Electronic Health Records: Eliciting Behavioral Health Providers’ Beliefs
- 441 Downloads
Interviews with 32 community behavioral health providers elicited perceived benefits and barriers of using electronic health records. Themes identified were (a) quality of care, (b) privacy and security, and (c) delivery of services. Benefits to quality of care were mentioned by 100% of the providers, and barriers by 59% of providers. Barriers involving privacy and security concerns were mentioned by 100% of providers, and benefits by 22%. Barriers to delivery of services were mentioned by 97% of providers, and benefits by 66%. Most providers (81%) expressed overall positive support for electronic behavioral health records.
KeywordsElectronic health records Healthcare provider beliefs Qualitative methods
The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. This project was supported by grant number R18HS017838 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
- Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, 26 U.S.C. 1 Title XIII (2009).Google Scholar
- Audet, A., Doty, M. M., Peugh, J., Shamasdin, J., Zapert, J. S., & Schoenbaum, S. (2004). Information technologies: When will they make it into physicians’ black bags? Medscape General Medicine, 6(4), np.Google Scholar
- Cost and confidentiality: The unforeseen challenges of electronic health records in small specialty: Hearing before the House Committee on Small Business, 110th Cong. np (2008) (testimony of Robert M. Plovnick). Retrieved from http://www.house.gov/smbiz/hearings/hearing-7-31-08-records/Plovnick.pdf.
- Duffy, F. F., West, J. C., Wilk, J., Narrow, W. E., Hales, D., Thompson, J., et al. (2004). Mental health practitioners and trainees. In R. W. Manderscheid & M. J. Henderson (Eds.), Mental Health, United States, 2002. DHHS publication Number: (SMA) 3938 (pp. 327–368). Rockville, MD: US DHHS Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.Google Scholar
- Garets, D., & Davis, M. (2006). Electronic medical records versus electronic health records: Yes, there is a difference. Chicago, IL: HIMSS Analytics. Retrieved from http://www.himssanalytics.org/docs/wp_emr_ehr.pdf.
- Lefkovitz, P. M. (2009). Behavioral health/human services information systems survey: Executive summary/media release. Retrieved from the National Council for Community Behavioral Healthcare website: http://www.thenationalcouncil.org/galleries/policy-file/HIT%20Joint%20Survey%20Exec%20Summary.pdf.
- Penrod, L. E., & Gadd, C. S. (2001). Attitudes of academic-based and community-based physicians regarding EMR use during outpatient encounters. Proceedings of the American Medical Informatics Association, 528-532. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2243431/pdf/procamiasymp00002-0567.pdf.
- Privacy and confidentiality issues concerning the National Health Information Network: Hearings before the Subcommittee on Privacy & Confidentiality, National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics 109th Cong. np (2005, March 30) (testimony of Russ Newman). Retrieved from http://www.ncvhs.hhs.gov/050330tr.htm.
- Salomon, R. M., Blackford, J. U., Rosenbloom, S. T., Seidel, S., Clyton, E. W., Dilts, D. M., et al. (2010). Openness of patients’ reporting with use of electronic records: Psychiatric clinicians’ views. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 17, 54–60. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M3341.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- US Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2009). Mental health research findings (AHRQ Pub. No. 09-P011). Retrieved from http://www.ahrq.gov/research/mentalhth.pdf.
- US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Surgeon General. (1999). Mental health: A report of the surgeon general—executive summary. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar