Skip to main content
Log in

Monte Carlo simulation of permeability fields and reservoir performance predictions with SVD parameterization in RML compared with EnKF

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Computational Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a previous paper, we developed a theoretical basis for parameterization of reservoir model parameters based on truncated singular value decomposition (SVD) of the dimensionless sensitivity matrix. Two gradient-based algorithms based on truncated SVD were developed for history matching. In general, the best of these “SVD” algorithms requires on the order of 1/2 the number of equivalent reservoir simulation runs that are required by the limited memory Broyden–Fletcher–Goldfarb–Shanno (LBFGS) algorithm. In this work, we show that when combining SVD parameterization with the randomized maximum likelihood method, we can achieve significant additional computational savings by history matching all models simultaneously using a SVD parameterization based on a particular sensitivity matrix at each iteration. We present two new algorithms based on this idea, one which relies only on updating the SVD parameterization at each iteration and one which combines an inner iteration based on an adjoint gradient where during the inner iteration the truncated SVD parameterization does not vary. Results generated with our algorithms are compared with results obtained from the ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF). Finally, we show that by combining EnKF with the SVD-algorithm, we can improve the reliability of EnKF estimates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bissell, R.: Calculating optimal parameters for history matching. In: 4th European Conference on the Mathematics of Oil Recovery (1994)

  2. Evensen, G.: The combined parameter and state problem. Technical Report, Norsk Hydro Research Center (2005)

  3. Evensen, G.: Data Assimilation: The Ensemble Kalman Filter. Springer, Berlin (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Floris, F.J.T., Bush, M.D., Cuypers, M., Roggero, F., Syversveen, A.R.: Methods for quantifying the uncertainty of production forecasts: a comparative study. Pet. Geosci. 7(Supp), 87–96 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gao, G., Reynolds, A.C.: An improved implementation of the LBFGS algorithm for automatic history matching. SPE J. 11(1), 5–17 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gao, G., Zafari, M., Reynolds, A.C.: Quantifying uncertainty for the PUNQ-S3 problem in a Bayesian setting with RML and EnKF. SPE J. 11(4), 506–515 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gaspari, G., Cohn, S.E.: Construction of correlation functions in two and three dimensions. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 125(554), 723–757 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Golub, G.H., van Loan, C.F.: Matrix Computations, 2nd edn. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore (1989)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Grimstad, A.A., Mannseth, T., Naevdal, G., Urkedal, G.: Scale splitting approach to reservoir characterization (SPE-66394). In: 2001 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition (2001)

  10. Grimstad, A.A., Mannseth, T., Aanonsen, S.A., Aavatsmark, I., Cominelli, A., Mantica, S.: Identification of unknown permeability trends from history matching of production data (SPE-77485). In: 2002 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition (2002)

  11. Houtekamer, P.L., Mitchell, H.L.: A sequential ensemble Kalman filter for atmospheric data assimilation. Mon. Weather Rev. 129(1), 123–137 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jacquard, P., Jain, C.: Permeability distribution from field pressure data. Soc. Pet. Eng. J. 5(4), 281–294 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jafarpour, B., McLaughlin, D.B.: Efficient permeability parameterization with the discrete cosine transform. In: Proceedings of the SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium (2007)

  14. Jahns, H.O.: A rapid method for obtaining a two-dimensional reservoir description from well pressure response data. Soc. Pet. Eng. J. 6(12), 315–327 (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kitanidis, P.K.: Quasi-linear geostatistical theory for inversing. Water Resour. Res. 31(10), 2411–2419 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Levenberg, K.: A method for the solution of certain non-linear problems in least squares. Q. Appl. Math. 2, 164–168 (1944)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Li, R., Reynolds, A.C., Oliver, D.S.: History matching of three-phase flow production data. SPE J. 8(4), 328–340 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Marquardt, D.W.: An algorithm for least-squares estimation of nonlinear parameters. J. Soc. Ind. Appl. Math. 11(2), 431–441 (1963)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. O’Leary, D., Simmons, J.: A bidiagonalization-regularization procedure for large scale discretizations of ill-posed problems. SIAM J. Sci. Statist. Comput. 2(4), 474–489 (1981)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Oliver, D.S., He, N., Reynolds, A.C.: Conditioning permeability fields to pressure data. In: European Conference for the Mathematics of Oil Recovery, pp. 1–11 (1996)

  21. Oliver, D.S., Reynolds, A.C., Liu, N.: Inverse Theory for Petroleum Reservoir Characterization and History Matching. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (2008)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Reynolds, A.C., He, N., Chu, L., Oliver, D.S.: Reparameterization techniques for generating reservoir descriptions conditioned to variograms and well-test pressure data. Soc. Pet. Eng. J. 1(4), 413–426 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Reynolds, A.C., He, N., Oliver, D.S.: Reducing uncertainty in geostatistical description with well testing pressure data. In: Schatzinger R.A., Jordan, J.F. (eds.) Reservoir Characterization—Recent Advances, pp. 149–162. American Association of Petroleum Geologists (1999)

  24. Rodriques, J.R.P.: Calculating derivatives for automatic history matching. Comput. Geosci. 10, 119–136 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Sarma, P., Durlofsky, L.J., Aziz, K.: Kernel principal component analysis for efficient differentiable parameterization of multipoint geostatistics. Math Geosci. 40, 3–32 (2008)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Tarantola, A.: Inverse Problem Theory: Methods for Data Fitting and Model Parameter Estimation. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (1987)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Tavakoli, R., Reynolds, A.C.: History matching with parameterization based on the VD of a dimensionless sensitivity matrix (SPE-118952). In: SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium (2009)

  28. Thulin, K., Li, G., Aanonsen, S.I., Reynolds, A.C.: Estimation of initial fluid contacts by assimilation of production data with EnKF. In: Proceedings of the 2007 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition (2007)

  29. Vogel, C.R., Wade, J.G.: Iterative SVD-based methods for ill-posed problems. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 15(3), 736–754 (1994)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Zafari, M., Reynolds, A.C.: EnKF versus RML, theoretical comments and numerical experiments. TUPREP Research Report 22, pp. 195–228 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Zafari, M., Reynolds, A.C.: Assessing the uncertainty in reservoir description and performance predictions with the ensemble Kalman filter. SPE J. 12(3), 382–391 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Zhang, F., Reynolds, A.C.: Optimization algorithms for automatic history matching of production data. In: Proceedings of 8th European Conference on the Mathematics of Oil Recovery, pp. 1–10 (2002)

  33. Zhang, F., Reynolds, A.C., Oliver, D.S.: Evaluation of the reduction in uncertainty obtained by conditioning a 3D stochastic channel to multiwell pressure data. Math. Geol. 34(6), 713–740 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Albert C. Reynolds.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tavakoli, R., Reynolds, A.C. Monte Carlo simulation of permeability fields and reservoir performance predictions with SVD parameterization in RML compared with EnKF. Comput Geosci 15, 99–116 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-010-9200-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-010-9200-8

Keywords

Navigation