Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Three Stage Model for Mental Health Treatment Court: A Qualitative Analysis of Graduates’ Perspectives

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Community Mental Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mental Health Treatment Courts (MHTC) address the overrepresentation of individuals with mental health disorders in the criminal justice system and strive to minimize the "revolving door" cycle of arrest/incarceration/release/re-arrest. A qualitative research group interview design was conducted with program graduates resulting in a three stage model. Participant’s motivation was initially to avoid jail, but over time participants begin to make intentional choices leading to mental health recovery. Participants also described the importance of their relationship with the staff and the judge as well as the need for trust, understanding, and respect throughout the program. Recommendations for future research and program development are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anthony, W. A. (1993). Recovery from mental illness: The guiding vision of the mental health service system in the 1990s. Innovations & Research, 2, 17–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, W. A., Cohen, M. A., Farkas, M., & Gagne, C. (2002). Psychiatric Rehabilitation. Boston: The Center for Psychiatric Rehabilitation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bales, W. D., Nadel, M., Reed, C., & Blomberg, T. G. (2017). Recidivism and inmate mental illness. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 6, 40–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boothroyd, R. A., Mercado, C. C., Poythress, N. G., Christy, A., & Petrila, J. (2015). Clinical outcomes of defendants in mental health court. Psychiatric Services, 56(7), 829–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bullard, C. E., & Thrasher, R. (2016). Evaluating mental health court by impact on jurisdictional crime rates. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 27(3), 227–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, P. J., Hiday, V. A., & Ray, B. (2013). Effectiveness 2 years post exit of a recently established mental health court. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(2), 189–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cosden, M., Ellens, J. K., Schnell, J. L., & Yamini-Diouf, Y. (2005). Efficacy of a mental health treatment court with assertive community treatment. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 23(2), 199–214.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Council of State Government Justice Center. (2016). Mental Health Treatment Courts. Retrieved from https://www.csgjusticecenter.org/mental-health-court-project/.

  • Gagliardi, G. J., Lovell, D., Peterson, P. D., & Jemelka, R. (2004). Forecasting recidivism in mentally ill offenders released from prison. Law and Human Behavior, 28(2), 133–155.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hora, P., Schma, W., & Rosenthal, J. (1999). Therapeutic jurisprudence and the drug court movement: Revolutionizing the criminal justice system’s response to drug abuse and crime in America. Notre Dame Law Review, 74(2), 499.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, D. J., & Glaze, L. E. (2006). Bureau of Justice Statistics, Special Report: Mental health problems of prison and jail inmates. Retrieved from http://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=pbdetail&iid=5946.

  • Lurigio, A. J., & Snowden, J. (2009). Putting therapeutic jurisprudence into practice: The growth, operations, and effectiveness of a mental health court. Justice System Journal, 30(2), 196–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, S. M., DeHart, D. D., Belknap, J. E., Green, B. L., Dass-Brailsford, P., Johnson, K. A., et al. (2014). A multisite study of the prevalence of serious mental illness, PTSD and substance use disorders of women in jail. Psychiatric Services, 65(5), 670–674.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McNiel, D. E., & Binder, R. L. (2007). Effectiveness of a mental health court in reducing criminal recidivism and violence. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 164(9), 1395–1403.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McNiel, D. E., Sadeh, N., Delucchi, K. L., & Binder, R. L. (2015). Prospective study of violence risk reduction by a mental health court. Psychiatric Services, 66(6), 598.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M., & Hiday, V. (2006). Mental health court outcomes: A comparison of re-arrest and re-arrest severity between mental health court and traditional court participants. Law and Human Behavior, 30, 659–674.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Onken, S. H., Craig, C. M., Ridgway, P., Ralph, R. O., & Cook, J. A. (2007). An analysis of definitions and elements of recovery: A review of the literature. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 31(1), 9–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robst, J. (2017). Disposition of charges, out-of-home mental health treatment, and juvenile justice recidivism. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 61(11), 1195–1209.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sanford, J. S., & Arrigo, B. A. (2005). Lifting the cover on drug courts: Evaluation findings and policy concerns. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 49(3), 239–259.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith-Acuna, S. (2011). Systems theory in action: Applications to individual, couples, and family therapy. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snedker, K. A., Beach, L. R., & Corcoran, K. E. (2017). Beyond the ‘Revolving Door?” Incentives and criminal recidivism in a mental health court. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 44(9), 1141–1162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steadman, H. J., Osher, F. C., Robbins, P. C., Case, B., & Samuels, S. (2009). Prevalence of serious mental illness among jail inmates. Psychiatric Services, 60(6), 761–765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steadman, H. J., Redlich, A. D., Callahan, L., Robbins, P. C., & Vesselinov, R. (2011). Effect of mental health courts on arrests and jail days: A multisite study. Archives of General Psychiatry, 68(2), 167–172.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wexler, D., & Winick, B. (Eds.). (1996). Law in a therapeutic key: Developments in therapeutic jurisprudence. Durham: Carolina Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, N. (2002). Courts as therapeutic agents: Thinking past the novelty of mental health courts. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 30(3), 215–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yerushalmi, H., & Lysaker, P. H. (2014). The recovery approach to rehabilitation: Implementation in supervision. Journal of Social Work Practice, 28(1), 59–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Funding was provided by University of Scranton.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rebecca Spirito Dalgin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Lee Ann Eschbach, Rebecca Spirito Dalgin were funded to complete an evaluation of the program in this study in 2017. Elizabeth Pantucci has no conflicts of interest on this project.

Informed Consent

Full IRB approval was granted for this study and informed consent was obtained from all individual participants in this study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Eschbach, L.A., Dalgin, R.S. & Pantucci, E. A Three Stage Model for Mental Health Treatment Court: A Qualitative Analysis of Graduates’ Perspectives. Community Ment Health J 55, 590–598 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-018-0346-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-018-0346-5

Keywords

Navigation