Advertisement

Conservation Genetics

, 12:1323 | Cite as

Genetic variation and clonal structure of the rare, riparian shrub Spiraea virginiana (Rosaceae)

  • Jessica R. Brzyski
  • Theresa M. Culley
Research Article

Abstract

Genetic diversity is often considered important for species that inhabit highly disturbed environments to allow for adaptation. Many variables affect levels of genetic variation; however, the two most influential variables are population size and type of reproduction. When analyzed separately, both small population size and asexual reproduction can lead to reductions in genetic variation, although the exact nature of which can be contrasting. Genetic variables such as allelic richness, heterozygosity, inbreeding coefficient, and population differentiation have opposite predictions depending upon the trait (rarity or clonality) examined. The goal of this study was to quantify genetic variation and population differentiation in a species that resides in a highly stochastic environment and is both rare and highly clonal, Spiraea virginiana, and to determine if one trait is more influential genetically than the other. From populations sampled throughout the natural range of S. virginiana, we used microsatellite loci to estimate overall genetic variation. We also calculated clonal structure within populations, which included genotypic richness, evenness, and diversity. Gene flow was investigated by quantifying the relationship between genetic and geographic distances, and population differentiation (θ) among populations. Observed heterozygosity, genotypic richness, and inbreeding coefficients were found to be representative of high clonal reproduction (averaging 0.505, 0.1, and –0.356, respectively) and the number of alleles within populations was low (range = 2.0–3.6), being more indicative of rarity. Population differentiation (θ) among populations was high (average = 0.302) and there was no relationship between genetic and geographic distances. By examining a species that exhibits two traits that both can lead to reduced genetic variation, we may find an enhanced urgency for conservation. Accurate demographic counts of clonal species are rarely, if ever, possible and genetic exploration for every species is not feasible. Therefore, the conclusions in this study can be potentially extrapolated to other riparian, clonal shrubs that share similar biology as S. virginiana.

Keywords

Asexual Conservation Disturbance Microsatellite Multilocus genotypes 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank S. Matter, E. Maurer, S. Rogstad, S. Selbo, D. Wetzel, and two anonymous reviewers for editorial comments. Thanks to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service, Ohio Department of Natural Resources, and Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation for collection permits. We also thank A. Bishop, M. Kerr, T. Littlefield, M. McAllister, J. Rock, and D. White for field assistance. Funding was provided by the Catherine H. Beatty Fellowship from the Garden Club of America and the University Research Council Fellowship and Wendel, Weiman, Benedict Award from the University of Cincinnati.

