Hawaiian hawksbills: a distinct and isolated nesting colony in the Central North Pacific Ocean revealed by mitochondrial DNA

Abstract

Although the hawksbill turtle (Eretmochelys imbricata) nesting colony in Hawaiʻi may constitute one of the smallest hawksbill nesting populations in the world, it is also the largest in the U.S. Pacific Islands and the Central North Pacific Ocean. The isolated nature of the Hawaiian Archipelago has raised interest in the genetic characterization of the population, yet research remains lacking. In this study we use mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) to provide the first genetic characterization of nesting (n = 108) and foraging (n = 29) hawksbills in the Hawaiian Islands. We combine our data with sequences previously published from the West and East Pacific to evaluate the genetic distinctiveness of the nesting assemblage in Hawaiʻi, and to gain insights into the origin of hawksbills found at foraging grounds around the archipelago. We found strong differentiation (FST > 0.238, P-value < 0.001) between the Hawaiʻi hawksbill nesting colony and those in the West and East Pacific, indicating the Hawaiʻi nesting colony is demographically isolated and warrants recognition as a distinct management unit. We also found evidence that the Hawaiʻi nesting colony is likely the primary source of juvenile hawksbills occurring at foraging grounds around the archipelago, conforming to the natal foraging philopatry model and suggesting that hawksbills in Hawaiʻi generally constitute a closed population. Despite these findings, we also found evidence of potential dispersal of turtles from the Hawaiian nesting colony to foraging grounds in the West Pacific. This study lends insights into the life-history of hawksbills around Hawaiʻi that can facilitate effective management decision making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Abreu-Grobois FA, Horrocks JA, Formia A, et al. (2006) New mtDNA D-loop primers which work for a variety of marine turtle species may increase the resolution of mixed stock analysis. In: Frick M, Panagopoulou A, Rees AF, Williams K (eds) Proceedings of the 26th Annual Symposium on Sea Turtle Biology, Book of Abstracts. ISTS, Island of Crete, Greece, p 179.

  2. Arif IA, Khan HA, Bahkali AH et al (2011) DNA marker technology for wildlife conservation. Saudi J Biol Sci 18:219–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2011.03.002

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Avise JC (1989) A role for Molecular Genetics in the Recognition and Conservation of Endangered Species. Trends Ecol Evolution 4(9):279–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(89)90203-6

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Avise JC (2007) Conservation genetics of marine turtles ten years later. In: Frontiers in Wildlife Science: Linking Ecological Theory and Management Application (eds Hewitt D Fulbright T), pp. 295– 314. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida

  5. Beggs J, Horrocks JA, Krueger B (2007) Increase in hawksbill sea turtle Eretmochelys imbricata nesting in Barbados, West Indies. Endanger Species Res 3:159–168. https://doi.org/10.3354/esr003159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bowen BW, Grant WS, Hillis-Starr Z et al (2007) Mixed-stock analysis reveals the migrations of juvenile hawksbill turtles (Eretmochelys imbricata) in the Caribbean Sea. Mol Ecol 16:49–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.03096.x

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bowen BW, Bass AL, Shaio-Mei C et al (2004) Natal homing in juvenile loggerhead turtles (Caretta caretta). Mol Ecol 13:3797–3808. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02356.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Briggs JC (1974) Marine Zoogeography. McGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chung FC, Pilcher NJ, Salmon M, Wyneken J (2009) Offshore Migratory Activity of Hawksbill Turtle (Eretmochelys imbricata) Hatchlings, II. Swimming Gaits, Swimming Speed, and Morphological Comparisons. Chelonian Conserv Biol 8:28–34. https://doi.org/10.2744/CCB-0715.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Drummond AJ, Ashton B, Buxton S et al (2011) Geneious v6.1.2 - 8.1.9. https://www.geneious.com. Accessed 17 Feb 2019.

