Peer Support in Full-Service Partnerships: A Multiple Case Study Analysis
Peer providers are integral to Full Service Partnerships (FSPs), which are team-based mental health service models. Peer providers use principles of recovery to engage clients, but FSPs can vary in their recovery orientation. Whether and how peer recovery orientation reflects the organizational environments of FSPs is unclear. This qualitative study explored peer provider attitudes towards recovery within the organizational contexts of FSPs where they are employed. Case study analysis was conducted on eight purposively sampled FSPs using qualitative interviews with peer providers and program directors. In two cases, peer recovery attitudes diverged from those of their organizational context. In these cases, peer providers were champions for recovery, and used practice-based strategies to promote client autonomy despite working in settings with lower recovery orientation. Peer providers could be uniquely positioned to promote client autonomy in settings where organizational factors limit consumer choice.
KeywordsFull-Service Partnership Peer Support Recovery Case Study Analysis
This research was supported by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality [AHRQ1R01HS019986].
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Clarke, G. N., Herinckx, H. A., Kinney, R. F., Paulson, R. I., Cutler, D. L., Lewis, K., & Oxman, E. (2000). Psychiatric hospitalizations, arrests, emergency room visits, and homelessness of clients with serious and persistent mental illness: Findings from a randomized trial of two ACT programs vs. usual care. Mental Health Services Research, 2, 155–164. doi: 10.1023/A:1010141826867.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fraser, D. (2000). QSR NVivo NUD*IST Vivo reference guide. Melbourne: QSR International.Google Scholar
- SAMHSA- HRSA Center for Integrated Health Solutions. (2016). Peer providers. Retrieved from, http://www.integration.samhsa.gov/workforce/peer-providers.
- Inciardi, J. A., & Harrison, L. D. (2000). Introduction: The concept of harm reduction. In J. A. Inciardi & L. D. Harrison (Eds.), Harm reduction: National and international perspectives (pp. vii–xix). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousnd Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- Palinkas, L. A. Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., . Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544.Google Scholar
- Patton, M. Q. (2005). Qualitative research. In Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral science. Hoboken: Wiley. doi: 10.1002/0470013192.bsa514 .
- Sledge, W. H., Lawless, M., Sells, D., Wieland, M., O’Connell, M. J., & Davidson, L. (2011). Effectiveness of peer support in reducing readmissions of persons with multiple psychiatric hospitalizations. Psychiatric Services, 62, 541–544. doi: 10.1176/ps.62.5.pss6205_0541.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 273–285). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2014). Recovery and recovery support. Retrieved from, http://www.samhsa.gov/recovery.
- Yin, R. (2003). Case study research: Design and method (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar