Advertisement

Computational Geosciences

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 177–212 | Cite as

Iterative regularization for ensemble data assimilation in reservoir models

  • Marco A. Iglesias
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Abstract

We propose the application of iterative regularization for the development of ensemble methods for solving Bayesian inverse problems. In concrete, we construct (i) a variational iterative regularizing ensemble Levenberg-Marquardt method (IR-enLM) and (ii) a derivative-free iterative ensemble Kalman smoother (IR-ES). The aim of these methods is to provide a robust ensemble approximation of the Bayesian posterior. The proposed methods are based on fundamental ideas from iterative regularization methods that have been widely used for the solution of deterministic inverse problems (Katltenbacher et al. de Gruyter, Berlin 2008). In this work, we are interested in the application of the proposed ensemble methods for the solution of Bayesian inverse problems that arise in reservoir modeling applications. The proposed ensemble methods use key aspects of the regularizing Levenberg-Marquardt scheme developed by Hanke (Inverse Problems 13,79–95 1997) and that we recently applied for history matching in Iglesias (Comput. Geosci. 1–21 2013). Unlike most existing methods where the stopping criteria and regularization parameters are typically selected heuristically, in the proposed ensemble methods, the discrepancy principle is applied for (i) the selection of the regularization parameters and (ii) the early termination of the scheme. The discrepancy principle is key for the theory of iterative regularization, and the purpose of the present work is to apply this principle for the development of ensemble methods defined as iterative updates of solutions to linear ill-posed inverse problems. The regularizing and convergence properties of iterative regularization methods for deterministic inverse problems have long been established. However, the approximation properties of the proposed ensemble methods in the context of Bayesian inverse problems is an open problem. In the case where the forward operator is linear and the prior is Gaussian, we show that the tunable parameters of the proposed IR-enLM and IR-ES can be chosen so that the resulting schemes coincide with the standard randomized maximum likelihood (RML) and the ensemble smoother (ES), respectively. Therefore, the proposed methods sample from the posterior in the linear-Gaussian case. Similar to RML and ES methods, in the nonlinear case, one may not conclude that the proposed methods produce samples from the posterior. The present work provides a numerical investigation of the performance of the proposed ensemble methods at capturing the posterior. In particular, we aim at understanding the role of the tunable parameters that arise from the application of iterative regularization techniques. The numerical framework for our investigations consists of using a state-of-the art Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method for resolving the Bayesian posterior from synthetic experiments. The resolved posterior via MCMC then provides a gold standard against to which compare the proposed IR-enLM and IR-ES. Our numerical experiments show clear indication that the regularizing properties of the regularization methods applied for the computation of each ensemble have significant impact of the approximation properties of the proposed ensemble methods at capturing the Bayesian posterior. Furthermore, we provide a comparison of the proposed regularizing methods with respect to some unregularized methods that have been typically used in the literature. Our numerical experiments showcase the advantage of using iterative regularization for obtaining more robust and stable approximation of the posterior than unregularized methods.

