Advertisement

Constitutional Political Economy

, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp 50–79 | Cite as

An index of political support for decentralization: the Spanish case

  • Juan Carlos Molero
  • Isabel Rodríguez-Tejedo
Original Paper
  • 104 Downloads

Abstract

This paper presents a method to make measurable what was not: the discourses of politicians regarding decentralization. For this purpose, we develop a “matrix of arguments” and a set of indexes, and apply them to provide a snapshot of the politicians’ views on the “General Law of Budgetary Stability”, a landmark for the process of decentralization in Spain.

Keywords

Political party Matrix of decentralization Arguments Index of decentralization 

JEL Classification

H30 H77 

References

  1. Bayoumi, T., & Eichengreen, B. (1995). Restraining yourself: The implications of fiscal rules for economics stabilization. IMF staff papers, 42, 32–48.Google Scholar
  2. Bel, G. (2003). Confidence building and politics in privatization: Some evidence from Spain. Economic Letters, 78(1), 9–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bel, G., & Costas, A. (2001). La privatización y sus motivaciones en España: de instrumento a política. Revista de Historia Industrial, 19–20, 105–132.Google Scholar
  4. Bhushan, V., & Paneth, N. (1991). The reliability of neonatal head circumference measurement. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 44(10), 1027–1035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bird, R. M., & Vaillancourt, F. (2000). Fiscal decentralization in developing countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Boadway, R. W., & Shah, A. (1995). Fundamentos económicos de los acuerdos fiscales intergubernamentales. In J. Romano Velasco (Ed.), La financiación de las Comunidades Autónomas. Análisis y orientación desde el federalismo fiscal (pp. 95–129). Salamanca: Servicio de Estudios de la Conserjería de Economía y Hacienda, Junta de Castilla y León.Google Scholar
  7. Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales. (2001). Several documents from the Congress and the Senate-plenary sessions, commissions, etc. Madrid: Congreso de los Diputados.Google Scholar
  8. Braña Pino, F. J., & Serna de los Mozos, V. M. (1999). La descentralización de las competencias de gasto público. Un análisis del caso español, 1979–1994. Hacienda Pública Española, 148, 75–96.Google Scholar
  9. Carletta, J. C., Isard, A., Isard, S., Kowtko, J., Doherty-Sneddon, G., & Anderson, A. (1997). The reliability of a dialogue structure coding scheme. Computational Linguistics, 23(1), 13–31.Google Scholar
  10. De Jonge, J. M., Schippers, G. M., & Schaap, Cas. P. D. R. (2005). The motivational interviewing skill code: Reliability and a critical appraisal. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychoterapy, 33, 285–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eichengreen, B., & Von Hangen, J. (1996). Fiscal policy and monetary union: Is there a tradeoff between federalism and budgetary restrictions? NBER Working paper series 5517.Google Scholar
  12. Fossati, A., & Panella, G. (1999). Fiscal federalism in the European Union. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Gil-Ruiz Gil-Esparza, C. L., & Iglesias Quintana, J. (2007). El gasto publico en España en un contexto descentralizado. Presupuesto y Gasto Público, 47, 185–206.Google Scholar
  14. González-Páramo, J. M. (2001). Costes y beneficios de la disciplina fiscal: la Ley de Estabilidad Presupuestaria en perspectiva. Madrid: Instituto de Estudios Fiscales.Google Scholar
  15. Krippendorff, K. (1970). Bivariate agreement coefficients for reliability of data. Sociological Methodology, 2, 139–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content analysis, an introduction to its methodology. Beverly Hill: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Krippendorff, K. (2004). Measuring the reliability of qualitative text analysis data. Quality & Quantity, 38, 787–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Linder, W., & Vatter, A. (2001). Institutions and outcomes of Swiss federalism: The role of the cantons in Swiss politics. West European Politics, 24(2), 95–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Melguizo Sánchez, A. (1989). Federalismo Fiscal. Una «guía de lectura» para un programa de investigación actual. Monograph n. 74. Madrid: Instituto de Estudios Fiscales.Google Scholar
  20. Molero, J. C. (2001). Analysis of the decentralization of public spending in Spain. Public Finance and Management I, 4, 500–556.Google Scholar
  21. Molero, J. C. (2002). Gasto público y federalismo fiscal en España. Período 1984–1998. Madrid: Consejo Económico y Social.Google Scholar
  22. Molero, J. C. (2003). La posición de los distintos partidos políticos respecto a la nueva Ley General de Estabilidad Presupuestaria: su influjo en los niveles subcentrales de gobierno. Presupuesto y Gasto Público, 32, 13–27.Google Scholar
  23. Musgrave, R. A. (1959). The theory of public finance. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  24. Oates, W. E. (1972). Fiscal federalism. New York: Harcourt Brace Javanovich.Google Scholar
  25. Oates, W. E. (1999). An essay on fiscal federalism. Journal of Economic Literature, XXXVII, 1120–1149.Google Scholar
  26. Obinger, H. (1998). Federalism, direct democracy, and welfare state development. Journal of Public Policy, 18(3), 241–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Olson, M. Jr. (1969). The principle of«fiscal equivalence»: The division of responsibilities among different levels of government. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 59, 479–503.Google Scholar
  28. Paneth, N., Qiu, H., Rosenbaum, P., Saigal, S., Bishai, S., Jetton, J., et al. (2003). Reliability of classification of cerebral palsy in low-birthweight children in four countries. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 45(9), 628–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pujol, F. (1998). La politique budgétaire du canton de Genève 1970 à 1995. Un divorce inévitable entre le discours politique et l’évolution des finances públiques? Revue Economique et Sociale, 56(3), 157–187.Google Scholar
  30. Pujol, F. (2009). Measuring US Presidents political commitment for fiscal discipline between 1920 and 2008. In L. Imbeau (Ed.) Do they walk like they talk? Speech and action in policy processes (Vol. 14). New York: Springer, Public Choice Series, Forthcoming. http://www.springer.com/social+sciences/political+science/book/978-0-387-89671-7.
  31. Steiner, J., Bächtiger, A., Spörndli, M., & Steenbergen, M. (2003). Measuring political deliberation: A discourse quality index. Comparative European Politics, 1(1), 21–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Steiner, J., Bächtiger, A., Spörndli, M., & Steenbergen, M. (2004). Deliberative politics in action: Analyzing parliamentary discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Stewart, K. (2000). Fiscal federalism in Russia. UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  34. Suárez-Pandiello, J. (1999). Fiscal federalism in Spain. Decentralization: An unfinished task. In A. Fossati & G. Panella (Eds.), Fiscal federalism in the European Union (pp. 222–254). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Tiebout, Ch.M. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditure. Journal of Political Economy 64. Spanish version in: Hacienda Pública Española 35: 394–405.Google Scholar
  36. Trochim, W., & Donnelly, J. P. (2007). The research methods knowledge base. Mason: Atomic Dog Publishing.Google Scholar
  37. Vatter, A. (2000). Consensus and direct democracy: Conceptual and empirical linkages. European Journal of Political Research, 38(2), 171–192.Google Scholar
  38. Vatter, A., & Freitag, M. (2007). The contradictory effects of consensus democracy on the size of government: Evidence from the Swiss cantons. British Journal of Political Science, 37, 359–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wildasin, D. (1997). Fiscal aspects of evolving federations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversidad de NavarraPamplonaSpain

Personalised recommendations