References

  1. Abramovitz JN (1996) Imperiled waters, impoverished future: the decline of freshwater ecosystems. Paper 128. Worldwatch Institute, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnaud-Haond S, Belkhir K (2007) GenClone: a computer program to analyse genotypic data, test for clonality and describe spatial clonal organization. Mol Ecol Notes 7:15–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arnaud-Haond S, Duarte CM, Alberto F, Serrão EA (2007a) Standardizing methods to address clonality in population studies. Mol Ecol 16:5115–5139PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arnaud-Haond S, Migliaccio M, Diaz-Almela E, Teixeira S, van de Vliet MS, Alberto F, Procaccini G, Duarte CM, Serrão EA (2007b) Vicariance patterns in the Mediterranean Sea: east-west cleavage and low dispersal in the endemic seagrass Posidonia oceanica. J Biogeogr 34:963–976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Balloux F, Lehmann L, de Meecûs T (2003) The population genetics of clonal and partially clonal diploids. Genetics 164:1635–1644PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bengtsson B (2003) Genetic variation in organisms with sexual and asexual reproduction. J Evol Biol 16:189–199PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bengtsson B, Ceplitis A (2000) The balance between sexual and asexual reproduction in plants living in variable environments. J Evol Biol 13:415–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Birky CW Jr (1996) Heterozygosity, heteromorphy, and phylogenetic trees in asexual eukaryotes. Genetics 144:427–437PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Brinson MM, Swift BL, Plantico RC, Barclay JS (1981) Riparian ecosystems: their ecology and status. No. FWS/OBS-81/17. US Fish and Wildlife Service, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  10. Brzyski JR (2010) Isolation and characterization of microsatellite markers in the rare clonal plant, Spiraea virginiana (Rosaceae). Am J Bot Primer Notes Protoc 97:e20–e22Google Scholar
  11. Byers DL, Meagher TR (1992) Mate availability in small populations of plant species with homomorphic sporophytic self-incompatibility. Heredity 68:353–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Center for Plant Conservation (2010) CPC National Collection Plant Profile. Missouri Botanical Garden, Missouri. http://www.centerforplantconservation.org/Collection/CPC_ViewProfile.asp?CPCNum=4076. Accessed June 2010
  13. Cole C (2003) Genetic variation in rare and common plants. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34:213–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Culley TM, Weller SG, Sakai AK, Putnam KA (2008) Characterization of microsatellite loci in the Hawaiian endemic shrub, Schiedea adamantis (Caryophyllaceae), and amplification in related species and genera. Mol Ecol Res 8:1081–1084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1987) A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissues. Phytochem Bull 19:11–15Google Scholar
  16. Ellstrand NC, Elam DR (1993) Population genetic consequences of small population size: implications for plant conservation. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 24:217–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ellstrand NC, Roose ML (1987) Patterns of genotypic diversity in clonal plant species. Am J Bot 74:123–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. England PR, Usher AV, Whelan RJ, Ayre DJ (2002) Microsatellite diversity and genetic structure of fragmented populations of the rare, fire-dependent shrub Grevillea macleayana. Mol Ecol 11:967–977PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Eriksson O (1989) Seedling dynamics and life histories in clonal plants. Oikos 55:231–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Falk DA (1992) From conservation biology to conservation practice: strategies for protecting plant diversity. In: Fiedler PL, Jain SK (eds) Conservation biology: the theory and practice of nature conservation, preservation and management. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 397–431Google Scholar
  21. Frankham R (1995) Conservation genetics. Annu Rev Genet 29:305–327PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Futuyma DJ (2010) Evolutionary constraint and ecological consequences. Evolution 64:1865–1884PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gitzendanner MA, Soltis PA (2000) Patterns of genetic variation in rare and widespread plant congeners. Am J Bot 87:783–792PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gustafsson S, Sjögren-Gulve P (2002) Genetic diversity in the rare orchid, Gymnadenia odoratissima and a comparison with the more common congener, G. conopsea. Conserv Genet 3:225–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Halkett F, Simon J, Balloux F (2005) Tackling the population genetics of clonal and partially clonal organisms. Trends Ecol Evol 20:194–201PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hamrick JL, Godt MJW (1989) Allozyme diversity in plant species. In: Brown AHD, Clegg MT, Kahler AL, Weir BS (eds) Plant populations genetics, breeding, and genetic resources. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, pp 43–63Google Scholar
  27. Hamrick JL, Godt MJW (1996) Effects of life history traits on genetic diversity in plant species. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Biol Sci 351:1291–1298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hamrick JL, Godt MJW, Murawski DA, Loveless MD (1991) Correlations between species traits and allozyme diversity: implications for conservation biology. In: Falk DA, Holsinger KE (eds) Genetics and conservation of rare plants. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 75–86Google Scholar
  29. Honnay O, Jacquemyn H (2008) A meta-analysis of the relation between mating system, growth form and genotypic diversity in clonal plant species. Evol Ecol 22:299–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Johansson ME, Nilsson C (1993) Hydrochory, population dynamics and distribution of the clonal aquatic plant Ranunculus lingua. J Ecol 81:81–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Johansson ME, Nilsson C, Nilsson E (1996) Do rivers function as corridors for plant dispersal? J Veg Sci 7:593–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Karron JD (1987) A comparison of levels of genetic polymorphism and self-compatibility in geographically restricted and widespread plant congeners. Evol Ecol 1:47–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Karron JD (1991) Patterns of genetic variation and breeding systems in rare plant species. In: Falk DAI, Holsinger KE (eds) Genetics and conservation of rare plants. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 87–98Google Scholar