  11. Dutton PH, Jensen MP, Frey A et al (2014) Population structure and phylogeography reveal pathways of colonization by a migratory marine reptile (Chelonia mydas) in the central and EP. Ecol Evol 4:4317–4331. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1269

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Dutton PH, Balazs GH, LeRoux RA et al (2008) Composition of Hawaiian green turtle foraging aggregations: mtDNA evidence for a distinct regional population. Endanger species Res 5:37–44. https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dutton PH, Hitipeuw C, Zein M et al (2007) Status and Genetic Structure of Nesting Populations of Leatherback Turtles (Dermochelys coriacea) in the Western Pacific. Chelonian Conserv Biol 6:47. https://doi.org/10.2744/1071-8443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dutton PH (1996) Methods for collection and preservation of samples for sea turtle genetic studies. In: Bowen BW, Witzell WN (eds) Proceedings of the International symposium on sea turtle conservation genetics. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-SEFSC-396, Miami, Florida, pp 17–24.

  15. Excoffier L, Lischer HEL (2010) Arlequin suite ver 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol Ecol Resour 10:564–567. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02847.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fraser DJ, Bernatchez L (2001) Adaptive evolutionary conservation: towards a unified concept for defining conservation units. Mol Ecol 10:2741–2752

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gaos AR, Lewison RL, Jensen MP et al (2018) Rookery contributions, movements and conservation needs of hawksbill turtles at foraging grounds in the eastern Pacific Ocean. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 586:203–216. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps12391

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gaos AR, Liles MJ et al (2017a) Living on the edge: Hawksbill turtle nesting and conservation along the Eastern Pacific Rim. Lat Am J Aquat Res. https://doi.org/10.3856/vol45-issue3-fulltext-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gaos AR, Lewison RL, Jensen MP et al (2017b) Natal foraging philopatry in eastern Pacific hawksbill turtles. R Soc Open Sci 4:170153. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.170153

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Gaos AR, Lewison RL, Liles MJ et al (2016) Hawksbill turtle terra incognita: conservation genetics of eastern Pacific rookeries. Ecol Evol. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1897

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Gaos AR, Abreu-Grobois FA, Alfaro-Shigueto J et al (2010) Signs of hope in the eastern Pacific: international collaboration reveals encouraging status for a severely depleted population of hawksbill turtles Eretmochelys imbricata. Oryx 44:595–601. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605310000773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Graham SC (2009) Analysis of the foraging ecology of hawksbill turtles (Eretmochelys imbricata) on Hawai`i Island: an investigation utilizing satellite tracking and stable isotopes. Dissertation, University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa.

  23. Hawaiian Hawksbill Turtle Network (HHTN) (2018) Action Plan for Research and Management of Hawksbill Sea Turtles (Eretmochelys imbricata) in Hawai‘i: 2018–2022. Pacific Islands Region Technical Report. 37 pp.

  24. Jacobson CA, Organ JF, Decker DJ, Batcheller GR (2010) Agencies A Conservation Institution for the 21st Century. Implications for State Wildlife Agencies. https://doi.org/10.2193/2008-485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Jensen MP, FitzSimmons NN, Bourjea J, Hamabata T, Reece J, Dutton PH (2019) The evolutionary history and global phylogeography of the green turtle (Chelonia mydas). J Biogeogr 46:860–870. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.13483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Jensen MP, FitzSimmons NN, Dutton PH, Michael P (2013) Molecular genetics of sea turtles. In: Wyneken J, Lohmann KJ, Musick JA (eds) The Biology of Sea Turtles, vol 3. Boca Raton, FL, pp 135–154

  27. Juvik S, Juvik J, Thomas R (1999) Atlas of Hawaiʻi. University Press of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa

  28. Komoroske LM, Jensen MP, Stewart KR et al (2017) Advances in the Application of Genetics in Marine Turtle Biology and Conservation. Front Mar Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2017.00156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Labastida-Estrada E, Vázquez JRC, Hénaut Y (2019) Genetic structure, origin, and connectivity between nesting and foraging areas of hawksbill turtles of the Yucatan Peninsula: A study for conservation and management. Aquat Conserv 29(2):211–222. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.2999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. LeRoux RA, Dutton PH, Abreu-Grobois FA et al (2012) Re-examination of population structure and phylogeography of hawksbill turtles in the Wider Caribbean using longer mtDNA sequences. J Hered 103:806–820. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/ess055

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Miller S, Dykes D, Polesky H (1988) A simple salting out procedure for extracting DNA from human nucleated cells. Nucleic Acids Res 16(3):1215. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/16.3.1215

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Moritz C (1994) Defining “Evolutionarily Significant Units” for conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 9:373–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(94)90057-4

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Mortimer JA, Donnelly M (2008) Eretmochelys imbricata. In: IUCN 2013. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2013.1. www.iucnredlist.org. Downloaded on 14 August 2019

  34. NMFS and USFWS (2013) Hawksbill sea turtle (Eretmochelys imbricata) 5-year review: summary and evaluation. NOAA, National Marine Fisheries Service, Silver Spring, MD

    Google Scholar 

  35. NMFS & USFWS (1998) Recovery Plan for U.S. Pacific Populations of the Hawksbill Turtle (Eretmochelys imbricata). National Marine Fisheries Service, Silver Spring, MD.

  36. Oliveira LR, Castro RL, Cardenas-Alayza S, Bonatto SL (2012) Conservation genetics of South American aquatic mammals: an overview of gene diversity, population structure, phylogeography, non-invasive methods and forensics. Mammal Review 42:275–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2907.2011.00201.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Okayama TR, Diaz-Fernandez Y, Baba M et al (1999) Genetic diversity of the hawksbill turtle in the Indo-Pacific and Caribbean regions. Chelonian Conserv Biol 3:362–367

    Google Scholar 

  38. Parker DM, Balazs GH, King CS et al (2009) Short-range movements of hawksbill turtles (Eretmochelys imbricata) from nesting to foraging areas within the Hawaiian Islands. Pacific Sci 63:371–382. https://doi.org/10.2984/049.063.0306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Pella J, Masuda M (2001) Bayesian methods for analysis of stock mixtures from genetic characters. Fish Bull 99:151–167

    Google Scholar 

  40. Pita J, Broderick D (2005) Hawksbill turtles in the Solomon Islands. In: Kinan I (ed) Proceedings of the Second Western Pacific Sea Turtle Cooperative Research and Management Workshop. Volume I: West Pacific Leatherback and Southwest Pacific Hawksbill Sea Turtles. Western Pacific Regional Fishery Management Council, Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, USA, pp 101–102

  41. Putman NF, Mansfield KL (2015) Direct evidence of swimming demonstrates active dispersal in the sea turtle “lost years”. Curr Biol 25:1221–1227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.03.014

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Richardson JI, Hall DB, Mason P et al (2006) Eighteen years of saturation tagging data reveal a significant increase in nesting hawksbill sea turtles (Eretmochelys imbricata) on Long Island, Antigua. Anim Conserv 9:302–307. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1795.2006.00036.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Richardson JI, Bell R, Richardson TH (1999) Population ecology and demographic implications drawn from an 11-year study of nesting hawksbill turtles, Eretmochelys imbricata, at Jumby Bay, Long Island, Antigua, West Indies. Chelonian Conserv Biol 3:244–250

    Google Scholar 

  44. Sanford E, Kelly MW (2011) Local Adaptation in Marine Invertebrates. Annu Rev Mar Sci 3:509–535. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-120709-142756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Schwartz MW, Iverson LR, Prasad AM et al (2006) Predicting extinctions as a result of climate change. Ecology 87(7):1611–1615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Seitz WA, Kagimoto KM, Luehrs B, Katahira L (2012) Twenty years of conservation and research findings of the Hawaiʻi Island Hawksbill Turtle Recovery Project, 1989–2009. Technical Report No. 178. The Hawaiʻi Pacific Islands Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit & Pacific Cooperative Studies Unit, University of Hawaiʻi at Māmpa, Honolulu, Hawaiʻi. 117 pages

  47. Seminoff JA, Allen CD, Balazs GH, et al. (2015) Status review of the green turtle (Chelonia mydas) under the U.S. Endangered Species Act. NOAA Technical Memorandum, NOAA-NMFS-SWFSC-539. 571pp.

  48. Van Houtan KS, Francke DL, Alessi S et al (2016) The developmental biogeography of hawksbill sea turtles in the North Pacific. Ecol Evol 6:2378–2389. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2034

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Van Houtan KS, Kittinger JN, Lawrence AL et al (2012) Hawksbill sea turtles in the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands. Chelonian Conserv Biol 11:117–121. https://doi.org/10.2744/CCB-0984.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Vargas SM, Jensen MP, Ho SYW et al (2016) Phylogeography, Genetic Diversity, and Management Units of Hawksbill Turtles in the Indo-Pacific. J Hered. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/esv091

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Wallace BP, DiMatteo AD, Hurley BJ, Finkbeiner EM, Bolten AB, Chaloupka MY, Hutchinson BJ et al (2010) Regional management units for marine turtles: a novel framework for prioritizing conservation and research across multiple scales. PLoS ONE 5:e15465. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0015465

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Waples RS (1995) Evolutionarily Significant Units and the Conservation of Biological Diversity under the Endangered Species Act. American Fisheries Society Symposium 17. Bethesda, MD, pp 8–27

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We recognize the Hawai‘i Island Hawksbill Project, World Turtle Trust, and Hawaiʻi Volcanoes National Park for monitoring and skin sampling activities carried out on Hawaiʻi Island, as well as Hawaiʻi Wildlife Fund for activities carried out on Maui. These projects were largely supported via financial contributions from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Pacific Islands Regional Office under award numbers NA10, NA15, NA15NMF4540116, NA10NMF4540137, NA09NMF4540158, NA08NMF4540524, NA07NMF4540171, NA15NMF4540113, NA14NMF4540135, NA13NMF4540072, NA12NMF4540208. We also thank the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), Hawaiʻi State Department of Land and Natural Resources, Hawaiʻi Marine Animal Response, Maui Ocean Center Marine Institute and Division of Aquatic Resources. We are indebted to Larry Katahira, Will Seitz, Skippy Hau, Bill Gilmartin, Kelly Peebles, Eldridge Naboa, Shandell Brunson, Shawn Murakawa, Christi Feeter, Meghan Soukup, Bridget McBride, Donna Brown, and the hundreds of dedicated volunteers that have participated in hawksbill monitoring over the years. Many thanks to Amy Lanci, Amy Frey, Vicki Pease, Gabriela Serra-Valente for their assistance with curation, processing, and laboratory analysis of samples accessioned into the Marine Mammal and Sea Turtle Research (MMSTR) Collection at the Southwest Fisheries Science Center’s La Jolla Laboratory in California. Thanks to Michael Jensen for input on data analysis and Irene Kelly for supporting field work. We appreciate the feedback received from two anonymous reviewers, which helped to improve this manuscript. All hawksbill handling procedures were approved (SWPI_2013-05R) by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee in accordance with the requirements pertaining to animal subject protections within the Public Health Service Policy and United States Department of Agriculture Animal Welfare Regulations. Research was carried out under USFWS permits # TE8292509, TE739923, TE829250, TE739350, and TE72088A and State of Hawai‘i Department of Land and Natural Resources Special Activity Permits.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander R. Gaos.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 110 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gaos, A.R., LaCasella, E.L., Kurpita, L. et al. Hawaiian hawksbills: a distinct and isolated nesting colony in the Central North Pacific Ocean revealed by mitochondrial DNA. Conserv Genet (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-020-01287-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Conservation genetics
  • Stock structure
  • Control region
  • Marine turtles
  • Mixed stock analysis