Computational Geosciences

, Volume 22, Issue 1, pp 125–144 | Cite as

Surrogate combining harmonic decomposition and polynomial chaos for seismic shear waves in uncertain media

  • P. Sochala
  • F. De Martin
Original Paper


A polynomial chaos (PC) surrogate is proposed to reconstruct seismic time series in one-dimensional (1D) uncertain media. Our approach overcomes the deterioration of the PC convergence rate during long time integration. It is based on a double decomposition of the signal: a damped harmonic decomposition combined with a polynomial chaos expansion of the four coefficients of each harmonic term (amplitude, decay constant, pulsation, and phase). These PC expansions are obtained through the least squares method which requires the solution of nonlinear least squares problems for each sample point of the stochastic domain. The use of the surrogate is illustrated on vertically incident plane waves traveling in 1D layered, vertically stratified, isotropic, viscoelastic soil structure with uncertainties in the geological data (geometry, wave velocities, quality factors). Computational tests show that the stochastic coefficients can be efficiently represented with a low-order PC expansion involving few evaluations of the direct model. For the test cases, a global sensitivity analysis is performed in time and frequency domains to investigate the relative impact of the random parameters.


Uncertainty propagation Elastodynamic wave equation Pseudo-harmonic decomposition Non intrusive spectral method Least squares Global sensitivity analysis 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



This work is supported by internal fundings of the BRGM (French Geological Survey). P. Sochala is greatful to O. Le Maître for his constructive comments on the polynomial chaos expansion and to F. Smaï for fruitful discussions concerning the harmonic inversion problem. F. De Martin is thankful to F. Hollender, E. Chaljub, E. Maufroy, and P.-Y. Bard for providing the data used for the double layer test case and for their contributions to determine the distributions of the uncertain parameters. The Thomson–Haskell propapagator matrix computations have been done on the 32-cores Intel ®; cluster provided by P. Thierry.


