Cognitive Therapy and Research

, Volume 30, Issue 4, pp 445–456 | Cite as

Offense-Taking: Development and Validation of a Trait Self-Report Measure

  • David R. Sigmon
  • C. R. Snyder
Original article


Offense-taking is defined as the perceived deprivation of what is rightfully due to a person. Using this definition, a trait self-report measure of the proneness to take offense was developed and validated. The 16-item Offense-Taking Scale (OTS) yielded Cronbach α of .86 and .87, and a test–retest correlation over a 4-week interval of .76. Factor analyses revealed the two components of sensitivity (degree of reactivity to information as being offensive) and severity (degree of disruption related to taking offense). Support for convergent validity emerged from the predicted positive OTS correlations with hostility and arousability, and negative correlations with forgiveness, hope, concerns about making positive impressions, and life satisfaction. Potential OTS applications are discussed.


Appraisal Self-report scale Offense-taking Scale development Anger Cognitions 


  1. Arnold, M. B. (1960). Emotion and personality. Vol. 1: Psychological aspects. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bryant, F. B., & Yarnold, P. R. (1995). Principal-components analysis and exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. In L. G. Grimm, & P. R. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and understanding multivariate statistics (pp. 99–136). Washington, DC: APA.Google Scholar
  3. Buss, A. H. (1961). The psychology of aggression. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  4. Buss, A. H., & Durkee, A. (1957). An inventory for assessing different kinds of hostility. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 21(4), 343–349.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Coren, S. (1988). Prediction of insomnia from arousability scores: Scale development and cross-validation. Behavioural Research and Therapy, 26, 415–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Coren, S. (1990). The arousal predisposition scale: Normative data. Bulletin of Psychonomic Society, 28, 551–552.Google Scholar
  7. Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24(4), 349–354.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Deffenbacher, J. L. (1992). Trait anger: Theories, findings, and implications. In C. D. Spielberger, & J. N. Butcher (Eds.), Advances in personality assessment (Vol. 9, pp. 177–201). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  9. Dembrowski, T. M., MacDougall, J. M., Williams, R. B., Haney, T. L., & Blumenthal, J. A. (1985). Components of Type A, hostility, and anger-in: Relationship to angiographic findings. Psychosomatic Medicine, 47, 219–233.Google Scholar
  10. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gordon, R. M. (1987). The structure of emotions: Investigations in cognitive philosophy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Three methods for analyzing limited time-series (N of 1) data. Behavioral Assessment, 5(2), 141–154.Google Scholar
  13. Lazarus, R. S. (1968). Emotions and adaptation: Conceptual and empirical relations. In W. J. Arnold (Eds.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 175–270). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  14. Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Mackay, C., Cox, T., Burrows, G., & Lazzerini, T. (1978). An inventory for the measurement of self-reported stress and arousal. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 17, 283–284.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. McCormick, I. A., Walkey, F. H., & Taylor, A. J. W. (1985). The stress arousal checklist: An independent analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45, 143–146.Google Scholar
  17. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. Jr. (1983). Social desirability scales: More substance than style. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 882–888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Miller, T. Q., Smith, T. W., Turner, C. W., Guijarro, M. L., & Hallet, A. J. (1996). A meta-analytic review of research on hostility and physical health. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 322–348.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  20. Smith, C. A., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1987). Patterns of appraisal and emotion related to taking an exam. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 475–488.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Smith, C. A., & Lazarus, R. S. (1993). Appraisal components, core relational themes, and the emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 7, 233–269.Google Scholar
  22. Snyder, C. R. (1994). The psychology of hope: You can get there from here. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  23. Snyder, C. R. (2002). Hope theory: Rainbows in the mind. Psychological Inquiry, 13, 249–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Snyder, C. R., Crowson, J. J., Houston, B. K., Kurylo, M., & Poirier, J. (1997). Assessing hostile automatic thoughts: Development and validation of the HAT scale. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 21(4), 477–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Snyder, C. R., Harris, C., Anderson, J. R., Holleran, S. A., Irving, L. M., Sigmon, S. T., Yoshinobu, J. G., Langelle, C., & Harney, P. (1991). The will and the ways: Development and validation of an individual-differences measure of hope. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(4), 570–585.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sonnemans, J., & Frijda, N. H. (1994). The structure of subjective emotional intensity. Cognition and Emotion, 8(4), 329–350.Google Scholar
  27. Spielberger, C. D. (1988). State-trait anger expression inventory. Orlando, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  28. Spielberger, C. D., Jacobs, G., Russell, S., & Crane, R. (1983). Assessment of anger: The State-Trait Anger scale. In J. N. Butcher, & C. D. Spielberger (Eds.), Advances in personality assessment (Vol. 3, pp. 112–134). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  29. Tabachnik, B. G., & Videll, L. S. (1989). Using multivariate statistics. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  30. Thompson, L. Y., Snyder, C. R., Hoffman, L., Michael, S. T., Rasmussen, H. N., Billings, L. S., Heinze, L., Neufeld, J. E., Shorey, H. S., Roberts, J. C., & Roberts, D. J. (2005). Dispositional forgiveness of self, others, and situations. Journal of Personality, 73(2), 313–359.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of KansasLawrenceUSA

Personalised recommendations