Advertisement

Constitutional Political Economy

, Volume 26, Issue 2, pp 159–170 | Cite as

Strategic and expressive voting

  • Brad R. Taylor
Original Paper

Abstract

Critics of the expressive account of voting have argued that it is inconsistent with strategic voting. Since there is strong evidence that people vote strategically, this has been taken to show that many voters are at least partially instrumentally motivated. This paper argues that strategic voting in the relevant sense is consistent with entirely expressive political motivation. Building on an earlier suggestion by Geoffrey Brennan, I model voters as expressively valuing ideological position as well as the strategic pursuit of expressively-defined preferences. This model predicts strategic voting without instrumental preferences entering the voter’s calculus at all. I also suggest that expressive preferences for strategic behaviour can be usefully analysed in terms of dispositional choice.

Keywords

Expressive voting Strategic voting Political dispositions Revisionist public choice theory 

JEL Classification

B59 D70 H10 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I thank Geoff Brennan, Keith Dowding, the editors, and two anonymous referees.

References

  1. Aumann, R. J. (1976). Agreeing to disagree. The Annals of Statistics, 1236–1239.Google Scholar
  2. Blais, A. (2006). What affects voter turnout? Annual Review of Political Science, 9, 111–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brennan, G. (2001). Five rational actor accounts of the welfare state. Kyklos, 54(2–3), 213–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brennan, G. (2008). Psychological dimensions in voter choice. Public Choice, 137(3–4), 475–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brennan, G., & Hamlin, A. (1995). Economizing on virtue. Constitutional Political Economy, 6(1), 35–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brennan, G., & Hamlin, A. (1998). Expressive voting and electoral equilibrium. Public Choice, 95(1), 149–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brennan, G., & Hamlin, A. (2000). Democratic devices and desires. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brennan, G., & Hamlin, A. (2008). Revisionist public choice theory. New Political Economy, 13(1), 77–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brennan, G., & Lomasky, L. E. (1984). Inefficient unanimity. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 1(1), 151–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brennan, G., & Lomasky, L. E. (1985). The impartial spectator goes to Washington: Toward a Smithian theory of electoral behavior. Economics and Philosophy, 1(2), 189–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brennan, G., & Lomasky, L. E. (1989). Large numbers, small costs: The uneasy foundation of democratic rule. In G. Brennan & L. E. Lomasky (Eds.), Politics and process: New essays in democratic thought (pp. 42–59). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brennan, G., & Lomasky, L. E. (1993). Democracy and decision: The pure theory of electoral preference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Buchanan, J. M. (1984). Politics without romance: A sketch of positive public choice theory and its normative implications. In J. M. Buchanan & R. D. Tollison (Eds.), The theory of public choice II (pp. 11–22). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  14. Caplan, B. (2002). Systematically biased beliefs about economics: Robust evidence of judgemental anomalies from the survey of Americans and economists on the economy. Economic Journal, 112(479), 433–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Caplan, B. (2007). The myth of the rational voter. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Carter, J. R., & Guerette, S. D. (1992). An experimental study of expressive voting. Public Choice, 73(3), 251–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Christiano, T. (2004). Is normative rational choice theory self-defeating? Ethics, 115(1), 122–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cowen, T., & Hanson, R. (2004). Are disagreements honest? Unpublished manuscript, George Mason University.Google Scholar
  19. Cox, G. W. (1997). Making votes count: Strategic coordination in the world’s electoral systems. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dowding, K. (2005). Is it rational to vote? Five types of answer and a suggestion. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 7(3), 442–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  22. Edlin, A., Gelman, A., & Kaplan, N. (2007). Voting as a rational choice why and how people vote to improve the well-being of others. Rationality and Society, 19(3), 293–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Feddersen, T., Gailmard, S., & Sandroni, A. (2009). Moral bias in large elections: Theory and experimental evidence. American Political Science Review, 103(02), 175–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fischer, A. J. (1996). A further experimental study of expressive voting. Public Choice, 88(1), 171–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fowler, J. H., & Smirnov, O. (2007). Mandates, parties, and voters: How elections shape the future. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Glazer, A. (2008). Voting to anger and to please others. Public Choice, 134(3), 247–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Goodin, R. E., & Roberts, K. W. (1975). The ethical voter. The American Political Science Review, 69(3), 926–928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hamlin, A. (2006). Political dispositions and dispositional politics. In G. Eusepi & A. Hamlin (Eds.), Beyond conventional economics: The limits of rational behaviour in political decision making (pp. 3–16). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  29. Hamlin, A., & Jennings, C. (2011). Expressive political behaviour: Foundations, scope and implications. British Journal of Political Science, 41(3), 645–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hanson, R. (2006). Uncommon priors require origin disputes. Theory and Decision, 61(4), 319–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hillman, A. (2010). Expressive behavior in economics and politics. European Journal of Political Economy, 26(4), 403–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Iyengar, S., & Hahn, K. S. (2009). Red media, blue media: Evidence of ideological selectivity in media use. Journal of Communication, 59(1), 19–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Iyengar, S., Norpoth, H., & Hahn, K. S. (2004). Consumer demand for election news: The horserace sells. Journal of Politics, 66(1), 157–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kamenica, E., & Egan Brad, L. (2014). Voters, dictators, and peons: Expressive voting and pivotality. Public Choice, 159(1–2), 159–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mackie, G. (2010). Why it’s rational to vote. Unpublished manuscript, San Diego: University of California.Google Scholar
  36. Mackie, G. (2011). An examination of the expressive theory of voting. Unpublished manuscript, San Diego: University of California.Google Scholar
  37. Mackie, G. (2012). Rational ignorance and beyond. In H. Landemore & J. Elster (Eds.), Collective wisdom: Principles and mechanisms (pp. 290–318). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Riker, W. H. (1982). Liberalism against populism: A confrontation between the theory of democracy and the theory of social choice. San Francisco: WH Freeman.Google Scholar
  39. Schuessler, A. A. (2000). A logic of expressive choice. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Shayo, M., & Harel, A. (2012). Non-consequentialist voting. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 81(1), 299–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sobel, R. S., & Wagner, G. A. (2004). Expressive voting and government redistribution: Testing Tullock’s ‘charity of the uncharitable’. Public Choice, 119(1), 143–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Stigler, G. J. (1972). Economic competition and political competition. Public Choice, 13(1), 91–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Taber, C. S., Lodge, M., & Glathar, J. (2001). The motivated construction of political judgments. In J. H. Kuklinski (Ed.), Citizens and politics: Perspectives from political psychology (pp. 198–226). London: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tullock, G. (1967). Toward a mathematics of politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  46. Tullock, G. (1971). The charity of the uncharitable. Western Economic Journal, 9(4), 379–392.Google Scholar
  47. Tyran, J. R. (2004). Voting when money and morals conflict: An experimental test of expressive voting. Journal of Public Economics, 88(7), 1645–1664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Politics and International RelationsThe Australian National UniversityActonAustralia

Personalised recommendations