes because they would be more likely to impose negative interpretations on the ambiguity. This was not the case. On the other hand, the error data revealed that dysphoric participants made fewer errors to targets related to the negative interpretations of the primes (i.e., fewer “no” responses to negatively-related targets) and made more errors to targets related to the positive interpretations of the primes, a pattern consistent with a negative interpretive bias. These findings demonstrate that the semantic relatedness task is a promising tool for the study of interpretive biases in dysphoria and depression.
KeywordsDepression Dysphoria Interpretation of ambiguity Negative bias
This research was supported by a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada grant to the first author. The materials used in the study are available from the authors upon request. We thank two anonymous reviewers for their excellent feedback and suggestions.
- Beck, A. T. (1987). Cognitive models of depression. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy: An International Quarterly, 1, 5–37.Google Scholar
- Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. K. (1996). Beck Depression Inventory Manual (2nd ed.). San Antonio: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
- Blanchette, I., and Richards, A. (2010). The influence of affect on higher level cognition: A review of research on interpretation, judgement, and decision making and reasoning. Cognition and Emotion, in press.Google Scholar
- Kucera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence: Brown University Press.Google Scholar
- Moretti, M. M., & Shaw, B. F. (1989). Automatic and dysfunctional cognitive processes in depression. In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 383–424). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Williams, J. M. G., Watts, F. N., MacLeod, C., & Mathews, A. (1997). Cognitive psychology and emotional disorders (2nd ed.). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar