Community Mental Health Journal

, Volume 50, Issue 5, pp 612–618 | Cite as

Factor Structure of the Internet Addiction Scale and Its Associations with Psychiatric Symptoms for Korean Adolescents

  • Minje Sung
  • Yun-Mi Shin
  • Sun-Mi Cho
Brief Report


In this paper, we explore underlying factors of Internet Addiction Scale (IAS) and examine how the dimensions of the IAS relate to psychiatric symptoms in Korean adolescents. Exploratory factor analysis with a sample of N = 1,722 consisted of 13–15 year old Korean adolescents identified three distinctive factors of IAS and they were labeled ‘time management’, ‘withdrawal behaviors’ and ‘neglect work’. Then, multiple regression models were applied to assess the association between each factor and eight psychological problems, which were evaluated by Youth Self Report. The overall IAS was significantly associated with Somatic, Immature, Thought, Attention, Delinquent and Aggressive behaviors. However, three factor scores showed different association patterns and indicated multidimensional aspects of problematic Internet use.


Internet addiction Korean adolescent Young’s Internet Addiction Scale 


  1. Achenbach, T. M. (1991a). Manual for the child behavior checklist/4-18 and 1991 profile. Burlington: Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont.Google Scholar
  2. Achenbach, T. M. (1991b). Manual for the youth self report and 1991 profile. Burlington: Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont.Google Scholar
  3. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bentler, P. M., & Bonnet, D. C. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bernner, V. (1997). Psychology of computer use: XLVII. Parameters of Internet use, abuse and addiction: The first 90 days of the Internet Usage Survey. Psychological Reports, 80, 879–882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cao, H., Sun, Y., Wan, Y., Hao, J., & Tao, F. (2011). Problematic internet use in chinese adolescents and its relation to psychosomatic symptoms and life satisfaction. BMC Public Health,. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-802.Google Scholar
  8. Caplan, S. E. (2002). Problematic Internet use and psychosocial well-being: Development of a theory-based cognitive-behavioral measurement instrument. Computers in Human Behavior, 18(5), 553–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carmins, E., & Mclver, J. (1981). Analyzing models with unobserved variables. In G. W. Bohrnestedt & E. F. Borgetta (Eds.), Social measurement: Current issues (pp. 65–115). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Chang, M. K., & Law, S. P. M. (2008). Factor structure for Young’s Internet Addiction Test: A confirmatory study. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(6), 2597–2619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chou, C. (2001). Internet heavy use and addiction among Taiwanese college students: An online interview study. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 4(5), 573–585.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Davis, R. A., Flett, G. L., & Besser, A. (2002). Validation of a new scale for measuring problematic internet use: Implications for pre-employment screening. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 5(4), 331–345.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Diamantopoulos, A., & Siguaw, J. A. (2000). Introducing LISREL. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Ferraro, G., Caci, B., D’Amico, A., & Blasi, M. D. (2006). Internet addiction disorder: An Italian study. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10, 170–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Goldberg, I. (1996) Internet addiction disorder. Retrieved November from
  17. Griffiths, M. D. (2000). Does internet and computer “addiction” exist? Some case study evidence. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 3(2), 211–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gyeong, H., Lee, H., & Lee, K. (2012). Factor analysis of the young’s internet addiction test: In Korean college students group. Journal of Korean Neuropsychiatry Association, 51, 45–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ha, J. H., Yoo, H. J., Cho, I. H., Chin, B., Shin, D., & Kim, J. H. (2006). Psychiatric comorbidity assessed in Korean children and adolescents who screen positive for internet addiction. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 67(5), 821–826.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R., & Black, W. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  21. Holden, C. (2010). Psychiatry. behavioral addictions debut in proposed DSM-V. Science, 327, 935.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jelenchick, L. A., Becker, T., & Moreno, M. A. (2012). Assessing the psychometric properties of the Internet Addiction Test (IAT) in US college students. Psychiatry Research, 196, 296–301.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Joreskog, K., & Sorbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International Inc.Google Scholar
  24. Kandell, J. J. (1998). Internet addiction on campus: The vulnerability of college students. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 1(1), 11–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Khazaal, Y., Billieux, J., Thorens, G., et al. (2008). French validation of the internet addiction test. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 11(6), 703–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Korea Internet and Security Agency. (2010). Survey on the internet usage. Seoul: KISA.Google Scholar
  27. Korekeila, J., Kaarlas, S., Jaaskelainen, M., Vahlberg, T., & Taiminen, T. (2010). Attached to the web-harmful use of the internet and its correlates. European Psychiatry, 25(4), 236–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukopadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox. A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well being? American Psychologist, 53, 1017–1031.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lavin, M. J., Yuen, C. N., Weinman, M., & Kozak, K. (2004). Internet dependence in the collegiate population: The role of shyness. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 7, 379–383.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lin, S. S. J., & Tsai, C. C. (2002). Sensation seeking and internet dependence of Taiwanese high school adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 18(4), 411–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Milani, L., Osualdella, D., & Di Blasio, P. (2009). Quality of interpersonal relationships and problematic internet use in adolescence. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 12(6), 681–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Morahan-Martin, J., & Schumacher, P. (2000). Incidence and correlates of pathological Internet use among college students. Computers in Human Behavior, 16(1), 13–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ngai, S. S. (2012). Exploring the validity of the internet addiction test for students in Grades 5–9 in Hong Kong. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 13, 221–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nunnally, J. C. (1967). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  35. Sheeks, M. S., & Birchmeier, Z. P. (2007). Shyness, sociability, and the use of computer mediated communication in relationship development. Cyberchology & Behavior, 10, 64–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shin, Y. M., Sung, M. J., Lim, K. Y., Park, K. S., & Cho, S. M. (2012). The pathway of internalizing and externalizing problems from childhood to adolescence: A prospective study from age 7 to 14–16 in Korea. Community Mental Health Journal, 48(3), 384–391.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tao, R., Huang, X. Q., Wang, J. N., Zhang, H. M., Zhang, Y., & Li, M. C. (2010). Proposed diagnostic criteria for internet addiction. Addiction, 105(3), 556–564.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tsai, C. C., & Lin, S. S. (2003). Internet addiction of adolescents in Taiwan: An interview study. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 6(6), 649–652.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Widyanto, L., & McMurran, M. (2004). The psychometric properties of the internet addiction test. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 7(4), 443–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Windyanto, L., Griffiths, M. D., & Brunsden, V. (2011). A psychometric comparison of the internet addiction test, the internet-related problem scale, and self-diagnosis. Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking, 14(3), 141–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yen, J. Y., Ko, C. H., Yen, C. F., Wu, H. Y., & Yang, M. J. (2007). The comorbid psychiatric symptoms of internet addiction: Attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), depression, social phobia, and hostility. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41(1), 93–98.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Yoo, H. J., Cho, S. C., Ha, J., Yune, S. K., et al. (2004). Attention deficit hyperactivity symptoms and internet addiction. Psychiatry Clinical Neuroscience, 58(5), 487–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Young, K. S. (1998a). Caught in the net: How to recognize the signs of internet addiction and a winning strategy for recovery. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  44. Young, K. S. (1998b). Internet addiction: The emergence of a new clinical disorder. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 1(3), 237–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of BusinessAjou UniversitySuwonKorea
  2. 2.Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of MedicineAjou UniversitySuwonKorea

Personalised recommendations