Advertisement

Constitutional Political Economy

, Volume 19, Issue 4, pp 361–367 | Cite as

Margaret Schabas: The Natural Origins of Economics

University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2005, 231 pp, $40.00
  • David M. Levy
Book Review
  • 96 Downloads

When F. A. Hayek, John Rawls and James Buchanan, all in their own ways, revitalized constitutional political economy, they explicitly returned to an eighteenth century vantage in opposition to late nineteenth and twentieth century utilitarian approaches. Hayek posed the problem of problem of spontaneous order in opposition to deliberate planning. Rawls posed the problem of political philosophy as one in of agreement among equals rather than the allocation by an altruistic expert. Buchanan posed the problem of political economy as one with two equals trading rather than an isolated individual optimizing. Supposing for the sake of the argument that Hayek–Rawls–Buchanan are all onto something, what went wrong? Why was it necessary to discard so much post-eighteenth century thinking?

Margaret Schabas’s The Natural Origins of Economicsconfronts the question of what went wrong in economics and gives the answer that economic processes were removed from the “natural” to becoming something...

References

  1. Cot, A. L. (2005). ‘Breed Out the Unfit and Breed in the Fit’: Irving Fisher, Economics and the Science of Heredity. The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 64, 793–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Darwin, C. [1859] (1964). On the origin of species by natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Darwin, C. [1871] (1989). The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. In P. H. Barrett & R. B. Freeman (Eds.), Volumes 21–2 of the works of Charles Darwin. Washington Square, New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Edgeworth, F. Y. (1881). Mathematical psychics. London: C. Kegan Paul & Co.Google Scholar
  5. Huzel, J. P. (2006). The popularization of Malthus in early nineteenth century England. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  6. Keynes, J. M. (1944). Letter to F. A. Hayek. London School of Economics, COLL MISC 0600.Google Scholar
  7. Leonard, T. C. (2005). Protecting family and race: The progressive case for regulating women’s work. The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 64, 757–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Levy, D. M., & Peart, S. J. (2006). Charles Kingsley and the theological interpretation of Natural Selection. Journal of Bioeconomics, 8, 197–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Levy, D. M., & Peart, S. J. (2008). The place of factions. In Y. Jeffrey (Ed.), Elgar companion to Adam Smith. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  10. Marshall, A. (1890). Principles of economics. http://www.econlib.org/library/Marshall/marP.html.
  11. Moore, J., & Desmond, A. (2004). “Introduction” in C. Darwin. In The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  12. Peart, S. J. (2007). Review of the natural order of economics. History of Economic Ideas, 15, 173–175.Google Scholar
  13. Peart, S. J., & Levy, D. M. (2005). The “Vanity of the Philosopher”: From equality to hierarchy in post-classical economics. Ann Arbor: Michigan.Google Scholar
  14. Peart, S. J., & Levy, D. M. (2006). Ethics, approbation and the election of leaders. Chicago: International Leadership Association.Google Scholar
  15. Peart, S. J., & Levy, D. M. (2008a). Darwin’s unpublished letter at the Bradlaugh-Besant Trial: A question of divided expert judgment. European Journal of Political Economy, 24, 343–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Peart, S. J., & Levy, D. M. (2008b). Discussion, construction and evolution: Mill, Buchanan and Hayek on the constitutional order. Constitutional Political Economy, 19, 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Wallace, A. R. (1864). The origin of human races and the antiquity of man deduced from the theory of ‘Natural Selection’. Journal of the Anthropological Society of London, 2, clviii–clxxxvii.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsGeorge Mason UniversityFairfaxUSA

Personalised recommendations