Conservation Genetics

, Volume 12, Issue 6, pp 1603–1618 | Cite as

Limited pollen-mediated dispersal and partial self-incompatibility in the rare ironstone endemic Tetratheca paynterae subsp. paynterae increase the risks associated with habitat loss

  • P. A. Butcher
  • D. Bradbury
  • S. L. Krauss
Research Article


Patterns of mating and dispersal are key factors affecting the dynamics, viability and evolution of plant populations. Changes in mating system parameters can provide evidence of anthropogenic impacts on populations of rare plants. Tetratheca paynterae subsp. paynterae is a critically endangered perennial shrub confined to a single ironstone range in Western Australia. Mining of the range removed 25% of plants in 2004 and further plants may be removed if the viability of the remaining populations is not compromised. To provide baseline genetic data for monitoring mining impacts, we characterised the mating system and pollen dispersal over two seasons in T. paynterae subsp. paynterae and compared mating system parameters with two other ironstone endemics, T. paynterae subsp. cremnobata and T. aphylla subsp. aphylla that were not impacted by mining. T. paynterae subsp. paynterae was the only taxon showing evidence of inbreeding (t m = 0.89), although hand pollination revealed pre-zygotic self-incompatibility limits the production of seed from self-pollen. In a year of lower fruit set (2005), the estimate of correlated paternity increased from 20 to 35%. Direct estimates of realised pollen dispersal, made by paternity assignment in two small populations where all adult plants were genotyped, revealed a leptokurtic distribution with 30% of pollen dispersed less than 3 m and 90% less than 15 m. Restricted pollen dispersal maintains the strong genetic structuring of the adult populations in succeeding generations. As a consequence of preferential outcrossing, any reduction in effective population size, flowering plant density and/or the abundance and activity of pollinators may impact negatively on population viability through reduced seed set, increased inbreeding and increased correlated paternity.


Tetratheca Breeding system Paternity analysis Pollen flow Microsatellite Mining impacts 



Funding from Portman Iron Ore Pty Ltd and access to unpublished technical reports is gratefully acknowledged. We also acknowledge support provided by Piers Goodman, James Hesford and Rob Howard from Portman Iron Ore Pty Ltd, field assistance provided by Janet Anthony from Kings Park and Botanic Garden (BGPA), Geoff Cockerton, Shapelle McNee and Gemma McLean from Western Botanical, Colin Yates and Rebecca Dillon from the Department of Environment and Conservation and technical advice on pollination provided by Patrick Courtney from BGPA. Constructive comments from two anonymous referees are also acknowledged. Seed was collected under permit No. SW010813 issued under the Western Australian Wildlife Conservation Act 1950.


  1. Alexander MP, Ganeshan S (1989) An improved method for in vitro germination of recalcitrant pollen. Biotechnic Histochem 64:225–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alford JJ (1995) Two new species of Tetratheca (Tremandraceae), from the Coolgardie and Austin Botanical Districts, Western Australia. Nuytsia 10:143–149Google Scholar
  3. Bond WJ (1994) Do mutualisms matter? Assessing the impact of pollinator and disperser disruption on plant extinction. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 344:83–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buchmann SL, Cane JH (1989) Bees assess pollen returns while sonicating Solanum flowers. Oecologia 81:289–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Butcher PA, Krauss SL (2009) Development of microsatellites from the rare ironstone endemic, Tetratheca paynterae subsp. paynterae and cross species amplification. Mol Ecol Res 9:386–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Butcher PA, Moran GF, Perkins HD (1998) RFLP diversity in the nuclear genome of Acacia mangium. Heredity 81:205–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Butcher PA, McNee SA, Krauss SL (2009) Genetic impacts of habitat loss on the rare ironstone endemic, Tetratheca paynterae subsp. paynterae. Conserv Genet 10:1735–1746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Butcher R (2007) New taxa of ‘leafless’ Tetratheca (Elaeocarpaceae, formerly Tremandraceae) from Western Australia. Aust Syst Bot 20:139–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Butcher R, Byrne M, Crayn DM (2007) Evidence for convergent evolution among phylogenetically distant rare species of Tetratheca (Elaeocarpaceae, formerly Tremandraceae) from Western Australia. Aust Syst Bot 20:126–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crawford TJ (1984) The estimation of neighbourhood parameters for plant populations. Heredity 52:273–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. de Nettancourt D (1997) Incompatibility in angiosperms. Sex Plant Reprod 10:185–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Driscoll C (2003) Pollination ecology of Tetratheca juncea (Tremandaceae): finding the pollinators. Cunninghamia 8:133–140Google Scholar
  13. Eckert CG, Kalisz S, Geber MA, Sargent R, Elle E, Cheptou P-O, Goodwillie C, Johnston MO, Kelly JK, Moeller DA, Porcher E, Ree RH, Vallejo-Marin M, Winn AA (2009) Plant mating systems in a changing world. TREE 25:35–43PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Ellstrand NC, Elam DR (1993) Population genetic consequences of small population size: implications for plant conservation. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 24:217–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gibson N, Coates DJ, Thiele KR (2007) Taxonomic research and the conservation status of flora in the Yilgarn banded iron formation ranges. Nuytsia 17:1–12Google Scholar
  16. Gibson N, Yates CJ, Dillon R (2010) Plant communities of the ironstone ranges of South Western Australia: hotspots for plant diversity and mineral deposits. Biodivers Conserv 19:3951–3962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goodwillie C, Kalisz S, Eckert CG (2005) The evolutionary enigma of mixed mating systems in plants: occurrence, theoretical explanations and empirical evidence. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 36:47–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gross CL, Mackay D (1998) Honeybees reduce fitness in the pioneer shrub Melastoma affine (Melastomataceae). Biol Conserv 86:169–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gross CL, Bartier FV, Mulligan DR (2003) Floral structure, breeding system and fruit set in the threatened sub shrup Tetratheca juncea Smith (Tremandaceae). Ann Bot 92:771–777PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Harder LD, Barclay RMR (1994) The functional significance of poricidal anthers and buzz pollination: controlled pollen removal from Dodecatheon. Funct Ecol 8:509–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hopper SD (2009) OCBIL theory: towards an integrated understanding of the evolution, ecology and conservation of biodiversity on old, climatically buffered, infertile landscapes. Plant Soil 322:49–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ivey CT, Wyatt R (1999) Family outcrossing rates and neighbourhood floral density in natural populations of swamp milkweed (Asclepias incarnata); potential statistical artifacts. Theor App Genet 98:1063–1071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jain SK (1976) The evolution of inbreeding in plants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 7:469–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jarne P, Charlesworth D (1993) The evolution of selfing rate in functionally hermaphrodite plants and animals. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 24:441–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kalinowski ST, Taper ML, Marshall TC (2007) Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Mol Ecol 16:1099–1106PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. King MJ, Buchmann SL (1996) Sonication dispensing of pollen from Solanum laciniatum flowers. Funct Ecol 10:449–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Knight TM, Steets JA, Vamosi JC et al (2005) Pollen limitation of plant reproduction: pattern and process. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 36:467–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lascalles DF (2007) Black smokers and density currents: a uniformitarian model for the genesis of banded iron-formations. Ore Geol Rev 32:281–411Google Scholar
  29. Lloyd DG (1965) Evolution of self-compatibility and racial differentiation in Leavenworthia (Crucifereae). Contrib Gray Herb Harv Univ 195:3–134Google Scholar
  30. Lloyd DG (1992) Self- and cross-fertilization in plants. II. The selection of self-fertilization. Int J Plant Sci 153:370–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Marshall TC, Slate J, Kruuk LEB, Pemberton JM (1998) Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol Ecol 7:639–655PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mathews ML, Endress PK (2002) Comparative floral structure and systematics in Oxalidales (Oxalidaceae, Connaraceae, Brunelliaceae, Cephalotaceae, Cunoniaceae, Elaeocarpaceae, Tremandraceae). Bot J Linn Soc 140:321–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mucina L, Wardell-Johnson GW (2011) Landscape age and soil fertility, climatic stability, and fire regime predicability: beyond the OCBIL framework. Plant Soil. doi: 10.1007/s11104-011-0734-x
  34. Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bio-assays with tobacco callus culture. Physiol Plant 15:473–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ritland K (1989) Correlated matings in the partial selfer Mimulus guttatus. Evolution 43:848–859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ritland K (2002) Extensions of models for the estimation of mating systems using n independent loci. Heredity 88:221–228PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schoen DJ (1982) The breeding system of Gilia archilleifolia: variation in floral characteristics and outcrossing rate. Evolution 36:352–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schwartz MK, Luikart G, Waples RS (2007) Genetic monitoring as a promising tool for conservation and management. TREE 22:25–33PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Sharifi MR, Gibson AC, Rundel PW (1997) Surface dust impacts on gas exchange in Mojave Desert shrubs. J Appl Ecol 34:837–846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Shaw DV, Kahler AL, Allard RW (1980) A multilocus estimator of mating system parameters in plant populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78:1298–1302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Underwood AJ (1994) On beyond BACI: sampling designs that might reliably detect environmental disturbances. Ecol Appl 4:3–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Uyenoyama MK (1986) Inbreeding and the cost of meiosis: the evolution of selfing in populations practicing biparental inbreeding. Evolution 40:388–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Vaknin Y, Gan-Mor S, Bechar A, Ronen B, Eisikowitch D (2000) The role of electrostatic forces in pollination. Plant Syst Evol 222:133–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Willi Y, Van Buskirk J, Hoffmann AA (2006) Limits to the adaptive potential of small populations. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 37:433–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wyatt R (1986) Ecology and evolution of self-pollination in Arenaria uniflora (Caryophyllaceae). J Ecol 74:403–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kings Park and Botanic GardenBotanic Gardens and Parks AuthorityWest PerthAustralia
  2. 2.Macmasters BeachAustralia
  3. 3.School of Plant BiologyThe University of Western Australia CrawleyAustralia

Personalised recommendations