Conservation Genetics

, Volume 16, Issue 5, pp 1195–1207 | Cite as

Landscape-level analysis of mountain goat population connectivity in Washington and southern British Columbia

  • Leslie C. Parks
  • David O. Wallin
  • Samuel A. Cushman
  • Brad H. McRae
Research Article


Habitat fragmentation and habitat loss diminish population connectivity, reducing genetic diversity and increasing extinction risk over time. Improving connectivity is widely recommended to preserve the long-term viability of populations, but this requires accurate knowledge of how landscapes influence connectivity. Detectability of landscape effects on gene flow is highly dependent on landscape context, and drawing conclusions from single landscape studies may lead to ineffective management strategies. We present a novel approach to elucidate regional variation in the relative importance of landscape variable effects on gene flow. We demonstrate this approach by evaluating gene flow between isolated, genetically impoverished mountain goat (Oreamnos americanus) populations in Washington and much larger, genetically robust populations in southern British Columbia. We used geneland to identify steep genetic gradients and then employed individual-based landscape genetics in a causal modeling framework to independently evaluate landscape variables that may be generating each of these genetic gradients. Our results support previous findings that freeways, highways, water, agriculture and urban landcover limit gene flow in this species. Additionally, we found that a previously unsupported landscape variable, distance to escape terrain, also limits gene flow in some contexts. By integrating geneland and individual-based methods we effectively identified regional limiting factors that have landscape-level implications for population viability.


Population connectivity geneland Circuit theory Causal modeling Oreamnos americanus 



We thank Andrew Shirk (University of Washington), Cliff Rice (WDFW), Brian Harris, Darryl Reynolds and Christ Proctor (BC Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations), Cliff Nietvelt (BC Ministry of the Environment), Katy Chambers (BC Parks and Protected Areas), Aaron Shafer (Uppsala University), Kim Poole (Aurora Wildlife Research) and David Paetkau (Wildlife Genetics International) for their collaboration. We thank Samuel Wasser and Rebecca Nelson Booth (University of Washington) for assistance developing sample collection protocol and Ken Warheit, Scott Blankenship and Cheryl Dean (WDFW) for genotyping. Funding was provided by the WDFW Aquatic Lands Enhancement Account, Seattle City Light, the Mountaineers Foundation, the Mazamas, the Safari Club International Foundation, the Washington Chapter of the Wildlife Society, Western Washington University Office of Research and Sponsored Programs and Huxley College of the Environment.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. Amos J, Bennet AF, Mac Nally R, Newell G, Radford JQ, Pavlova A, Thompson J, White M, Sunnucks P (2012) Predicting landscape genetic consequences of habitat loss, fragmentation and mobility for species of woodland birds. PLoS One 7:1–12Google Scholar
  2. Balkenhol N, Waits LP, Dezzani RJ (2009) Statistical approaches in landscape genetics: an evaluation of methods for linking landscape and genetic data. Ecography 32:818–830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balkenhol N, Pardini R, Cornelius C, Fernandes F, Sommer S (2013) Landscape-level comparison of genetic diversity and differentiation in a small mammal inhabiting different fragmented landscapes of the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Conserv Genet 14:355–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beier P, Spencer W, Baldwin RF, McRae BH (2011) Toward best practices for developing regional connectivity maps. Conserv Biol 25:879–892CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Blair C, Weigel DE, Balazik M, Keeley ATH, Walker FM, Landguth E, Cushman S, Murhpy M, Waits L, Balkenhol N (2012) A simulation-based evaluation of methods for inferring linear barriers to gene flow. Mol Ecol Resour 12:822–833CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bowcock AM, Ruiz-Linares A, Tomfohrde J, Minch E, Kidd JR, Cavalli-Sforza LL (1994) High resolution of human evolutionary trees with polymorphic microsatellites. Nature 368:455–457CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Butchart SHM, Walpole M, Collen B, van Strien A, Scharlemann JPW, Almond REA, Baillie JEM, Bomhard B, Brown C, Bruno J, Carpenter KE, Carr GM, Chanson J, Chenery AM, Csirke J, Davidson NC, Dentener F, Foster M, Galli A, Galloway JN, Genovesi P, Gregory RD, Hockings M, Kapos V, Lamarque JF, Leverington F, Loh J, McGeoch MA, McRae L, Minasyan A, Morcillo MH, Oldfield TEE, Pauly D, Quader S, Revenga C, Sauer JR, Skolnik B, Spear D, Stanwell-Smith D, Stuart SN, Symes A, Tierney M, Tyrrell TD, Vie JC, Watson R (2010) Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines. Science 328:1164–1168CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Castillo JA, Epps CW, Davis AR, Cushman SA (2014) Landscape effects on gene flow for a climate-sensitive montane species, the American pika. Mol Ecol 23:843–856CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Crnokrak P, Roff DA (1999) Inbreeding depression in the wild. Heredity 83:260–270CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Crooks KR, Sanjayan MA (2006) Connectivity conservation. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cushman SA, Landguth EL (2010) Spurious correlations and inference in landscape genetics. Mol Ecol 19:3592–3602CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Cushman SA, McKelvey KS, Hayden J, Schwartz MK (2006) Gene flow in complex landscapes: testing multiple hypotheses with causal modeling. Am Nat 168:486–499CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Cushman SA, Raphael MG, Ruggiero LF, Shirk AJ, Wasserman TN, O’Doherty EC (2011) Limiting factors and landscape connectivity: the American marten in the Rocky Mountains. Landsc Ecol 26:1137–1149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cushman SA, Landguth EL, Shirk AJ (2012) Separating the effects of habitat area, fragmentation and matrix resistance on genetic differentiation in complex landscapes. Landsc Ecol 27:369–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cushman SA, Shirk AJ, Landguth EL (2013a) Landscape genetics and limiting factors. Conserv Genet 14:263–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cushman SA, Wasserman TN, Landguth EL, Shirk AJ (2013b) Re-evaluating causal modeling ith Mantel tests in landscape genetics. Diversity 5:51–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dunn SJ, Clancey E, Waits LP, Byers J (2011) Inbreeding depression in pronghorn (Antilocapra americana) fawns. Mol Ecol 20:4889–4898CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Etherington TR (2011) Python based GIS tools for landscape genetics: visualizing genetic relatedness and measuring landscape connectivity. Methods Ecol Evol 2:52–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Festa-Bianchet M, Côté S (2008) Mountain goats: ecology, behavior, and conservation of an alpine ungulate. Island Press, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  20. Fischer J, Lindenmayer DB (2007) Landscape modification and habitat fragmentation: a synthesis. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 16:265–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Galbreath K, Hafner D, Zamudio K (2009) When cold is better: climate-driven elevation shifts yield complex patterns of diversification and demography in an alpine specialist (American pika, Ochotona princeps). Evolution 63:2848–2863CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Goslee SC, Urban DL (2007) The ecodist package for dissimilarity-based analysis of ecological data. J Stat Softw 22:1–19Google Scholar
  23. Graves TA, Beier P, Royle JA (2013) Current approaches using genetic distances produce poor estimates of landscape resistance to interindividual dispersal. Mol Ecol 22:3888–3903CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Guillot G, Rousset F (2011) On the use of the simple and partial Mantel tests in presence of spatial autocorrelation. Mol Ecol. doi: 10.1111/mec.12172.arXiv:1112.0651v1 Google Scholar
  25. Guillot G, Rousset F (2013) Dismantling the Mantel tests. Methods Ecol Evol 4:336–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Guillot G, Estoup A, Mortier F, Cosson JF (2005) A spatial statistical model for landscape genetics. Genetics 170:1261–1280CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Hampe A, Petit RJ (2005) Conserving biodiversity under climate change: the rear edge matters. Ecol Lett 8:461–467CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Heller NE, Zavaleta ES (2009) Biodiversity management in the face of climate change: a review of 22 years of recommendations. Biol Conserv 142:14–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Holderegger R, Wagner H (2008) Landscape genetics. Bioscience 58:199–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Houston DB, Schreiner EG, Moorhead BB (1994) Mountain goats in Olympic National Park: biology and management of an introduced species. USDI National Park Service Scientific Monograph, DenverGoogle Scholar
  31. Jaquiéry J, Broquet T, Hirzel AH, Yearsley J, Perrin N (2011) Inferring landscape effects on dispersal from genetic distances: how far can we go? Mol Ecol 20:692–705CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Keller L, Waller D (2002) Inbreeding effects in wild populations. Trends Ecol Evol 17:230–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Keyghobadi N (2007) The genetic implications of habitat fragmentation for animals. Can J Zool 85:1049–1064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Krosby M, Tewksbury J, Haddad NM, Hoekstra J (2010) Ecological connectivity for a changing climate. Conserv Biol 24:1686–1689CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Lande R (1995) Mutation and conservation. Conserv Biol 9:782–791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lande R (1998) Risk of population extinction from fixation of deleterious and reverse mutations. Genetica 103:21–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Legendre P, Fortin M (2010) Comparison of the Mantel test and alternative approaches or detecting complex multivariate relationships in the spatial analysis of genetic data. Mol Ecol Resour 10:831–844CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Legendre P, Legendre L (1998) Numerical ecology, 2nd edn. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  39. Lynch M, Conery J, Burger R (1995) Mutation accumulation and the extinction of small populations. Am Nat 146:489–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mainguy J, Côté SD, Coltman DW (2009) Multilocus heterozygosity, parental relatedness and individual fitness components in a wild mountain goat Oreamnos americanus population. Mol Ecol 18:2297–2306CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Manel S, Schwartz MK, Luikart G, Taberlet P (2003) Landscape genetics: combining landscape ecology and population genetics. Trends Ecol Evol 18:189–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mantel N (1967) The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res 27:209–220PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. McRae BH (2006) Isolation by resistance. Evolution 60:1551–1561CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. McRae BH, Beier P (2007) Circuit theory predicts gene flow in plant and animal populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:19885–19890CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. McRae BH, Shah VB (2009) Circuitscape user guide. The University of California, Santa Barbara. Accessed 12 Sep 2011
  46. Meirmans PG (2012) The trouble with isolation by distance. Molecular Ecol 21:2839–2846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ortega J, Yannic G, Shafer ABA, Mainguy J, Festa-Bianchet M, Coltman DW, Côté SD (2011) Temporal dynamics of genetic variability in a mountain goat (Oreamnos americanus) population. Mol Ecol 20:1601–1611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Parks LC (2013) Mountain goat genetic diversity and population connectivity in Washington and southern British Columbia. Thesis, Western Washington UniversityGoogle Scholar
  49. Patterson N, Price AL, Reich D (2006) Population structure and eigenanalysis. PLoS Genet 2:2074–2093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Peakall R, Smouse PE (2006) GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes 6:288–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Poole KG, Reynolds DM (2010) Mt. Meager mountain goat aerial survey and DNA census, 2009. British Columbia Conservation Foundation. Accessed 14 Apr 2012
  52. Pritchard JK, Stehpens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Raufaste N, Rousset F (2001) Are partial Mantel tests inadequate? Evolution 55:1703–1705CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) GENEPOP (Version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J Hered 86:248–249Google Scholar
  55. Rice C, Gay D (2010) Effects of mountain goat harvest on historic and contemporary populations. Northwestern Nat 91:40–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Root TL, Price JT, Hall KR, Schneider SH, Rosenzweig C, Pounds JA (2003) Fingerprints of global warming on wild animals and plants. Nature 421:57–60CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Rousset F (1997) Genetic differentiation and estimation of gene flow from F-statistics under isolation by distance. Genetics 145:1219–1228PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Rousset F (2000) Genetic differentiation between individuals. J Evol Biol 13:58–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rousset F (2008) genepop ‘007: a complete re-implementation of the genepop software for Windows and Linux. Mol Ecol Resour 8:103–106CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Rutledge LY, Holloway JJ, Patterson BR, White BN (2009) An improved field method to obtain DNA for individual identification from wolf scat. J Wildl Manag 8:1430–1435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Segelbacher G, Cushman SA, Epperson BK, Fortin M, Francois O, Hardy OJ, Holderegger R, Taberlet P, Waits LP, Manel S (2010) Applications of landscape genetics in conservation biology: concepts and challenges. Conserv Genet 11:375–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Seutin G, White BN, Boag PT (1991) Preservation of avian blood and tissue samples for DNA analysis. Can J Zool 69:82–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sexton JP, Strauss SY, Rice KJ (2011) Gene flow increases fitness at the warm edge of a species’ range. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:11704–11709CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Shafer ABA, Côté SD, Coltman DW (2011) Hot spots of genetic diversity descended from multiple Pleistocene refugia in an alpine ungulate. Evolution 65:125–138CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Shafer ABA, Northrup JM, White KS, Boyce MS, Côté SD, Coltman DW (2012) Habitat selection predicts genetic relatedness in an alpine ungulate. Ecology 93:1317–1329CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Shirk AJ (2009) Mountain goat genetic structure, molecular diversity, and gene flow in the Cascade Range, Washington. Thesis, Western Washington UniversityGoogle Scholar
  67. Shirk AJ, Cushman SA (2011) sGD: software for estimating spatially explicit indices of genetic diversity. Mol Ecol Resour 11:922–934CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Shirk AJ, Wallin DO, Cushman SA, Rice CG, Warheit KI (2010) Inferring landscape effects on gene flow: a new model selection framework. Mol Ecol 19:3603–3619CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Shirk AJ, Cushman SA, Landguth EL (2012) Simulating pattern-process relationships to validate landscape genetic models. Int J Ecol 2012:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Short Bull RA, Cushman SA, Mace R, Chilton T, Kendall KC, Landguth EL, Schwartz MK, McKelvey KS, Allendorf FW, Luikart G (2011) Why replication is important in landscape genetics: american black bear in the Rocky Mountains. Mol Ecol 20:1092–1107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Smith CA (1994) Bi-level analysis of habitat selection by mountain goats in coastal Alaska. Proceedings of the biennial symposium of the northern wild sheep and goat council, vol, pp 5366–379Google Scholar
  72. Smouse PE, Long JC, Sokal RR (1986) Multiple-regression and correlation extensions of the Mantel test of matrix correspondence. Syst Zool 35:627–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Spear SF, Balkenhol N, Fortin MJ, McRae BH, Scribner K (2010) Use of resistance surfaces for landscape genetic studies: considerations for parameterization and analysis. Mol Ecol 19:3576–3591CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Taylor PD, Fahrig L, Henein K, Merriam G (1993) Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure. Oikos 68:571–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Thomas CD, Cameron A, Green RE, Bakkenes M, Beaumont LJ, Collingham YC, Erasmus BFN, de Siqueira MF, Grainger A, Hannah L, Hughes L, Huntley B, van Jaarsveld AS, Midgley GF, Miles L, Ortega-Huerta MA, Peterson AT, Phillips OL, Williams SE (2004) Extinction risk from climate change. Nature 427:145–148CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. US Geological Survey, GAP Analysis Program (GAP) (2012) Protected Areas Database of the United States (PADUS), version 1.3Google Scholar
  77. Van Oosterhout C, Hutchinson WF, Wills DPM, Shipley P (2004) MICRO-CHECKER: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol Ecol Notes 4:535–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Warren MJ, Wallin DO, Beausoleil RA, Warheit KI (2015) Genetic structure and landscape resistance to gene flow in cougars in Washington and southern British Columbia. Manuscript submitted for publicationGoogle Scholar
  79. Washington Wildlife Habitat Connectivity Working Group (WHCWG) (2010) Washington connected landscapes project: statewide analysis. Washington Departments of Fish and Wildlife, and Transportation, Olympia. Accessed 15 Oct 2011
  80. Wells A, Wallin DO, Rice CG, Wan-Ying C (2011) GPS bias correction and habitat selection by mountain goats. Remote Sens 3:435–459Google Scholar
  81. Wiegand T, Revilla E, Moloney KA (2005) Effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on population dynamics. Conserv Biol 19:108–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Willi Y, Van Buskirk J, Hoffmann AA (2006) Limits to the adaptive potential of small populations. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 37:433–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leslie C. Parks
    • 1
  • David O. Wallin
    • 1
  • Samuel A. Cushman
    • 2
  • Brad H. McRae
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Environmental Sciences, Huxley College of the EnvironmentWestern Washington UniversityBellinghamUSA
  2. 2.Rocky Mountain Research Station, U.S. Forest ServiceFlagstaffUSA
  3. 3.The Nature Conservancy, North America RegionFort CollinsUSA

Personalised recommendations