  34. Kikuchi S, Isagi Y (2002) Microsatellite genetic variation in small and isolated populations of Magnolia sieboldii ssp. japonica. Heredity 88:313–321PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lande R, Shannon S (1996) The role of genetic variation in adaptation and population persistence in a changing environment. Evolution 50:434–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lewis PO, Zaykin D (2001) Genetic data analysis: computer program for analysis of allelic data, version 1.1. University of Connecticut, Connecticut. http://lewis.eeb.uconn.edu/lewishome/software.html
  37. Maruyama T (1970) Effective number of alleles in a subdivided population. Theor Popul Biol 1:273–306PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Meerow AW, Gideon M, Kuhn DN, Montamayor JC, Nakamura K (2007) Genetic structure and gene flow among south Florida populations of Iris hexagona Walt. (Iridaceae) assessed with 19 microsatellite DNA loci. Int J Plant Sci 168:1291–1309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Merritt DM, Nilsson C, Jansson R (2010) Consequences of propagule dispersal and river fragmentation for riparian plant community diversity and turnover. Ecol Monogr 80:609–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Millar MA, Byrne M, Coates DJ (2010) The maintenance of disparate levels of clonality, genetic diversity and genetic differentiation in disjunct subspecies of the rare Banksia ionthocarpa. Mol Ecol 19:4217–4227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Naiman RJ, Décamps H (1997) The ecology of interfaces: riparian zones. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 28:621–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Naiman RJ, Fetherston KL, McKay SJ, Chen J (1997) Riparian forests. In: Naiman RJ, Bilby RE (eds) River ecology and management: lessons from the Pacific Coastal region. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  43. Paetkau D, Slade R, Burden M, Estoup A (2004) Genetic assignment methods for the direct, real-time estimation of migration rate: a simulation-based exploration of accuracy and power. Mol Ecol 13:55–65PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Parks JC, Werth CR (1993) A study of spatial features of clones in a population of bracken fern, Pteridium aquilinum (Dennstaedtiaceae). Am J Bot 80:537–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Peakall R, Smouse PE (2006) GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes 6:288–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Piry S, Alapetite A, Cornuet JM, Paetkau D, Baudouin L, Estoup A (2004) GENECLASS2: a software for genetic assignment and first-generation migrant detection. J Hered 95:536–539PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rannala B, Mountain JL (1997) Detecting immigration by using multilocus genotypes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:9197–9201PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Reusch TBH, Stam WT, Olsen JL (2000) A microsatellite-based estimation of clonal diversity and population subdivision in Zostera marina, a marine flowering plant. Mol Ecol 9:127–140PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schemske DW, Husband BC, Ruckelshaus MH, Goodwillie C, Parker IM, Bishop JG (1994) Evaluating approaches to the conservation of rare and endangered plants. Ecology 75:584–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schuelke M (2000) An economic method for the fluorescent labeling of PCR fragments. Nat Biotechnol 18:233–234PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Stoeckel S, Grange J, Fernández-Manjarres JF, Bilger I, Frascaria-Lacoste N, Mariette S (2006) Heterozygote excess in a self-incompatible and partially clonal forest tree species—Prunus avium L. Mol Ecol 15:2109–2118PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (1992) Virginia spiraea (Spiraea virginiana Britton) recovery plan. Newton Corner, Newton, MA, p 47Google Scholar
  53. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (1990) Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants: threatened status determined for Spiraea virginiana (Virginia Spiraea). Fed Reg 55:24241–24246Google Scholar
  54. Van Geert A, Van Rossum F, Triest L (2008) Genetic diversity in adult and seedling populations of Primula vulgaris in a fragmented agricultural landscape. Conserv Genet 9:845–853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Van Valen L (1965) Morphological variation and width of ecological niche. Am Nat 99:377–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Weir BS, Cockerham CC (1984) Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38:1358–1370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wilson GA, Rannala B (2003) Bayesian inference of recent migration rates using multilocus genotypes. Genetics 163:1177–1191PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Wintle BC, Kirkpatrick JB (2007) The response of riparian vegetation to flood-maintained habitat heterogeneity. Austral Ecol 32:592–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wright S (1931) Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16:97–159PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Wright S (1940) Breeding structure of populations in relation to speciation. Am Nat 74:232–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wright S (1965) The interpretation of population structure by F-statistics with special regard to systems of mating. Evolution 19:395–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Young A, Boyle T, Brown T (1996) The population genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation for plants. Trends Ecol Evol 11:413–418PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Young AG, Hill JH, Murray BG, Peakall R (2002) Breeding system, genetic diversity and clonal structure the sub-alpine forb Rutidosis leiolepis F. Muell. (Asteraceae). Biol Conserv 106:71–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of CincinnatiCincinnatiUSA

Personalised recommendations