  1. 1.
    Aki, K., Richards, P.G.: Quantitative Seismology, vol. 1. University Science Book (2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alexanderian, A., Le Maître, O., Najm, H., Iskandarani, M., Knio, O.: Multiscale stochastic preconditioners in non-intrusive spectral projection. SIAM J. Sci. Comp. 50(2), 306–340 (2012). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chow, P.L.: Stochastic wave equations with polynomial nonlinearity. Ann. Appl. Probab. 12(1), 361–381 (2002). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Coleman, T.F., Li, Y.: An interior trust region approach for nonlinear minimization subject to bounds. SIAM J. Optim. 6(2), 418–445 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Constantine, P.G., Eldred, M.S., Phipps, E.T.: Sparse pseudospectral approximation method. Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 229, 1–12 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Crestaux, T., Le Maître, O., Martinez, J.M.: Polynomial chaos expansion for sensitivity analysis. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 94(7), 1161–1172 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    De Martin, F.: Influence of the Nonlinear Behavior of Soft Soils on Strong Ground Motions. Ph.D. Thesis, Ecole Centrale Paris, Paris, France (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    De Martin, F., Kawase, H., Modaressi, A.: Nonlinear soil response of a borehole station based on one-dimensional inversion during the 2005 west off fukuoka prefecture earthquake. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 100(1), 151–171 (2010). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ducellier, A., Kawase, H., Matsushima, S.: Validation of a new velocity structure inversion method based on horizontal-to-vertical (H/V) spectral ratios of earthquake motions in the Tohoku area. Japan. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 103(2A), 958–970 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Geli, L., Bard, P.Y., Jullien, B.: The effect of topography on earthquake ground motion: a review and new results. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 78(1), 42–63 (1988)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gerritsma, M., van der Steen, J.B., Vos, P., Karniadakis, G.: Time- dependent generalized polynomial chaos. J. Comput. Phys. 229(22), 8333–8363 (2010). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ghanem, R., Spanos, S.: Stochastic Finite Elements: A Spectral Approach. Springer (1991)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Haskell, N.A.: The dispersion of surface waves in multilayered media. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 43, 17–34 (1953)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hoeffding, W.: A class of statistics with asymptotically normal distribution. Ann. Math. Stat. 19, 293–325 (1948)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Homma, T., Saltelli, A.: Importance measures in global sensitivity analysis of nonlinear models. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 52(1), 1–17 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Iskandarani, M., Wang, S., Srinivasan, A., Carlisle, T.W., Winokur, J., Knio, O.: An overview of uncertainty quantification techniques with application to oceanic and oil-spill simulations. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 121(4), 2789–2808 (2016). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kiyono, J., Toki, K., Sato, T.: Development of stochastic discrete wavenumber method for seismic response analysis of the ground with irregular interfaces. In: Earthquake Resistant Construction and Design, vol. 1, pp. 69–76. Balkema (1994)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kramer, S.L.: Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering. Pearson Education India (1996)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kristekova, M., Kristek, J., Moczo, P.: Time-frequency misfit and goodness-of-fit criteria for quantitative comparison of time signals. Geophys. J. Int. 178(2), 813–825 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kumaresan, R., Tufts, D.W.: Estimation of frequencies of multiple sinusoids: making linear prediction perform like maximum likelihood. Proc. IEEE 70(9), 975–989 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Le Maître, O., Knio, O.: Spectral Methods for Uncertainty Quantification with Applications to Computational Fluid Dynamics. Scientific Computation Springer (2010)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mandelshtam, V.A., Taylor, H. S.: Harmonic inversion of time signals and its applications. J. Chem. Phys. 107(17), 6756–6769 (1997) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mandelshtam, V.A., Taylor, H.S.: Erratum: “harmonic inversion of time signals and its applications” [j. chem. phys. 107, 6756 (1997)]. J. Chem. Phys. 109(10), 4128–4128 (1998). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Manolis, G.D.: Stochastic soil dynamics. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 22(1), 3–15 (2002). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Manolis, G.D., Karakostas, C.: A green’s function method to sh-wave motion in a random continuum. Eng. Anal. Bound. Elem. 27, 93–100 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Manolis, G.D., Shaw, R.: Harmonic wave-propagation through viscoelastic heterogeneous media exhibiting mild stochasticity - i. fundamental solutions. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 15(2), 119–127 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Manolis, G.D., Shaw, R.: Harmonic wave propagation through viscoelastic heterogeneous media exhibiting mild stochasticity — ii. applications. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 15(2), 129–139 (1996). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Maufroy, E., Chaljub, E., Hollender, F., Kristek, J., Moczo, P., Klin, P., Priolo, E., Iwaki, A., Iwata, T., Etienne, V., De Martin, F., Theodulidis, N., Manakou, M., Guyonnet-Benaize, C., Pitilakis, K., Bard, P.Y.: Earthquake ground motion in the mygdonian basin, Greece: The e2vp verification and validation of 3d numerical simulation up to 4 hz. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.; (2015)
  29. 29.
    Millet, A., Morien, P.L.: On a nonlinear stochastic wave equation in the plane: existence and uniqueness of the solution. Ann. Appl. Probab. 11(3), 922–951 (2001). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Molkenthin, C., Scherbaum, F., Griewank, A., Kuehn, N., Stafford, P.: A study of the sensitivity of response spectral amplitudes on seismological parameters using algorithmic differentiation. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 104, 2240–2252 (2014). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Petterson, M., Iaccarino, G., Nordström, J.: Polynomial Chaos Methods for Hyperbolic Partial Differential Equations. Mathematical Engineering, Springer (2015)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ricker, N.: The form and laws of propagation of seismic wavelets. Geophysics 18(1), 10–40 (1953). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rousseau, M., Cerdan, O., Ern, A., Maître, O.L., Sochala, P.: Study of overland flow with uncertain infiltration using stochastic tools. Adv. Water. Resour. 38, 1–12 (2012). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sepahvand, K., Marburg, S., Hardtke, H.J.: Numerical solution of one-dimensional wave equation with stochastic parameters using generalized polynomial chaos expansion. J. Comput. Acous. 15 (04), 579–593 (2007). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Smolyak, S.: Quadrature and interpolation formulas for tensor products of certain classes of functions. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 4(240-243), 123 (1963)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sobol, I.: Sensitivity estimates for nonlinear mathematical models. Math. Model. Comput. Exp. 1, 407–414 (1993)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Thomson, W.: Transmission of elastic waves through a stratified solid. J. Appl. Phys. 21, 89–93 (1950)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Tikhonov, A., Arsenin, V.: Solutions of Ill-Posed Problems. Scripta Series in Mathematics. Winston. (1977)
  39. 39.
    Turányi, T.: Sensitivity analysis of complex kinetic systems, tools and applications. J. Math. Chem. 5(3), 203–248 (1990). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Walsh, J.B.: On numerical solutions of the stochastic wave equation. Illinois J. Math. 50(1–4), 991–1018 (2006) Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Wang, F., Sett, K.: Time-domain stochastic finite element simulation of uncertain seismic wave propagation through uncertain heterogeneous solids. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 88, 369–385 (2016). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Wirgin, A., Bard, P.Y.: Effects of buildings on the duration and amplitude of ground motion in Mexico city. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 86(3), 914 (1996)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Xiu, D., Karniadakis, G.: The wiener-askey polynomial chaos for stochastic differential equations. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 24(2), 619–644 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.BRGMOrléansFrance

Personalised recommendations