Computational Geosciences

, Volume 22, Issue 1, pp 363–388 | Cite as

A new streamline model for near-well flow validated with radial flow experiments

Original Paper


Streamline simulation is a powerful tool that can be used for full field forecasting, history matching, flood optimization, and displacement visualization. This paper presents the development and the application of a new semi-analytical streamline simulation method in the near-wellbore region in polar/cylindrical coordinate systems. The main objective of this paper is to study the effects of the permeability heterogeneity and well completion details in the near-wellbore region. These effects dictate the streamline geometries, which in turn influence well productivity. Previous streamline applications used a constant flow rate for each stream tube. In this paper, streamline simulation is performed under the assumption of constant pressure boundaries, which is a novel and non-trivial extension of streamline simulation. Solutions are constructed by treating each stream tube as a flow unit by invoking analytical solutions for such geometries. In addition, visualization experiments are conducted to investigate the effect of the heterogeneity. Two-dimensional waterflooding visualization experiments in radial porous media are performed with constant pressure boundaries. The streamline simulator is applied to history match the relative permeabilities using these experiments, thereby validating the new near-well streamline method.


Streamline simulation Near-wellbore region Two-phase flow Radial flow experiments Constant pressure boundaries Reimann solution 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Batycky, R.P.: A three-dimensional two-phase field scale streamline simulator. doctoral dissertation. Stanford University, Department of Petroleum Engineering, Stanford (1997)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bratvedt, F., Gimse, T., Tegnander, C.: Streamline computations for porous media flow including gravity. Transport in Porous Media, pp. 63–78 (1996)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brock, D.C., Orr, F.M., Jr.: Flow Visualization of Viscous Fingering in Heterogeneous Porous Media. SPE (1991)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Buckley, S.E., Leverett, M.C.: Mechanism of fluid displacement in sands. Trans. AIME 146(01), 107–116 (1942)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Butler, R.M., Mokrys, I.J.: Recovery of heavy oils using vaporized hydrocarbon solvents: further development of the VAPEX process. JCPT 32(6), 56–62 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chatenever, A., Calhoun, J.C.: Visual examinations of fluid behaviour in porous media-part I. Soc. Pet. Eng. 4, 06 (1952)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chatzis, I., Morrow, N., Lim, H.T.: Magnitude and detailed structure of residual oil saturation. Soc. Pet. Eng. J. 23, 311–325 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chen, J.D.: Radial viscous fingering patterns in hele shaw cell. Exp. Fluids 5, 363–371 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cheng, H., Osako, I., Datta-Gupta, A., King, M.J.: A rigorous compressible streamline formulation for two and three-phase black-oil simulation. Society of Petroleum Engineers (2005).
  10. 10.
    Cheng, H., Osako, I., Datta-Gupta, A., King, M.J.: A rigorous compressible streamline formulation for two and three-phase black-oil simulation. Society of Petroleum Engineers (2006).
  11. 11.
    Chuoke, R.L., van Meurs, P., van der Poel, C.: The instability of slow, immiscible, viscous liquid-liquid displacements in permeable media. Pet. Trans. AIME 216(1959), 188–194 (1959)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Corey, A.T.: The interrelation between gas and oil relative permeabilities. Producers Mon. 19(1), 38–41 (1954)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Datta-Gupta, A., King, M.J.A.: Semianalytical approach to tracer flow modelling in heterogeneous permeable media. Advances in Water Resources, pp. 9–14 (1995)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Datta-Gupta, A., King, M.J.: Streamline simulation: theory and practice. Society of Petroleum Engineers, Vol. 11 (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dawe, R.A., Wheat, M.R., Bidner, M.S.: Experimental investigation of capillary pressure effects on immiscible displacement in lensed and layered porous media. Transp. Porous Media 7(1), 83–101 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Emanuel, A.S., Alameda, G.K., Behrens, R.A., Hewett, T.A.: Reservoir performance prediction methods based on fractal geostatics. SPE Reservoir Engineering, pp. 311–318 (1989)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fay, C.H., Pratts, M.: The application of numerical methods to cycling and flooding problems. 3rd World Petroleum Congress (1951)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hadibeik, H., Pour, L.A., Torres-Verdin, C., Sephernoori, K., Shabro, V.: 3D Multiphase Streamline-Based Method for Interpretation of Formation Tester Measurements Acquired in Vertical and Deviate Wells. Society of Petroleum Engineers, Denver (2011)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Huang, H., Zhang, F., Callahan, P., Ayoub, J.: Fluid Injection Experiments in 2D Porous Media. SPE Joural (2012)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    James, L.A., Chatzis, I.: Details of gravity drainage of heavy oil during vapor extraction. In: International Symposium of the Society of Core Analysts (2004)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    James, L.A., Rezaei, N., Chatzis, I.: VAPEX, warm VAPEX and hybrid VAPEX-the state of enhanced oil recovery for in situ heavy oils in Cana. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, Waterloo (2008)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Johansen, T.E., James, L.A.: Solution of multi-component, two-phase Riemann problems with constant pressure boundaries. J. Eng. Math. 96(1), 23–35 (2015). Springer VerlagCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Johansen, T.E., James, L.A., Liu, X.: Fractional flow theory for constant pressure boundaries. a generalization of the buckley-leverett theory for flow of two immiscible phases, Society of Petroleum Engineering Journal (2016)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Johansen, T.E., Liu, X.: Solution of riemann problem for hyperbolic systems of conservation laws modeling two phase flow in general stream tube geometries. Springer Verlag, Journal of Engineering Mathematics (2016)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Juanes, R., Matringe, S.F.: Unified formulation for high-order streamline tracing on two-dimensional unstructured grids. J. Sci. Comput. 38(1), 50–73 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Khorshidian, H., James, L.A., Butt, S.D.: Corner oil film elevation above the gas-oil interface in water-wet capillaries. Presented at the Society of Core Analysts Symposium, St John’s (2015)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lagrange, J.L.: Mémoire sur la théorie du mouvement des fluids, pp 695–748. Oevres de Lagrange, Tome IV (1781)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lake, L.W., Johnston, J.R., Stegemeier, G.L.: Simulation and performance prediction of a large-scale surfactant/polymer project. Soc. Pet. Eng. J. 21, 731–739 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    LeBlanc, J.L., Caudle, B.H.: A streamline model for secondary recovery. Soc. Pet. Eng. J. 1, 7–12 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mathews, J.L., Emanuel, A.S., Edwards, K.A.: Fractal methods improve mitsue miscible predictions. Journal of Petroleum Technology, pp. 1136-1149 (1989)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Matringe, S.F., Gerritsen, M.G.: On accurate tracing of streamlines. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers (2004)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Martin, J.C., Woo, P.T., Wagner, R.E.: Failure of Stream Tube Methods to Predict Waterflood Performance of An Isolated Inverted Five-Spot At Favorable Mobility Ratios. J. Pet. Technol. 25(02), 151–153 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Martin, J.C., Wegner, R.E.: Numerical solution of multiphase, two-dimensional incompressible flow using streamtube relationships. Soc. Pet. Eng. J. 19(5), 313–323 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Moayedi, M., James, L.A., Johansen, T.: Pore scale investigation of carbonated water injection with and without gravity, Colorado (2016)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Muskat, M., Wyckoff, R.: A theoretical analysis of waterflooding net-works. Trans. AIME 107, 62–77 (1934)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Muskat, M.: The flow of homogeneous fluid through porous media. International human resources development corporation. ISSN: 0038-075X (1937)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Pasari, U., Arihara, N.: Application of streamline method to hot water-flooding simulation for heavy oil recovery. Paper SPE 93149 presented at the SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, Jakarta, Indonesia (2005)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Oduntan, A.R., Chatzis, I.: Heavy oil recovery using the VAPEX Process: Scale-Up Issues. Canadian International Petroleum Conference, Calgary, Alberta, paper 2001–127 (2001)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Paterson, L.: Radial Fingering in a Hele Shaw Cell. J. Fluid Mech. 113, 513–529 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Peddibhotla, S., Datta-Gupta, A., Xue, G.: Multiphase streamline modeling in three dimensions: further generalizations and a field application. SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium Dallas. Society of Petroleum Engineers, TX (1997)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Pitts, G.N., Crawford, P.B.: Low areal sweep efficiencies in flooding heterogeneous tock. 9th Biennial Symposium, Production Techniques, Witchita Falls. Society of Petroleum Engineers, TX (1970)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Pollock, D.W.: Semianalytical computation of path lines for finite-difference models. Ground Water 26(6), 743–750 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Rodriguez, P.G., Segura, M.K.C., Moreno, F.J.M.: Streamline methodology using an efficient operator splitting for accurate modelling of capillarity and gravity effects SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium (2003)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Roti, F., Dawe, R.A.: Modelling fluid flow in cross-bedded sections. Trans. Porous Media 12, 143–159 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Silva, J.M., Dawe, R.A.: Effects of permeability and wettability heterogeneities on flow in porous media. SPE Latin American and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference, Port-of-Spain (2003)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Skinner, J.: Near wellbore streamline modelling for advanced well completions. Master Thesis, Memorial University (2011)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Skinner, J., Johansen, T.E.: Near wellbore streamline modelling: its novelty, application, and potential use. International Symposium and Exhibition on Formation Damage Control Lafayette, Louisiana (2012)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Tang, R.W., Behrens, R.A., Emanuel, A.S.: Reservoir studies using geostatistics to forecast performance. SPE Symposium on Reservoir Simulation Houston, TX (1989)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Thiele, M.R.: Modeling multiphase flow in heterogeneous media using streamtubes. Doctoral dissertation. Stanford University, Stanford (1994)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Thiele, M.R.: Streamline simulation 6th international forum on reservoir simulation. Schloss Fuschl, Austria (2001)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Thiele, M.R., Batycky, R.P., Fenwick, D.H.: Streamline simulation for modern reservoir-engineering workflows. Journal of Petroleum Technology Distinguished Author Series, (64–70) (2010)Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Valsecch, P., McDuff, D., Chang, D.L., Huang, H., Burdette, J., Long, T., Karmonik, C.: Simulation and visualization of near-well flow. Society of Petroleum Engineers (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Memorial University of NewfoundlandSt. John’sCanada
  2. 2.Upstream Petroleum Research and Consulting, Inc.St. John’sCanada

Personalised recommendations