Abstract
In this paper, we study newly developed methods for linear elasticity on polyhedral meshes. Our emphasis is on applications of the methods to geological models. Models of subsurface, and in particular sedimentary rocks, naturally lead to general polyhedral meshes. Numerical methods which can directly handle such representation are highly desirable. Many of the numerical challenges in simulation of subsurface applications come from the lack of robustness and accuracy of numerical methods in the case of highly distorted grids. In this paper, we investigate and compare the Multi-Point Stress Approximation (MPSA) and the Virtual Element Method (VEM) with regard to grid features that are frequently seen in geological models and likely to lead to a lack of accuracy of the methods. In particular, we look at how the methods perform near the incompressible limit. This work shows that both methods are promising for flexible modeling of subsurface mechanics.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aavatsmark, I.: An introduction to multipoint flux approximations for quadrilateral grids. Comput. Geosci. 6, 405–432 (2002)
Agélas, L., Guichard, C., Masson, R.: Convergence of finite volume MPFA 0 type schemes for heterogeneous anisotropic diffusion problems on general meshes. International Journal on Finite Volumes, 7 (2010)
Arnold, D.N., Brezzi, F., Douglas, J.: PEERS: a new mixed finite element for plane elasticity. Japan Journal of Applied Mathematics 1(2), 347–367 (1984)
Beirão da Veiga, L., Brezzi, F., Cangiani, A., Manzini, G., Marini, L.D., Russo, A.: Basic principles of virtual element methods. Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences 23(01), 199–214 (2013)
Beirão da Veiga, L., Brezzi, F., Donatella Marini, L.: Virtual elements for linear elasticity problems. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 51(2), 794–812 (2013)
Beirão da Veiga, L., Lipnikov, K., Manzini, G.: Mimetic Finite Difference Method for Elliptic Problems, volume 11 Springer (2014)
Biot, M.A.: General theory of three-dimensional consolidation. J. Appl. Phys. 12(2), 155–164 (1941)
Brezzi, F., Lipnikov, K., Shashkov, M.: Convergence of the mimetic finite difference method for diffusion problems on polyhedral meshes. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 43(5), 1872–1896 (2005)
Brezzi, F., Lipnikov, K., Simoncini, V.: A family of mimetic finite difference methods on polygonal and polyhedral meshes. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 15(10), 1533–1551 (2005)
Gain, A.L., Talischi, C., Paulino, G.H.: On the virtual element method for three-dimensional linear elasticity problems on arbitrary polyhedral meshes. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 282, 132–160 (2014)
Haga, J.B., Osnes, H., Langtangen, H.P.: On the causes of pressure oscillations in low-permeable and low-compressible porous media. Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 36(12), 1507–1522 (2012)
Keilegavlen, E., Nordbotten, J.M.: Finite volume methods for elasticity with weak symmetry. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. NME-Jul-16-0496.R2 (2017)
Klausen, R.A., Winther, R.: Convergence of multipoint flux approximations on quadrilateral grids. Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations 22(6), 1438–1454 (2006)
Klausen, R.A., Winther, R.: Robust convergence of multi point flux approximation on rough grids. Numer. Math. 104(3), 317–337 (2006)
Lie, K.-A., Krogstad, S., Ligaarden, I.S., Natvig, J.R., Nilsen, H.M., Skaflestad, B.: Open source MATLAB implementation of consistent discretisations on complex grids. Comput. Geosci. 16, 297–322 (2012)
Lipnikov, K., Manzini, G., Shashkov, M.: Mimetic finite difference method. J. Comput. Phys. 257, 1163–1227 (2014)
Lipnikov, K., Shashkov, M., Yotov, I.: Local flux mimetic finite difference methods. Numer. Math. 112(1), 115–152 (2009)
The MATLAB reservoir simulation toolbox, version 2016a, 7 (2016)
Nagtegaal, J.C., Parks, D.M., Rice, J.R.: On numerically accurate finite element solutions in the fully plastic range. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 4(2), 153–177 (1974)
Nilsen, H.M., Lie, K.-A., Natvig, J.R.: Accurate modelling of faults by multipoint, mimetic, and mixed methods. SPE J. 17(2), 568–579 (2012)
Nordbotten, J.M.: Cell-centered finite volume discretizations for deformable porous media. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 100(6), 399–418 (2014)
Nordbotten, J.M.: Convergence of a cell-centered finite volume discretization for linear elasticity. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 53(6), 2605–2625 (2015)
Nordbotten, J.M.: Stable cell-centered finite volume discretization for biot equations. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 54(2), 942–968 (2016)
Raynaud, X., Nilsen, H.M., Andersen, O.: Virtual element method for geomechanical simulations of reservoir models. In: ECMOR XV–15th European Conference on the Mathematics of Oil Recovery, Amsterdam, Netherlands (2016)
Raynaud, X., Nilsen, H.M., Andersen, O.: Virtual Element Method for Geomechanics on Reservoir Grids. arXiv:1606.09508v2 (2017)
Zienkiewicz, O.C., Zhu, J.Z.: The superconvergent patch recovery and a posteriori error estimates. part 1: the recovery technique. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 33(7), 1331–1364 (1992)
Acknowledgements
We thank Odd Anderson from SINTEF ICT in Oslo for his help to set up the numerical test case for the Biot model.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nilsen, H.M., Nordbotten, J. & Raynaud, X. Comparison between cell-centered and nodal-based discretization schemes for linear elasticity. Comput Geosci 22, 233–260 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-017-9687-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-017-9687-3