Keywords

Bayesian data assimilation Inverse problems Reservoir models 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Aanonsen, S.I., Naevdal, G., Oliver, D.S., Reynolds, A.C., Valles, B.: The ensemble Kalman filter in reservoir engineering—a review. SPE J. 14(3), 393–412 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bi, Z., Oliver, D.S., Reynolds, A.C.: Conditioning 3D stochastic channels to pressure data. SPE J. 5(4), 474–484 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brooks, S.P., Gelman, A.: General methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations. J. Comput. Graph. Stat. 7, 434–455 (1998)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen, Y., Oliver, D.: Cross-covariances and localization for EnKF in multiphase flow data assimilation. Comput. Geosci. 14, 579–601 (2010). doi: 10.1007/s10596-009-9174-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen, Y., Oliver, D.: Ensemble randomized maximum likelihood method as an iterative ensemble smoother. Math. Geosci. 44, 1–26 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen, Y., Oliver, D.: Levenberg-Marquardt forms of the iterative ensemble smoother for efficient history matching and uncertainty quantification. Comput. Geosci. 17(4), 689–703 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chen, Z., Huan, G., Ma. Y.: Computational methods for multiphase flows in porous media. Society for industrial and applied mathematics, Philadelphia (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cotter, S.L., Roberts, G.O., Stuart, A.M., White, D.: MCMC methods for functions: modifying old algorithms to make them faster. Submitted, page arXiv:1202.0709 (2012)
  9. 9.
    Deutsch, C.V.: Geostatistical reservoir modeling. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2002)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Emerick, A., Reynolds, A.: Combining sensitivities and prior information for covariance localization in the ensemble Kalman filter for petroleum reservoir applications. Comput. Geosci. 15, 251–269 (2011). doi: 10.1007/s10596-010-9198-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Emerick, A., Reynolds, A.C.: History-matching production and seismic data in a real field case using the ensemble smoother with multiple data assimilation. In: Proccedings of the SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, The Woodlands, Texas, USA, 18–20 February, SPE SPE-163645 (2013)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Emerick, A.A., Reynolds, A.C.: Ensemble smoother with multiple data assimilation. Comput. Geosci. 55(0), 3–15 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Emerick, A.A., Reynolds, A.C.: Investigation of the sampling performance of ensemble-based methods with a simple reservoir model. Comput. Geosci. 17(2), 325–350 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Evensen, G.: Data assimilation: the ensemble Kalman filter. Springer Verlag (2009)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Evensen, G.: The ensemble Kalman filter for combined state and parameter estimation. IEEE Control. Syst. 29(3), 83–104 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gao, G., Reynolds, U.A.C.: An improved implementation of the LBFGS algorithm for automatic history matching. In: Proccedings of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 26-29 September 2004, Houston, TexasGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Groetsch, C.W.: The theory of Tikhonov regularization for Fredholm equations of the first kind. Pitman, Boston London Melbourne (1984)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gu, Y., Oliver, D.S.: An iterative ensemble Kalman filter for multiphase fluid flow data assimilation. SPE J.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Haben, S.A., Lawless, A.S., Nichols, N.K.: Conditioning of incremental variational data assimilation, with application to the met office system. Tellus A 63(4), 782–792 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hanke, M.: A regularizing Levenberg-Marquardt scheme, with applications to inverse groundwater filtration problems. Inverse Problems 13, 79–95 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Iglesias, M.A., Law, K.J.H., Stuart, A.M.: Ensemble kalman methods for inverse problems. Inverse Problems 29(4), 045001 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Iglesias, M.A., Dawson, C.: The regularizing Levenberg-Marquardt scheme for history matching of petroleum reservoirs. Comput. Geosci., 1–21 (2013)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Iglesias, M.A., Law, K.J.H., Stuart, A.M.: Evaluation of Gaussian approximations for data assimilation in reservoir models. Comput. Geosci., 1–35 (2013)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jensen, T.K., Hansen, P.C.: Iterative regularization with minimum-residual methods. BIT Numer. Math. 47(1), 103–120 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Katltenbacher, B., Neubauer, A., Scherzer, O.: Iterative regularization methods for nonlinear ill-posed problems. Radon series on computational and applied mathematics, 1st edn. de Gruyter, Berlin (2008)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Li, G., Reynolds, A.: Iterative ensemble kalman filters for data assimilation. SPE J. 14(3), 496–505 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Li, R., Reynolds, A.C., Oliver, D.S.: History matching of three-phase flow production data. SPE J. 8(4), 328–340 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lin, B.: Real-time ensemble control with reduced-order modeling. In Ph.D Thesis. MIT (2012)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Liu, N., Oliver, D.S.: Evaluation of Monte Carlo methods for assessing uncertainty. SPE J. 8, 188–195 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Reynolds, A.C., Oliver, D.S., Liu, N.: Inverse Theory for Petroleum Reservoir Characterization and History Matching. Cambridge University Press (2008). ISBN: 9780521881517, 1st ednGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Reynolds, A.C.: My decade-long journal through the field of ensemble-based data assimilation. EnKF Workshop (2014)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Stuart, A.M.: Inverse problems: a Bayesian perspective. In Acta Numerica, vol. 19 (2010)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Tavakoli, R., Reynolds, A.: Monte Carlo simulation of permeability fields and reservoir performance predictions with SVD parameterization in RML compared with EnKF. Comput. Geosci. 15, 99–116 (2011). doi: 10.1007/s10596-010-9200-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Tavakoli, R., Reynolds, A.C.: History matching with parametrization based on the SVD of a dimensionless sensitivity matrix. SPE J. 15(2), 495–508 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of NottinghamNottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations