Sociotropy, Autonomy, and Depressive Response to an Unconscious Challenge
- 84 Downloads
Important, but not unequivocal, support has been found for Sociotropy and Autonomy as vulnerability factors for depression. Using a novel approach we gave subliminal sociotropy-related and autonomy-related visuoverbal stimulation to nondepressed students (Study 1, N=36), and patients treated for clinical depression (Study 2, N=34) in completely balanced within-groups designs. Autonomy, as measured with the Personal Style Inventory, was unrelated to response. Sociotropy predicted negative outcome after a sociotropy-related abandonment stimulus in both Study 1 (r=−.34 to a decrease in positively valenced autobiographical memories) and Study 2 (r=.38 to an increase in selection of depression-related words on a word-selection task). This finding may interest developers of depression therapies, and support further attempts to study Sociotropy as a putative vulnerability factor for depression.
KEY WORDS:depression sociotropy autonomy anaclitic introjective dependency self-criticism; unconscious
We thank Anna Maria Carlsson for allowing us to use her translation of the Depressive Experiences Questionnaire. Joakim Axelsson translated the Personal Style Inventory. Thanks also to the Clinical Department of Psychiatry, Gävle-Sandviken County Hospital, and to Andreas Birgegård and Katja Claesson for interesting discussions on how to belong and be free at the same time.
- Bornstein, R. F., & Languirand, M. A. (2003). Healthy dependency: Leaning on others without loosing yourself. New York: Newmarket Press.Google Scholar
- Bowers, K. S. (1984). On being unconsciously influenced and informed. In Bowers, K. S., & Meichenbaum, D. (Eds.), The unconscious reconsidered (pp. 227–272). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Cheesman, J., & Merikle, P. M. (1986). Distinguishing conscious from unconscious perceptual processes. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 44(4), 343–367.Google Scholar
- Fisher, S., & Greenberg, R. P. (1996). Freud scientifically reappraised: Testing the theory and the therapy. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Ouimette, P. C., & Klein, D. N. (1993). Convergence of psychoanalytic and cognitive–behavioral theories of depression: An empirical review and new data on Blatt's and Beck's models. In Masling, J., & Bornstein, R. F. (Eds.), Psychoanalytic perspectives on psychopathology (pp. 191–224). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rosenthal, R., Rosnow, R. L., & Rubin, D. B. (2000). Contrasts and effect sizes in behavioral research: A correlational approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- StatSoft (1994). Statistica for the Macintosh. Tulsa, OK: Author.Google Scholar