Peer Support Providers’ Role Experiences on Interprofessional Mental Health Care Teams: A Qualitative Study
- 1.1k Downloads
This study explores how peer support providers’ roles are defined and integrated in inter-professional mental health care teams, and how these providers relate to other practitioners and clients. Interviews were conducted with peer support providers in two different formal models of peer support employment. Qualitative data analysis was undertaken. The findings indicate that: peer support providers experience ambiguity and that some ambiguity may offer benefits; peer support providers enhance team acceptance of their role through several means and strategies; setting boundaries with clients is a delicate issue that requires several considerations that we discuss.
KeywordsPeer support Role Inter-professional teams Boundaries with clients
This study was funded by Telfer School of Management Research Funds (SMRF Supervision/Research) and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Besio, S. W., & Mahler, J. (1993). Benefits and challenges of using consumer staff in supported housing services. Hospital & Community Psychiatry, 44(5), 490–491.Google Scholar
- Campbell, J., & Leaver, J. (2003). Emerging new practices in organized peer support. National Technical Assistance Center for State Mental Health Planning and National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors.Google Scholar
- Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2011). Designing qualitative research (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Mead, S., & MacNeil, C. (2006). Peer support: What makes it unique? International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 10(2), 29–37.Google Scholar
- Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- MOHLTC (Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care). (2005). Ontario Program Standards for ACT Teams.Google Scholar
- Moll, S., Holmes, J., Geronimo, J., & Sherman, D. (2009). Work transitions for peer support providers in traditional mental health programs: Unique challenges and opportunities. IOS Press, 33, 449–458.Google Scholar
- O’Hagan, M., Cyr, C., McKee, H., & Priest, R. for the Mental Health Commission of Canada. (2010). Making the case for peer support: Report to the Peer Support Project Committee of the Mental Health Commission of Canada.Google Scholar
- Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar