Cognitive Therapy and Research

, Volume 35, Issue 5, pp 442–455 | Cite as

If-Then Plans Benefit Delay of Gratification Performance in Children With and Without ADHD

  • Caterina Gawrilow
  • Peter M. Gollwitzer
  • Gabriele Oettingen
Original Article


Children with impulse control deficits (i.e., children with ADHD) are known to have special problems with delaying gratifications. As making if-then plans (i.e., forming implementation intentions) has been found to benefit self-control even in individuals whose action control is chronically hampered (e.g., critical samples such as patients with frontal lobe damage, the elderly), we analyzed whether delay of gratification is facilitated in children with and without ADHD who have formed respective implementation intentions. In Study 1, forty-five inpatient children with ADHD (M age = 10.7 years) increased delay of gratification performance after having formed respective implementation intentions. Study 2 replicated this finding in an outpatient sample of children with ADHD (n = 47, M age = 10.3 years) and also in a comparison group of children without ADHD (n = 40, M age = 11.3 years). Results are discussed with respect to their implications for action control in children with ADHD as well as research on implementation intentions and delay of gratification.


If-then plans Self-control Delay aversion Delay of gratification ADHD 


  1. Aarts, H., Dijksterhuis, A. P., & Midden, C. (1999). To plan or not to plan? Goal achievement of interrupting the performance of mundane behaviors. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 971–979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  3. Anastopoulos, A. D., Rhoads, L. H., & Farley, S. E. (2006). Counseling and training parents. In R. A. Barkley (Ed.), ADHD: A handbook for diagnosis and treatment (3rd ed., pp. 453–479). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  4. Antrop, I., Roeyers, H., Van Oost, P., & Buysse, A. (2000). Stimulation seeking and hyperactivity in children with ADHD. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 41, 225–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arbeitsgruppe Deutsche Child Behavior Checklist. (1998). Elternfragebogen über das Verhalten von Kindern und Jugendlichen. Deutsche Bearbeitung der Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL/4–18) [German consensus version of the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL/4–18)]. Köln: Arbeitsgruppe Kinder-, Jugend- und Familiendiagnostik (KJFD).Google Scholar
  6. Barkley, R. A. (1990). Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A handbook for diagnosis and treatment. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  7. Barkley, R. A. (1997a). Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: Constructing a unifying theory of ADHD. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 65–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barkley, R. A. (1997b). Defiant children: A clinician’s manual for assessment and parent training. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  9. Bayer, U. C., Achtziger, A., Gollwitzer, P. M., & Moskowitz, G. (2009). Responding to subliminal cues: Do if-then plans cause action preparation and initiation without conscious intent? Social Cognition, 27, 183–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bayer, U. C., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2007). Boosting scholastic test scores by willpower: The role of implementation intentions. Self and Identity, 6, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brandstätter, V., Lengfelder, A., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2001). Implementation intentions and efficient action initiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 946–960.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chamberlain, S. R., & Sahakian, B. J. (2007). The neuropsychiatry of impulsivity. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 20, 255–261.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cohen, A.-L., Bayer, U. C., Jaudas, A., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2008). Self-regulatory strategy and executive control: Implementation intentions modulate task switching and Simon task performance. Psychological Research, 72, 12–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Douglas, V. I., & Parry, P. A. (1994). Effects of reward and nonreward on frustration and attention in attention deficit disorder. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 22, 281–302.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eigsti, I., Zayas, V., Mischel, W., Shoda, Y., Ayduk, O., Dadlani, M. B., et al. (2006). Predictive cognitive control from preschool to late adolescence and young adulthood. Psychological Science, 17, 478–484.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fallgatter, A. J., Ehlis, A. C., Seifert, J., Strik, W. K., Scheuerpflug, P., Zillessen, K. E., et al. (2004). Altered response control and anterior cingulate function in ADHD boys. Clinical Neurophysiology, 115, 973–981.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fischer, M., Barkley, R. A., Smallish, L., & Fletcher, K. (2005). Executive functioning in hyperactive children as young adults: Attention, inhibition, response perseveration, and the impact of comorbidity. Developmental Neuropsychology, 27, 107–133.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Frazier, T. W., Demaree, H. A., & Youngstrom, E. A. (2004). Meta-analysis of intellectual and neuropsychological test performance in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Neuropsychology, 18, 543–555.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gawrilow, C., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2008). Implementation intentions facilitate response inhibition in children with ADHD. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 32, 261–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gollwitzer, P. M. (1993). Goal achievement: The role of intentions. European Review of Social Psychology, 4, 141–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999). Implementation intentions. Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54, 493–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gollwitzer, P. M., & Brandstätter, V. (1997). Implementation intentions and effective goal pursuit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 186–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gollwitzer, P. M., & Sheeran, P. (2006). Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta-analysis of effects and processes. Advances of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 69–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Harris, K. R., Danoff-Friedlander, B., Saddler, B., Frizzelle, R., & Graham, S. (2005). Self-monitoring of attention versus self-monitoring of academic performance: Differential effects among students with ADHD in the regular classroom. Journal of Special Education, 39, 145–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Henderson, M. D., Gollwitzer, P. M., & Oettingen, G. (2008). Implementation intentions and disengagement from a failing course of action. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 20, 81–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jerome, L., Segal, A., & Habinski, L. (2006). What we know about ADHD and driving risk: A literature review, meta-analysis and critique. Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 15, 105–125.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Kuntsi, J., Stevenson, J., Oosterlaan, J., & Sonuga-Barke, E. J. S. (2001). Test-retest reliability of a new delay aversion task and executive measures. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 19, 339–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lengfelder, A., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2001). Reflective and reflexive action control in patients with frontal brain lesions. Neuropsychology, 15, 80–100.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Meichenbaum, D. H., & Goodman, J. (1971). Training impulsive children to talk to themselves: A means of developing self-control. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 77, 115–126.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Metcalfe, J., & Mischel, W. (1999). A hot/cool system analysis of delay of gratification: Dynamics of willpower. Psychological Review, 106, 3–19.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Milne, S., Orbell, S., & Sheeran, P. (2002). Combining motivational and volitional interventions to promote exercise participation: Protection motivation theory and implementation intentions. British Journal of Health Psychology, 7, 163–184.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mischel, W. (1958). Preference for delayed reinforcement: An experimental study of a cultural observation. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 56, 57–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mischel, W. (1974). Processes in delay of gratification. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in social psychology (pp. 249–292). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  35. Mischel, W. (1996). From good intentions to willpower. In P. M. Gollwitzer & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The psychology of action: Linking cognition and motivation to behavior (pp. 197–218). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  36. Mischel, W., Shoda, Y., & Rodriguez, M. L. (1989). Delay of gratification in children. Science, 244, 933–938.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nigg, J. T. (2001). Is ADHD a disinhibitory disorder? Psychological Bulletin, 127, 571–598.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Oosterlaan, J., Logan, G. D., & Sergeant, J. A. (1998). Response inhibition in ADHD, CD, comorbid ADHD +CD, anxious and normal children: A metaanalysis of studies with the stop task. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 39, 411–425.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Oosterlaan, J., & Sergeant, J. A. (1996). Inhibition in ADHD, aggressive, and anxious children: A biologically based model of child psychopathology. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 24, 19–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Orbell, S., Hodgins, S., & Sheeran, P. (1997). Implementation intentions and the theory of planned behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 945–954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Orbell, S., & Sheeran, P. (2000). Motivational and volitional processes in action initiation: A field study of the role of implementation intentions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 780–797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Parks-Stamm, E. J., Gollwitzer, P. M., & Oettingen, G. (2007). Action control by implementation intentions: Effective cue detection and efficient response initiation. Social Cognition, 25, 248–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Paul, I., Gawrilow, C., Zech, F., Gollwitzer, P. M., Rockstroh, B., Odenthal, G., et al. (2007). If-then planning modulates the P300 in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Neuro Report, 18, 653–657.Google Scholar
  44. Pelham, W. E., Wheeler, T., & Chronis, A. (1998). Empirically supported psychosocial treatments for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 27, 190–205.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rapport, M. D., Tucker, S. B., DuPaul, G. J., Merlo, M., & Stoner, G. (1986). Hyperactivity and frustration: The influence of control over size of rewards in delay of gratification. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 14, 191–204.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Reid, R., Trout, A. L., & Schartz, M. (2005). Self-regulation interventions for children with ADHD. Exceptional Children, 71, 361–377.Google Scholar
  47. Renner, G. (2002). Kritische Werte und Konfidenzintervalle zur Interpretation von HAWIK-III IQ Skalen, Index-Werten und Subtests [Differences required for significance and confidence intervals to aid the interpretation of HAWIK-III IQ scores, index-scores and subtests]. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 23, 353–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rodriguez, M. L., Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1989). Cognitive person variables in the delay of gratification in older children at risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 358–367.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sattler, J. M. (1992). Assessment of children’s intelligence. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  50. Scheres, A., Dijkstra, M., Ainslie, E., Balkan, J., Reynolds, B., Sonuga-Barke, E., et al. (2006). Temporal and probabilistic discounting of rewards in children and adolescents: Effects of age and ADHD symptoms. Neuropsychologia, 44, 2092–2102.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Scheres, A., Lee, A., & Sumiya, M. (2008). Temporal reward discounting and ADHD: Task and symptom specific effects. Journal of Neural Transmission, 115, 221–226.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Seidman, L. J. (2006). Neuropsychological functioning in people with ADHD across the lifespan. Clinical Psychology Review, 26, 466–485.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sheeran, P., & Orbell, S. (2000). Using implementation intentions to increase attendance for cervical cancer screening. Health Psychology, 18, 283–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Shoda, Y., Mischel, W., & Peake, P. (1990). Predicting adolescent cognitive and self-regulatory competencies from preschool delay of gratification: Identifying diagnostic conditions. Developmental Psychology, 26, 978–986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Solanto, M. V., Abikoff, H., Sonuga-Barke, E. J. S., Schachar, R., Logan, G. D., Wigal, T., et al. (2001). The ecological validity of delay aversion and response inhibition as measures of impulsivity in ADHD: A supplement to the NIMH multimodal treatment study of ADHD. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 29, 215–228.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sonuga-Barke, E. J. S. (2002). Psychological heterogenity in ADHD—A dual pathway model of behavior and cognition. Behavioral Brain Research, 130, 29–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sonuga-Barke, E. J. S., Sergeant, J. A., Nigg, J., & Willcutt, E. (2008). Executive dysfunction and delay aversion in ADHD: Nosological and diagnostic implications. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 17, 367–384.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sonuga-Barke, E. J. S., Taylor, E., Sembi, S., & Smith, J. (1992). Hyperactivity and delay aversion—I. The effect of delay on choice. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 33, 387–398.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sonuga-Barke, E. J. S., Williams, E., Hall, M., & Saxton, T. (1996). Hyperactivity and delay aversion—III. The effect on cognitive style of imposing delay after errors. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 37, 189–194.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Strayhorn, J. M. (2002). Self-control: Toward systematic training programs. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 41, 17–27.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tangney, J. P., Baumeister, R. F., & Boone, A. (2004). High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality, 72, 271–324.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Tewes, U., Rossmann, P., & Schallberger, U. (1999). Wechsler intelligence test for children, HAWIK-III. Bern: Huber.Google Scholar
  63. Webb, T. L., & Sheeran, P. (2004). Identifying good opportunities to act: Implementation intentions and cue discrimination. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 407–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Webb, T. L., & Sheeran, P. (2006). Does changing behavioral intentions engender behavior change? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 249–268.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Webb, T. L., & Sheeran, P. (2007). How do implementation intentions promote goal attainment? A test of component processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 295–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Webb, T. L., & Sheeran, P. (2008). Mechanisms of implementation intention effects: The role of goal intentions, self-efficacy, and accessibility of plan components. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 373–395.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. WHO. (1991). Internationale Klassifikation psychischer Störungen: ICD 10, Kapitel V. [Tenth revision of the international classification of diseases, Chapter V(F): Mental and behavioral disorders]. Bern: Huber.Google Scholar
  68. Yates, B. T., & Mischel, W. (1979). Young children’s preferred attentional strategies for delaying gratification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 286–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Caterina Gawrilow
    • 1
  • Peter M. Gollwitzer
    • 2
    • 3
  • Gabriele Oettingen
    • 2
    • 4
  1. 1.German Institute for International Educational Research (DIPF), Center for Individual Development and Adaptive Education of Children at Risk (IDeA)University of FrankfurtFrankfurtGermany
  2. 2.New York UniversityNew YorkUSA
  3. 3.University of KonstanzKonstanzGermany
  4. 4.University of HamburgHamburgGermany

Personalised recommendations