Community Mental Health Journal

, Volume 53, Issue 5, pp 542–549 | Cite as

Peer Support in Full-Service Partnerships: A Multiple Case Study Analysis

Original Paper

Abstract

Peer providers are integral to Full Service Partnerships (FSPs), which are team-based mental health service models. Peer providers use principles of recovery to engage clients, but FSPs can vary in their recovery orientation. Whether and how peer recovery orientation reflects the organizational environments of FSPs is unclear. This qualitative study explored peer provider attitudes towards recovery within the organizational contexts of FSPs where they are employed. Case study analysis was conducted on eight purposively sampled FSPs using qualitative interviews with peer providers and program directors. In two cases, peer recovery attitudes diverged from those of their organizational context. In these cases, peer providers were champions for recovery, and used practice-based strategies to promote client autonomy despite working in settings with lower recovery orientation. Peer providers could be uniquely positioned to promote client autonomy in settings where organizational factors limit consumer choice.

Keywords

Full-Service Partnership Peer Support Recovery Case Study Analysis 

References

  1. Aarons, G. A. (2006). Transformational and transactional leadership: Association with attitudes toward evidence-based practice. Psychiatric Services, 57, 1162–1169. doi:10.1176/ps.2006.57.8.1162.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Aarons, G. A., & Sawitzky, A. C. (2006). Organizational culture and climate and mental health provider attitudes toward evidence-based practice. Psychological Services, 3, 61–72. doi:10.1037/1541-1559.3.1.61.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Clarke, G. N., Herinckx, H. A., Kinney, R. F., Paulson, R. I., Cutler, D. L., Lewis, K., & Oxman, E. (2000). Psychiatric hospitalizations, arrests, emergency room visits, and homelessness of clients with serious and persistent mental illness: Findings from a randomized trial of two ACT programs vs. usual care. Mental Health Services Research, 2, 155–164. doi:10.1023/A:1010141826867.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Davidson, L., Chinman, M., Sells, D., & Rowe, M. (2006). Peer support among adults with serious mental illness: A report from the field. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 32, 443–450. doi:10.1093/schbul/sbj043.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Davidson, L., & Roe, D. (2007). Recovery from versus recovery in serious mental illness: One strategy for lessening confusion plaguing recovery. Journal of Mental Health, 16(4), 459–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davidson, L., O’Connell, M. J., Tondora, J., Lawless, M., & Evans, A. C. (2005). Recovery in serious mental illness: A new wine or just a new bottle? Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 36, 480–487. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.36.5.480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fraser, D. (2000). QSR NVivo NUD*IST Vivo reference guide. Melbourne: QSR International.Google Scholar
  9. Gilmer, T. P., Katz, M. L., Stefancic, A., & Palinkas, L. A. (2013). Variation in the implementation of California’s full service partnerships for persons with serious mental illness. Health Services Research, 48, 2245–2267. doi:10.1111/1475-6773.12119.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Glisson, C., & James, L. R. (2002). The cross level effects of culture and climate in human service teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(6), 767–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. SAMHSA- HRSA Center for Integrated Health Solutions. (2016). Peer providers. Retrieved from, http://www.integration.samhsa.gov/workforce/peer-providers.
  12. Inciardi, J. A., & Harrison, L. D. (2000). Introduction: The concept of harm reduction. In J. A. Inciardi & L. D. Harrison (Eds.), Harm reduction: National and international perspectives (pp. vii–xix). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousnd Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Min, S.-Y., Whitecraft, J., Rothbard, A. B., & Salzer, M. S. (2007). Peer support for persons with co-occurring disorders and community tenure: A survival analysis. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 30, 207–213. doi:10.2975/30.3.2007.207.213.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Ostrow, L., & Adams, N. (2012). Recovery in the USA: From politics to peer support. International Review of Psychiatry, 24(1), 70–78.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Palinkas, L. A. Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., . Wisdom, J. P.,  Duan, N., & Hoagwood,  K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544.Google Scholar
  17. Patton, M. Q. (2005). Qualitative research. In Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral science. Hoboken: Wiley. doi:10.1002/0470013192.bsa514 .
  18. Ralph, R. O. (2000). Recovery. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Skills, 4, 480–517. doi:10.1080/10973430008408634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Repper, J., & Carter, T. (2011). A review of the literature on peer support in mental health services. Journal of Mental Health, 20, 392–411.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Salzer, M. S., Schwenk, E., & Brusilovskiy, E. (2010). Certified peer specialist roles and activities: Results from a national survey. Psychiatric Services, 61, 520–523. doi:10.1176/ps.2010.61.5.520.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Sells, D., Davidson, L., Jewell, C., Falzer, P., & Rowe, M. (2006). The treatment relationship in peer-based and regular case management for clients with severe mental illness. Psychiatric Services, 57, 1179–1184. doi:10.1176/ps.2006.57.8.1179.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Slade, M., Amering, M., Farkas, M., Hamilton, B., O’Hagan, M., Panther, G., & Whitley, R. (2014). Uses and abuses of recovery: implementing recovery—oriented practices in mental health systems. World Psychiatry, 13(1), 12–20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Sledge, W. H., Lawless, M., Sells, D., Wieland, M., O’Connell, M. J., & Davidson, L. (2011). Effectiveness of peer support in reducing readmissions of persons with multiple psychiatric hospitalizations. Psychiatric Services, 62, 541–544. doi:10.1176/ps.62.5.pss6205_0541.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Solomon, P. (2004). Peer support/peer provided services: Underlying processes, benefits, and critical ingredients. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 27, 392–401. doi:10.2975/27.2004.392.401.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 273–285). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  26. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2014). Recovery and recovery support. Retrieved from, http://www.samhsa.gov/recovery.
  27. Yin, R. (2003). Case study research: Design and method (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elizabeth Siantz
    • 1
  • Benjamin Henwood
    • 2
  • Todd Gilmer
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Family and Preventive MedicineUniversity of California, San DiegoLa JollaUSA
  2. 2.School of Social WorkUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations