Journal of Consumer Policy

, Volume 36, Issue 3, pp 315–328 | Cite as

Unfair Consumer Contract Terms Under Macedonian Law: How the Old and the New Function in Practice

  • Nenad Gavrilovic
Original Paper


This article analyses the functioning in practice of the system of substantive regulation of unfair terms in consumer contracts, introduced into Macedonian law as part of the harmonization obligations of the EU accession process. Specifically, the article seeks to establish the possible reasons for the absence of substantial evidence of application of the rules on unfair contract terms in consumer contracts in Macedonian practice. In providing an explanation, the focus is on the transposition of the consumer acquis and the Unfair Contract Terms Directive into national law, the enforcement structure for consumer law, and the relationship with the pre-existing civil law. In sum, the inconsistencies and incompleteness of the transposition, the weak and complex enforcement structure, as well as the unsettled relationship with the already existing civil law rules on similar topics have all contributed to weaken the practical significance of the special law on unfair contract terms.


General contract law Nullity Special consumer regime Unfair terms 



The author wishes to thank Yane Svetiev for his useful comments on an earlier version of this article and also for the help in the English editing of the text.


  1. Дабовиќ-Анастасовска, Ј., Лончар-Велкова, М., & Гавриловиќ, Н. (2010). Заштита на потрошувачите во договорните односи во правото на Република Македонија [Protection of consumers in contractual relations in Macedonian law]. Зборник на Правниот факултет „Јустинијан Први“ во чест на Владимир Митков, 351–374.Google Scholar
  2. Hondius, E. (1995). The reception of the directive on unfair terms in consumer contracts by member states. European Review of Private Law, 3, 241–255.Google Scholar
  3. Hondius, E. (2004). The protection of the weak party in a harmonised European contract law: A synthesis. Journal of Consumer Policy, 27, 245–251.Google Scholar
  4. Howells, G., & Reich, N. (2011). The current limits of European harmonisation in consumer contract law. ERA-Forum, 12, 39–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Loncar-Velkova, M. et al. (2012). “Consumer friendly” energy bills. Available from: Accessed 20 February 2013.
  6. Micklitz, H.-W. (2010). Reforming European unfair terms legislation in consumer contracts. European Review of Contract Law, 4, 347–383.Google Scholar
  7. Micklitz, H.-W. (2012). The expulsion of the concept of protection from the consumer law and the return of social elements in the civil law: a bittersweet polemic. Journal of Consumer Policy, 35, 283–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Micklitz, H.-W., & Radeideh, M. (2005). CLAB Europa—The European database on unfair terms in consumer contracts. Journal of Consumer Policy, 28, 325–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Schulte-Nölke, H., Twigg-Flesner, C., & Ebers, M. (Eds.). (2008). EC consumer law compendium: the consumer acquis and its transposition in the member states. Munich: Sellier.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Law “Iustinianus Primus”, boulSkopjeRepublic of Macedonia

Personalised recommendations