Advertisement

Journal of Consumer Policy

, Volume 30, Issue 4, pp 405–419 | Cite as

The Euro Changeover and the Factors Influencing Perceived Inflation

  • Helmut Jungermann
  • Hans Wolfgang Brachinger
  • Julia Belting
  • Katarzyna Grinberg
  • Elisabeth Zacharias
Original Paper

Abstract

The most flamboyant economic effect of the euro changeover on consumers was a dramatic increase in perceived inflation. To directly measure perceived inflation, Brachinger developed a new index of perceived inflation (IPI). This index is based on some hypotheses about factors influencing perceived inflation. An experimental study is presented which investigated the influence of two of these hypothesized factors, purchase frequency and loss aversion, on individual judgments of price changes. Furthermore, two additional factors have been included that are informative with respect to the IPI, product segment and price level. Judgments of inflation were assessed with three methods, yielding different results. Empirical evidence for the hypotheses was obtained.

Keywords

Perceived inflation Index of perceived inflation (IPI) Loss aversion Purchase frequency 

JEL classification

C43 E31 D81 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr. Gisela Kröger of the Statistical State Office Berlin for her valuable support.

References

  1. Bechtold, S., Elbel, G., & Hannappel, H.-P. (2005). Messung der wahrgenommenen Inflation in Deutschland: Die Ermittlung der Kaufhäufigkeiten durch das Statistische Bundesamt. Wirtschaft und Statistik, 9, 989–998.Google Scholar
  2. Brachinger, H. W. (2005). Der Euro als Teuro? Die wahrgenommene Inflation in Deutschland. Wirtschaft und Statistik, 9, 999–1013.Google Scholar
  3. Brachinger, H. W. (2006). Euro or “teuro”? The euro-induced perceived inflation in Germany. Working Paper 5, Department of Quantitative Economics, University of Fribourg Switzerland. URL http://ideas.repec.org/p/fri/dqewps/wp0005.html.
  4. Brachinger, H. W. (2007). Euro or “teuro”? Perceived inflation in Germany from 1996 to 2005. Journal of Economic Psychology (in press).Google Scholar
  5. Camerer, C. F. (2004). Prospect theory in the wild: Evidence from the field. In C. F. Camerer, G. Loewenstein, & M. Rabin (Eds.), Advances in Behavorial Economics (pp. 148–161). New York: Russel Sage Foundation, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Camerer, C. F., Babcock, L., Loewenstein, G., & Thaler, R. H. (2004). Labor supply of New York City cab drivers: One day at a time. In C. F. Camerer, G. Loewenstein, & M. Rabin (Eds.), Advances in Behavorial Economics (pp. 533–547). New York: Russel Sage Foundation, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  7. EC (2003). The joint harmonized EU programme of business and consumer surveys: User Guide. Brussels: European Commission. URL http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/indicators/business_consumer_ surveys/userguide_en.pdf.
  8. EC. (2006). The eurozone, 5 years after the introduction of euro coins and banknotes. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  9. Hardie, B., Johnson, E. J., & Fader, P. S. (1993). Modeling loss aversion and reference dependence effects on brand choice. Marketing Science, 12, 378–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hoffmann, J., Leifer, H.-A., & Lorenz, A. (2006). Index of perceived inflation or EU consumer surveys. Intereconomics, 41, 142–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kahneman, D. (2003). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. American Economic Review, 93, 162–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1991). Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, 1039–1061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Zacharias, E. (2006). Wahrgenommene Inflation – Versuche zur empirischen Erfassung. Diplomarbeit, Institut für Psychologie und Arbeitswissenschaft, Technische Universität Berlin.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Helmut Jungermann
    • 1
  • Hans Wolfgang Brachinger
    • 2
  • Julia Belting
    • 1
  • Katarzyna Grinberg
    • 2
  • Elisabeth Zacharias
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Psychology and ErgonomicsTechnical University of BerlinBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Department of Quantitative EconomicsUniversity of FribourgFribourgSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations