Journal of Consumer Policy

, Volume 29, Issue 2, pp 203–228 | Cite as

If we label it, will they care? The effect of GM-ingredient labelling on consumer responses

Original Paper


More than 60% of foods in North American supermarkets contain GM ingredients. While North American consumers seem less concerned about GM foods than Europeans and Japanese, many consumer activists argue that consumers have a “right to know” if what they eat has GM ingredients. Will informative labelling of GM foods lead to major shifts in buying patterns? An experimental study found minimal effects of GM labelling overall but significant differential reactions to GM-labelled products across consumers with differing levels of consumer activism, perceived benefits of genetic engineering, and interest in novel foods with consumer benefits.


Genetically modified foods Labelling Consumer choice Biotechnology acceptance 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aldrich, L. (1999). Consumer use of information: Implications for food policy. Washington, D.C.: US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. Agricultural Handbook No. 715.Google Scholar
  2. Dwyer, G. (1999). Frankenstein foods. Globe and Mail, February 20, D1. Google Scholar
  3. Einsiedel, E. F. (1998). The market for credible information in biotechnology. Journal of Consumer Policy, 21, 405–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Finlay, K., Morris, S., Londerville, J., & Watts, T. (1999). The impact of information and trust on consumer perceptions of biotechnology. Canadian Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 15–30.Google Scholar
  5. Frewer, L. J., Howard, C., Hedderley, D., & Shepherd, R. (1997). Consumer attitudes towards different food-processing technologies used in cheese production—the influence of consumer benefit. Food Quality and Preference, 8, 271–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Frewer, L. J., Howard, C., & Shepherd, R. (1994). Public concerns in the United Kingdom about general and specific applications of genetic engineering: Risk, benefit, and ethics. Science, Technology and Human Values, 22, 98–124.Google Scholar
  7. Golan, E., Kuchler, R., Mitchell, L., Greene, C., & Jessup, A. (2001). Economics of food labeling. Journal of Consumer Policy, 24, 117–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hadfield, G. K., & Thomson, D. (1998). An information-based approach to labelling biotechnology consumer products. Journal of Consumer Policy, 21, 551–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hamstra, A. M. (1991). Biotechnology in foodstuffs—towards a model of consumer acceptance. The Hague: The SWOKA Institute.Google Scholar
  10. Hamstra, A. M. (1995). Consumer acceptance model for food biotechnology—final report. The Hague: The SWOKA Institute.Google Scholar
  11. Hoban, T. J., & Kendall, P. A. (1992). Consumer attitudes about the use of biotechnology in agriculture and food production. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University.Google Scholar
  12. Hobbs, J. E., & Plunkett, M. D. (1999). Genetically modified foods: Consumer issues and the role of information asymmetry. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 47, 445–455. Google Scholar
  13. Honkanen, P., & Verplanken, B. (2004). Understanding attitudes towards genetically modified food: The role of values and attitude strength. Journal of Consumer Policy, 27, 401–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ippolito, P., & Mathios, A. D. (1990). Information, advertising and health choices: A study of the cereal market. Rand Journal of Economics, 21, 459–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kenny, M. (1999). Canadian Food Inspection Agency. Presentation on “Consumer Health and Safety, Consumer Information” to the Citizens’ Conference on Food Biotechnology, University of Calgary, Canada, March 5. Google Scholar
  16. Knight, J., Mather, D., & Holdsworth, D. (2005). Consumer benefits and acceptance of genetically modified food. Journal of Public Affairs, 5, 226–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. LeClair, C. (2000). Building public confidence through consumer information, informed choice, and multi-stakeholder involvement. Presentation at the Biotechnology and the Marketplace Conference. Ottawa: Industry Canada.Google Scholar
  18. McKenna, R. (1997). Real time: Preparing for the age of the never satisfied customer. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Muller, T. E. (1985). Structural information factors which stimulate the use of nutrition information: Field experiment. Journal of Marketing Research, 22, 143–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nolan, C. A. (1983). An evaluation of a point of purchase Nutrition Education Program. Unpublished master’s thesis. Seattle, WA: University of Washington.Google Scholar
  21. Noussair, C., Robin, S., & Ruffieux, B. (2002). Do consumers not care about biotech foods or do they just not read the labels? Economics Letters, 75, 47–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Peattie, K. (1995). Environmental marketing management: Meeting the green challenge. London: Pitman Publishing.Google Scholar
  23. Pew Institute on Food and Biotechnology (2004). Overview of findings 2004 Focus Groups & Poll. update/overview.pdf. (Oct. 30, 2004). Google Scholar
  24. Russo, E. J., Staelin, R., Russell, G. J., & Metcalf, B. (1986). Nutrition information in the supermarket. Journal of Consumer Research, 13, 48–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sheehy, H., Legault, M., & Ireland, D. (1998). Consumers and biotechnology: A synopsis of survey and focus group research. Journal of Consumer Policy, 21, 359–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sparks, P., Shepherd, R., & Frewer, L. J. (1994). Gene technology, food production, and public opinion: A UK study. Agriculture and Human Values, 11, 19–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Thøgersen, J. (2000). Psychological determinants of paying attention to eco-labels in purchase decision: Model development and multinational validation. Journal of Consumer Policy, 23, 285–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Toke, D. (2004). The politics of GM food: A comparative study of the UK, USA and EU. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Wohl, J. (1998). Consumers’ decision-making and risk perceptions regarding foods produced with biotechnology. Journal of Consumer Policy, 21, 387–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sprott School of BusinessCarleton UniversityOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations