Psychometric Properties of the Milestones of Recovery Scale-Older Adult Version
- 142 Downloads
The Milestones of Recovery Scale (MORS) is a tool that mental health professionals can use to track clients’ recovery. It has been shown to have good reliability and validity in an adult population. It is important to demonstrate its psychometric properties among the elderly. This study assessed the reliability and validity of the MORS among a multi-ethnic (52 % White) sample of adults 54 and older (M = 67) at several mental health agencies in California. The clients, N = 432, were assessed by two raters each at two time points 2 weeks apart. Ratings were obtained on the MORS, the modified Global Assessment of Functioning scale (mGAF), and the Multnomah Community Ability Scale (MCAS). The MORS demonstrated acceptable reliability: inter-rater r = .65 and test–retest r = .71; the mGAF was .56 and .79; the MCAS was .66 and .85. The validity of the MORS was also supported: mGAF–MORS r = .68 and MCAS–MORS r = .74. This study lends support for the use of the MORS in older adult populations. In addition, this is the first report of the psychometric properties of the MCAS with an entirely older adult sample.
KeywordsReliability Validity MCAS GAF Older adults Mental illness
This work was supported in part by Contract Number 07-38911 from Mental Health America of Los Angeles.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human and Animal Rights
The Institutional Review Board of the California State University, Long Beach approved the protocol and the informed consent form for this study.
- Dickerson, F. B., Origoni, A. E., Pater, A., Friedman, B. K., & Kordonski, W. M. (2003). An expanded version of the Multnomah Community Ability Scale: Anchors and interview probes for the assessment of adults with serious mental illness. Community Mental Health Journal, 39(2), 131–137.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Grootenboer, E. M., Giltay, E. J., van der Lem, R., van Veen, T., van der Wee, N. J., & Zitman, F. G. (2012). Reliability and validity of the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale in clinical outpatients with depressive disorders. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 18(2), 502–507. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01614.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Inc.Google Scholar
- Von Korff, M., Andrews, G., & Delves, M. (2011). Assessing activity limitations and disability among adults. In D. A. Regier, W. E. Narrow, E. A. Kuhl, & D. J. Kupfer (Eds.), The conceptual evolution of DSM-5 (Vol. xxix, pp. 163–188). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing Inc.Google Scholar
- Waltz, C. F., Strickland, O. L., & Lenz, E. R. (1991). Measurement in nursing research (2nd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis Company.Google Scholar