Integrating Scale Data and Patient Perspectives for Assessing Functionality in Schizophrenia
There is a growing body of literature devoted to evaluating functionality when planning the psychosocial rehabilitation of patients with schizophrenia. Until recently, psychological scales have been the predominant source of information, whereas patients’ perceptions about the most disruptive limitations on their daily life were not considered. The aim of this paper is to illustrate how the integration of the perspectives of patients and patients’ relatives improves the evaluation of functionality. A QUAN + QUAL design was implemented collecting quantitative data from Family APGAR and BELS scales, and qualitative information by conducting focus groups. The integration of results made it possible to understand the causes of problems reported by scales, as well as improving the information captured for helping to plan patient therapies. This mixed approach has provided a more comprehensive perspective of functionality, which will be helpful in improving quality of life of patients and their relatives.
KeywordsMixed methods Functionality Schizophrenia Family APGAR BELS
The authors received financial support for the research and/or authorship of this article from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness under the Research Support Programme (Project No. PSI2012-32275), and from the Andalusia Regional Government under the Excellent Research Fund (SEJ-6569, SEJ-5188).
- American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
- American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic criteria from DSM-IV-TR. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Pub.Google Scholar
- Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Mauricio, J., Romero, N., Saa, H. A., Herrera, J. A., & Reyes-Ortiz, C. A. (2006). Prevalence of religiosity, family function, social support and depressive symptoms in old people. Revista Colombia Médica, 37(2 Sup. 1), 26–30.Google Scholar
- QSR International. (2012). NVivo qualitative data analysis software. Version 10.Google Scholar
- Robles, R., Medina, R., Páez, F., & Becerra, B. (2010). Evaluación de funcionalidad, discapacidad y salud para la rehabilitación psicosocial de pacientes aislados por trastornos mentales graves. Salud Mental, 33(1), 67–75.Google Scholar
- Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Velligan, D. I., Bow-Thomas, C., Mahurin, R., Miller, A. L., & Halgunseth, L. C. (2000). Do specific neurocognitive deficits predict specific domains of community function in schizophrenia? Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 188, 518–524. doi: 10.1097/00005053-200008000-00007.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wolnitzki, L., Vargas, N., Cerón, C., Errázuriz, G., Fabres, J., Morales, J. C., et al. (1989). Social net in support of adolescents scholars: Its appraisal by Smilkstein APGAR test. Boletín Hospital San Juan de Dios, 36(3), 147–155.Google Scholar
- World Health Organization. (2001). International classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar