Computational Mathematics and Modeling

, Volume 17, Issue 4, pp 341–353 | Cite as

Applying the dual operator formalism to derive the zeroth-order boundary function of the plasma-sheath equation

  • D. S. Filippychev


The article constructs the asymptotic solution of the Tonks-Langmuir integro-differential equation with an Emmert kernel, which describes the potential both in the bulk plasma and in a narrow boundary layer. Equations of this type are singularly perturbed, because the highest order (second) derivative is multiplied by a small coefficient. The asymptotic solution is obtained by the boundary function method. The second-order differential equation describing the behavior of the zeroth-order boundary function is investigated using the dual operator formalism — an analog of the conjugate operator in the linear theory. The application of this formalism has produced an asymptotic solution and has also made it possible to propose a number of homogeneous discrete three-point schemes for solving the equation.


Asymptotic Solution Asymptotic Expression Dual Operator Conjugate Operator Singular Perturbation Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    L. Tonks and I. Langmuir, “A general theory of the plasma of an arc,” Phys. Rev., 34, No. 6, 876–922 (1929).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    G. A. Emmert, R. M. Wieland, A. T. Mense, and J. N. Davidson, “Electric sheath and presheath in a collisionless, finite ion temperature plasma,” Phys. Fluids, 23, No. 4, 802–812 (1980).MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    D. S. Filippychev, “Boundary function method for asymptotic solution of the plasma-sheath equation,” in: Prikladnaya Matematika Informatika, No. 19, Moscow, MAKS Press (2004), pp. 21–40.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. B. Vasil’eva and V. F. Butuzov, Asymptotic Expansion of Solutions of Singularly Perturbed Equations [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1973).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. B. Vasil’eva and V. F. Butuzov, Singularly Perturbed Equations in Critical Cases [in Russian], Izd. MGU, Moscow (1978).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. B. Vasil’eva and V. F. Butuzov, Asymptotic Methods in Singular Perturbation Theory [in Russian], Vysshaya Shkola, Moscow (1990).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    D. G. Cacuci, R. B. Perez, and V. Protopopescu, “Duals and propagators: A canonical formalism for nonlinear equations,” J. Math. Phys., 29, No. 2, 335–361 (1988).MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    D. G. Cacuci and O. A. Karakashian, “Benchmarking the propagator method for nonlinear systems: A Burgers-Korteweg-de Vries equation,” J. Comput. Phys., 89, No. 1, 63–79 (1990).MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    E. T. Whittaker and G. N. Watson, A Course of Modern Analysis, 4th ed., Cambridge Univ. (1927).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    D. S. Filippychev, “Simulation of the plasma-sheath equation on a condensing grid,” in: Prikladnaya Matematika Informatika, No. 14, MAKS Press, Moscow (2003), pp. 35–54.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. S. Filippychev

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations